Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Houston

B12 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 6 · Raw net 22.4 · Tempo 64.8 · 37 Division I games · Through 2026-03-26

All seasons
Record
30–7
30 wins
AdjNet
27.5β
rank 6 of 365
AdjO
120.3β
rank 15 of 365
AdjD
92.9β
rank 4 of 365
AdjT
64.7β
SOS
9.3β
rank 22 of 363
NCSOS
-0.6β
WAB
8.9β
rank 6 of 363
RR
-0.2β
Exp. W
30.2β

Scouting Report

CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.118.33395.95108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%51.915146.21251.4
TO / 100 poss.12.8320.61416.7
Offensive rebound %35.73230.317230.6
FTA / FGA %26.335538.727935.0
Shooting
3P%34.713431.64933.9
2P%51.717945.3951.7
FT%77.32869.53472.5
Style
3PA / FGA %40.741.539.5
Assists / FGM %52.653.552.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %12.56.49.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %34.233.031.4
2-pointers %49.444.448.8
Free throws %16.422.519.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes
47%
Bench Share of Minutes
29%
Players with Logged Minutes
13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03LehighW 75–5768.2Home1–0
11-08TowsonW 65–4865.0Home2–0
11-12OaklandW 78–4562.0Home3–0
11-16AuburnW 73–7266.7Neutral4–0
11-20RiderW 91–4567.3Home5–0
11-24SyracuseW 78–74 1OT75.3Neutral6–0
11-25TennesseeL 73–7660.5Neutral6–1
11-26Notre DameW 66–5659.0Neutral7–1
12-06Florida St.W 82–6769.4Neutral8–1
12-10Jackson St.W 80–3864.3Home9–1
12-13LSU New OrleansW 99–5767.8Home10–1
12-20ArkansasW 94–8573.3Neutral11–1
12-29Middle Tenn.W 69–6059.5Home12–1
01-03CincinnatiW 67–6063.9Away13–1
01-06Texas TechW 69–6566.3Home14–1
01-10BaylorW 77–5562.0Away15–1
01-13West VirginiaW 77–4861.4Home16–1
01-18Arizona St.W 103–7370.6Home17–1
01-24Texas TechL 86–9065.1Away17–2
01-28TCUW 79–7070.1Away18–2
01-31CincinnatiW 76–5459.4Home19–2
02-04UCFW 79–5561.6Home20–2
02-07BYUW 77–6658.7Away21–2
02-10UtahW 66–5258.7Away22–2
02-14Kansas St.W 78–6475.6Home23–2
02-16Iowa St.L 67–7058.3Away23–3
02-21ArizonaL 66–7364.6Home23–4
02-23KansasL 56–6964.9Away23–5
02-28ColoradoW 102–6269.1Home24–5
03-04BaylorW 77–6465.2Home25–5
03-07Oklahoma St.W 82–7566.9Away26–5
03-12BYUW 73–6669.3Neutral27–5
03-13KansasW 69–4759.3Neutral28–5
03-14ArizonaL 74–7965.7Neutral28–6
03-19IdahoW 78–4765.7—29–6
03-21Texas A&MW 88–5765.5—30–6
03-26IllinoisL 55–6558.5—30–7

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 37 of 37 team games

MinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Milos Uzan3732:2980.9%11.12.74.01.00.11.31.476–17942.5%72–21034.3%43–5874.1%47.3%49.6%14.9%532:11 −0:1880.5%9.4 −1.7
Kingston Flemings3731:3878.8%16.14.15.21.50.31.82.0181–36050.3%41–10638.7%109–12984.5%52.0%56.8%27.7%532:03 +0:2580.1%13.4 −2.7
Emanuel Sharp3729:2873.4%15.53.01.71.20.11.03.079–16547.9%97–26137.2%123–13889.1%52.7%58.8%32.4%528:48 −0:4072.0%14.0 −1.5
Chris Cenac Jr3724:5762.2%9.57.90.70.80.50.92.3113–20555.1%30–9033.3%36–5862.1%53.6%54.9%19.7%524:38 −0:1961.6%10.4 +0.9
Joseph Tugler3723:4559.2%8.45.31.31.31.51.33.0128–22357.4%1–1100.0%†53–7570.7%57.8%60.7%33.5%526:36 +2:5166.5%10.2 +1.8
Isiah Harwell3213:4329.6%3.62.00.50.60.30.31.213–4429.5%23–8527.1%19–3161.3%36.8%40.0%24.0%34:08 −9:356.2%0.0 −3.6
Kalifa Sakho3412:5229.5%2.42.60.10.20.60.41.733–4082.5%†0–0—16–2759.3%82.5%†79.0%†67.5%†512:25 −0:2731.1%1.2 −1.2
Mercy Miller3611:4728.6%5.01.80.50.60.20.31.250–8956.2%17–5034.0%30–4173.2%54.3%57.6%29.5%519:54 +8:0749.8%8.2 +3.2
Chase McCarty3512:0728.6%4.12.50.20.40.30.21.313–2065.0%34–9535.8%16–1888.9%†55.7%58.6%15.7%515:11 +3:0438.0%5.4 +1.3
Ramon Walker Jr.2910:4420.9%2.31.90.50.20.10.30.811–2445.8%†9–3426.5%†19–2576.0%42.2%†49.3%†43.1%†36:03 −4:419.1%1.0 −1.3
Cedric Lath213:425.2%0.50.70.00.00.10.00.74–666.7%†0–0—2–2100.0%†66.7%†72.7%†33.3%†32:10 −1:323.2%0.0 −0.5
Kordel Jefferson33:550.8%1.30.70.30.00.00.31.02–366.7%†0–20.0%†0–0—40.0%†40.0%†0.0%†————
Jacob McFarland42:210.6%0.00.80.00.30.00.00.30–10.0%†0–0—0–10.0%†0.0%†0.0%†100.0%†11:11 −1:100.6%0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per game37 games76.937.114.63.88.3703–135951.7%324–93434.7%466–60377.3%51.9%55.6%26.3%
Sum of players76.933.114.67.53.87.617.9Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+4.00.00.0+0.7

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$3.55M
80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier
Power 4
medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$3.55M in all four
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
13
3 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Milos Uzan81.9%$665K$450K to $985K18.2%$665K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Kingston Flemings80.3%$545K$355K to $805K15.5%$545K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Emanuel Sharp75.0%$650K$445K to $980K17.8%$650K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Chris Cenac Jr63.3%$485K$330K to $710K13.4%$485K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Joseph Tugler59.8%$505K$340K to $785K13.9%$505K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Kalifa Sakho29.9%$130K$52K to $220K3.9%$130K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Chase McCarty28.4%$145K$66K to $230K4.3%$145K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Isiah Harwell28.1%$135K$60K to $215K3.9%$135K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Mercy Miller27.5%$82K$27K to $165K2.4%$82K in all four$27KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ramon Walker Jr.20.4%$71K$27K to $130K2.1%$71K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Cedric Lath4.2%$27K$15K to $43K0.8%$27K in all four$27KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Kordel Jefferson0.8%$27K$15K to $43K0.8%$27K in all four$27KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jacob McFarland0.4%$27K$15K to $43K0.8%$27K in all four$27KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool—$3.55M$2.60M to $4.95M100%$3.55M in all four—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Houston (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$14,577,598Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$14,577,598
Athletics department expenses$100,162,965
Athletics department revenue$100,162,965

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 37 games, 2,404 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

StatisticTeamOpponents
Points76.962.3
Field goals made27.820.7
Field goals attempted62.052.3
3-pointers made8.86.9
3-pointers attempted25.221.7
Free throws made12.614.1
Free throws attempted16.320.2
Offensive rebounds12.810.5
Defensive rebounds24.323.1
Total rebounds37.133.6
Assists14.611.1
Blocks3.82.4
Turnovers8.313.4
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 279.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 664.
Minutes (derived)200.7

37 of 37 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,8442,8440±14.20
Field goals madeReconciled1,0271,0270±5.10
Field goals attemptedReconciled2,2932,2930±11.50
3-pointers madeReconciled3243240±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled9349340±4.70
Free throws madeReconciled4664660±2.30
Free throws attemptedReconciled6036030±3.00
Offensive reboundsNo player split
Defensive reboundsNo player split
Total reboundsResidual shown1,3711,224+147±109.70
AssistsReconciled5405400±2.70
BlocksReconciled1411410±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown308282+26±9.20
StealsNo team figure279
Personal foulsNo team figure664
Minutes (derived)Reconciled7,4257,400+25.0±148.50

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Milos Uzan81.9%+5.9range +4.5 to +7.1Sufficient evidence
Kingston Flemings80.3%+4.8range +3.7 to +5.9Sufficient evidence
Emanuel Sharp75.0%+6.2range +5.0 to +7.3Sufficient evidence
Chris Cenac Jr63.3%+5.4range +4.2 to +6.7Sufficient evidence
Joseph Tugler59.8%+6.2range +4.6 to +7.4Sufficient evidence
Kalifa Sakho29.9%+2.0range +0.8 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Chase McCarty28.4%+2.6range +1.3 to +4.1Sufficient evidence
Isiah Harwell28.1%+2.3range +1.3 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Mercy Miller27.5%+0.4range -0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Ramon Walker Jr.20.4%+0.5range -0.4 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Cedric Lath4.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Kordel Jefferson0.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jacob McFarland0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+13.9range +12.9 to +14.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.9% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value