Darius Acuff Jr.
Arkansas · 2025–26 · 36 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1261:33 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 36
- Minutes per game
- 35:03
- Points per game
- 23.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.1 / 6.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 23.5 | 3.1 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 26.8 | 3.5 | 7.4 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 1.9 |
| Season totals | 845 | 111 | 232 | 30 | 11 | 78 | 59 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 288–595 | 48.4% | 16.5 | 18.9 |
| 2P | 197–388 | 50.8% | 10.8 | 12.3 |
| 3P | 91–207 | 44.0% | 5.8 | 6.6 |
| FT | 178–220 | 80.9% | 6.1 | 7.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.1% | 61.1% | 34.8% | 37.0% | 2.97 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Arkansas · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $555K
- 80% range $315K to $870K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.7%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $555K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 84.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Arkansas: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Arkansas | $555Kspeculative | $315K to $870K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.6 | +1.9 to +4.8 | Sufficient evidence | +4.3 | -0.7 | +8.3range +7.0 to +9.2 | 4,497 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:23 | 35:03 | 22:17–50:00 | |
| Points | 28.4 | 23.5 | 10.0–49.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 50.0% | 56.4% | 33.3%–90.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-26 | Arizona | L 88–109 | 35:41 | 28 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-19 | 1-5 | 11-14 | 44.7% |
| 2026-03-21 | High Point | W 94–88 | 34:12 | 36 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11-22 | 3-6 | 11-13 | 56.8% |
| 2026-03-19 | Hawaii | W 97–78 | 36:22 | 24 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9-19 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 52.6% |
| 2026-03-15 | Vanderbilt | W 86–75 | 36:15 | 30 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9-20 | 5-8 | 7-8 | 57.5% |
| 2026-03-14 | Ole Miss | W 93–90 | 39:26 | 24 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7-21 | 2-7 | 8-9 | 38.1% |
| 2026-03-13 | Oklahoma | W 82–79 | 39:45 | 37 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11-21 | 5-9 | 10-12 | 64.3% |
| 2026-03-04 | Texas | W 105–85 | 35:43 | 28 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-15 | 4-6 | 8-10 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | Florida | L 77–111 | 33:58 | 17 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-19 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 34.2% |
| 2026-02-25 | Texas A&M | W 99–84 | 37:00 | 22 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-19 | 1-6 | 7-9 | 39.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Missouri | W 94–86 | 34:35 | 20 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-11 | 1-3 | 11-13 | 40.9% |
| 2026-02-18 | Alabama | L 115–117 | 50:00 | 49 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 16-27 | 6-10 | 11-12 | 70.4% |
| 2026-02-14 | Auburn | W 88–75 | 37:32 | 31 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10-15 | 7-10 | 4-5 | 90.0% |
| 2026-02-10 | LSU | W 91–62 | 35:36 | 28 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 13-22 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 61.4% |
| 2026-02-07 | Mississippi St. | W 88–68 | 37:51 | 24 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-19 | 3-5 | 3-3 | 55.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Kentucky | L 77–85 | 38:34 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-20 | 1-4 | 5-8 | 42.5% |
| 2026-01-27 | Oklahoma | W 83–79 | 35:41 | 21 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-16 | 1-4 | 6-7 | 46.9% |
| 2026-01-24 | LSU | W 85–81 | 34:16 | 31 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13-19 | 4-7 | 1-4 | 78.9% |
| 2026-01-20 | Vanderbilt | W 93–68 | 33:57 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7-14 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 60.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | Georgia | L 76–90 | 38:24 | 20 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 7-16 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | South Carolina | W 108–74 | 30:09 | 18 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-4 | 3-3 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Auburn | L 73–95 | 34:50 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-16 | 2-6 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Ole Miss | W 94–87 | 33:08 | 26 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7-18 | 1-4 | 11-12 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | Tennessee | W 86–75 | 35:27 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 9-16 | 3-7 | 8-9 | 65.6% |
| 2025-12-29 | James Madison | W 103–74 | 29:46 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-12 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 70.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | Houston | L 85–94 | 38:59 | 27 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9-15 | 1-3 | 8-11 | 63.3% |
| 2025-12-16 | Queens (NC) | W 108–80 | 30:59 | 23 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-13 | 4-6 | 3-4 | 76.9% |
| 2025-12-13 | Texas Tech | W 93–86 | 34:56 | 20 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7-14 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-06 | Fresno St. | W 82–58 | 32:41 | 18 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-12 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 70.8% |
| 2025-12-03 | Louisville | W 89–80 | 35:48 | 17 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6-18 | 0-4 | 5-7 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-27 | Duke | L 71–80 | 37:11 | 21 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-17 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 58.8% |
| 2025-11-21 | Jackson St. | W 115–61 | 22:17 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-18 | Winthrop | W 84–83 | 33:11 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Samford | W 79–75 | 31:16 | 20 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-13 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 61.5% |
| 2025-11-11 | Central Ark. | W 93–56 | 33:58 | 21 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9-16 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 65.6% |
| 2025-11-08 | Michigan St. | L 66–69 | 33:06 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-16 | 2-8 | 4-7 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | Southern U. | W 109–77 | 29:03 | 22 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8-13 | 3-5 | 3-3 | 73.1% |