Arkansas

SEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 37 · Raw net 12.4 · Tempo 72.8 · 37 Division I games · Through 2026-03-26

Record: 28–9; 28 wins
AdjNet: 20.5β; rank 19 of 365
AdjO: 123.9β; rank 6 of 365
AdjD: 103.4β; rank 62 of 365
AdjT: 71.8β
SOS: 10.7β; rank 10 of 363
NCSOS: 4.1β
WAB: 7.8β; rank 8 of 363
RR: 3.0β
Exp. W: 25.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	122.23	109.8216	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	56.416	51.8202	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	12.21	15.6247	16.7
Offensive rebound %	32.0121	30.9198	30.6
FTA / FGA %	35.9156	31.288	35.0
Shooting
3P%	38.217	31.855	33.9
2P%	56.043	54.4286	51.7
FT%	75.177	72.2170	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	33.0	38.1	39.5
Assists / FGM %	53.1	49.9	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	13.2	6.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	27.1	28.8	31.4
2-pointers %	53.6	53.3	48.8
Free throws %	19.3	17.9	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 7.8
Top Three Share of Minutes: 47%
Bench Share of Minutes: 28%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Southern U.	W 109–77	81.1	Home	1–0
11-08	Michigan St.	L 66–69	68.1	Away	1–1
11-11	Central Ark.	W 93–56	74.2	Home	2–1
11-14	Samford	W 79–75	72.1	Home	3–1
11-18	Winthrop	W 84–83	71.2	Home	4–1
11-21	Jackson St.	W 115–61	76.2	Home	5–1
11-27	Duke	L 71–80	70.1	Neutral	5–2
12-03	Louisville	W 89–80	75.6	Home	6–2
12-06	Fresno St.	W 82–58	73.1	Home	7–2
12-13	Texas Tech	W 93–86	66.5	Neutral	8–2
12-16	Queens (NC)	W 108–80	79.7	Home	9–2
12-20	Houston	L 85–94	73.3	Neutral	9–3
12-29	James Madison	W 103–74	69.9	Home	10–3
01-03	Tennessee	W 86–75	74.8	Home	11–3
01-07	Ole Miss	W 94–87	72.1	Away	12–3
01-10	Auburn	L 73–95	71.7	Away	12–4
01-14	South Carolina	W 108–74	72.9	Home	13–4
01-17	Georgia	L 76–90	83.1	Away	13–5
01-20	Vanderbilt	W 93–68	67.4	Home	14–5
01-24	LSU	W 85–81	68.7	Home	15–5
01-27	Oklahoma	W 83–79	68.9	Away	16–5
01-31	Kentucky	L 77–85	66.8	Home	16–6
02-07	Mississippi St.	W 88–68	70.2	Away	17–6
02-10	LSU	W 91–62	74.6	Away	18–6
02-14	Auburn	W 88–75	66.8	Home	19–6
02-18	Alabama	L 115–117 2OT	87.6	Away	19–7
02-21	Missouri	W 94–86	68.4	Home	20–7
02-25	Texas A&M	W 99–84	77.3	Home	21–7
02-28	Florida	L 77–111	80.8	Away	21–8
03-04	Texas	W 105–85	79.0	Home	22–8
03-07	Missouri	W 88–84 1OT	76.4	Away	23–8
03-13	Oklahoma	W 82–79	70.0	Neutral	24–8
03-14	Ole Miss	W 93–90 1OT	77.7	Neutral	25–8
03-15	Vanderbilt	W 86–75	70.1	Neutral	26–8
03-19	Hawaii	W 97–78	76.7	—	27–8
03-21	High Point	W 94–88	77.4	—	28–8
03-26	Arizona	L 88–109	79.9	—	28–9

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 37 of 37 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Darius Acuff Jr.	36	35:03	84.1%	23.5	3.1	6.4	0.8	0.3	2.2	1.6	197–388	50.8%	91–207	44.0%	178–220	80.9%	56.1%	61.1%	37.0%	5	36:23 +1:21	88.7%	28.4 +4.9
Trevon Brazile	36	31:24	75.4%	13.0	7.3	1.6	1.5	1.6	1.1	2.0	124–190	65.3%	45–132	34.1%	86–120	71.7%	59.5%	62.6%	37.3%	5	33:56 +2:32	82.8%	13.2 +0.2
Meleek Thomas	37	30:30	75.2%	15.6	3.8	2.5	1.5	0.2	1.0	2.1	121–270	44.8%	82–197	41.6%	91–108	84.3%	52.2%	56.3%	23.1%	5	36:59 +6:29	90.2%	18.6 +3.0
Billy Richmond III	37	27:29	67.8%	11.2	4.3	2.0	1.1	0.8	1.2	2.4	155–244	63.5%	15–58	25.9%	58–74	78.4%	58.8%	61.7%	24.5%	5	35:27 +7:58	86.5%	12.0 +0.8
D.J. Wagner	35	23:15	54.3%	7.4	1.6	2.4	0.9	0.3	0.7	1.8	53–103	51.5%	37–107	34.6%	42–58	72.4%	51.7%	55.0%	27.6%	5	19:15 −4:00	47.0%	5.8 −1.6
Malique Ewin	37	20:53	51.5%	9.8	5.7	1.0	0.7	1.1	1.2	2.3	128–218	58.7%	3–4	75.0%†	99–134	73.9%	59.7%	64.8%	60.4%	5	28:48 +7:55	70.2%	11.2 +1.4
Nick Pringle	35	18:59	44.3%	4.6	3.9	0.6	0.4	0.5	0.8	2.8	62–85	72.9%†	0–0	—	38–68	55.9%	72.9%†	70.5%†	80.0%†	3	19:43 +0:45	28.9%	3.3 −1.3
Karter Knox	22	22:25	32.9%	8.1	4.5	1.2	0.7	0.5	1.0	2.0	38–70	54.3%	26–69	37.7%	24–33	72.7%	55.4%	58.0%	23.7%	—	—	—	—
Isaiah Sealy	19	6:48	8.6%	2.9	1.3	0.6	0.3	0.3	0.3	1.3	17–27	63.0%†	0–7	0.0%†	21–28	75.0%	50.0%†	59.4%†	82.4%†	3	2:30 −4:18	3.7%	0.7 −2.2
Jaden KaruletwaFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	2:32	1.5%	0.6	0.3	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.4	0–0	—	1–5	20.0%†	2–2	100.0%†	30.0%†	42.5%†	40.0%†	—	—	—	—
Elmir DzaficFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	2:06	1.0%	0.4	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.1	0.6	0.6	0–0	—	0–0	—	3–6	50.0%†	—	56.8%†	—	—	—	—	—
Ayden KelleyFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	1:22	0.6%	0.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–1	0.0%†	1–1	100.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	75.0%†	69.4%†	100.0%†	—	—	—	—
Amere BrownFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	0:59	0.5%	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–3	0.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	0.0%†	8.7%†	100.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	37 games			90.2	36.0	17.2	not published	5.2	9.0	not published	895–1599	56.0%	301–788	38.2%	644–857	75.1%	56.4%	60.4%	35.9%
Sum of players				90.2	32.6	17.2	7.4	5.2	8.8	16.7	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.5	0.0	not published	+0.1	+0.2	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.60M; 80% Range $2.55M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.60M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Darius Acuff Jr.	84.8%	$555K	$315K to $870K	15.7%	$555K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Trevon Brazile	76.1%	$605K	$390K to $940K	16.4%	$605K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Meleek Thomas	75.5%	$700K	$450K to $1.15M	18.9%	$700K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Billy Richmond III	68.2%	$375K	$170K to $600K	11.1%	$375K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
D.J. Wagner	54.7%	$210K	$50K to $370K	6.2%	$210K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Malique Ewin	52.3%	$435K	$270K to $715K	11.8%	$435K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Nick Pringle	44.3%	$250K	$110K to $400K	7.3%	$250K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Karter Knox	32.0%	$210K	$115K to $320K	6.0%	$210K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Sealy	8.6%	$58K	$32K to $91K	1.7%	$58K in all four	$27K	Limited evidence
Jaden Karuletwa	1.4%	$27K	$16K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Elmir Dzafic	1.0%	$27K	$16K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Ayden Kelley	0.6%	$27K	$16K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Amere Brown	0.4%	$27K	$16K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.60M	$2.55M to $4.95M	100%	$3.60M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Arkansas (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$25,392,395
Men's basketball expenses	$21,254,027
Athletics department expenses	$188,988,863
Athletics department revenue	$195,879,594

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 37 games, 2,730 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	90.2	81.0
Field goals made	32.3	29.4
Field goals attempted	64.5	64.2
3-pointers made	8.1	7.8
3-pointers attempted	21.3	24.5
Free throws made	17.4	14.5
Free throws attempted	23.2	20.1
Offensive rebounds	10.9	11.2
Defensive rebounds	25.1	23.2
Total rebounds	36.0	34.4
Assists	17.2	14.6
Blocks	5.2	2.8
Turnovers	9.0	11.5
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 272.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 618.
Minutes (derived)	202.7	not published

37 of 37 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	3,337	3,337	0	±16.7	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,196	1,196	0	±6.0	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,387	2,387	0	±11.9	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	301	301	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	788	788	0	±3.9	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	644	644	0	±3.2	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	857	857	0	±4.3	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,333	1,205	+128	±106.6	0
Assists	Reconciled	635	635	0	±3.2	0
Blocks	Residual shown	194	191	+3	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	332	325	+7	±10.0	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	272	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	618	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,500	7,465	+35.2	±150.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Darius Acuff Jr.	84.8%	+3.6range +1.9 to +4.8Sufficient evidence
Trevon Brazile	76.1%	+4.4range +3.0 to +5.6Sufficient evidence
Meleek Thomas	75.5%	+5.0range +3.4 to +6.3Sufficient evidence
Billy Richmond III	68.2%	+2.6range +1.2 to +3.9Sufficient evidence
D.J. Wagner	54.7%	+1.1range -0.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
Malique Ewin	52.3%	+4.2range +3.0 to +5.6Sufficient evidence
Nick Pringle	44.3%	+2.7range +0.5 to +4.1Sufficient evidence
Karter Knox	32.0%	+2.9range +1.6 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Sealy	8.6%	+1.3range +0.6 to +2.3Limited evidence
Jaden Karuletwa	1.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Elmir Dzafic	1.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ayden Kelley	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Amere Brown	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +12.8range +11.6 to +13.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 99.3% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.7%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.7%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value