Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Duke

ACC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 1 · Raw net 26.9 · Tempo 66.8 · 38 Division I games · Through 2026-03-29

All seasons
Record
35–3
35 wins
AdjNet
32.8β
rank 2 of 365
AdjO
124.8β
rank 4 of 365
AdjD
92.0β
rank 2 of 365
AdjT
66.8β
SOS
10.8β
rank 9 of 363
NCSOS
7.8β
WAB
14.4β
rank 3 of 363
RR
1.7β
Exp. W
33.3β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.122.2495.22108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%56.61346.21351.4
TO / 100 poss.15.913617.313216.7
Offensive rebound %38.4425.21030.6
FTA / FGA %38.29622.8235.0
Shooting
3P%34.713230.62633.9
2P%60.2746.41851.7
FT%72.917671.211172.5
Style
3PA / FGA %43.545.039.5
Assists / FGM %58.852.352.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %10.69.79.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %32.138.131.4
2-pointers %48.247.048.8
Free throws %19.714.919.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes
43%
Bench Share of Minutes
35%
Players with Logged Minutes
12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-04TexasW 75–6066.6Neutral1–0
11-08Western Caro.W 95–5476.4Home2–0
11-11Army West PointW 114–5977.1Away3–0
11-14Indiana St.W 100–6276.5Home4–0
11-18KansasW 78–6666.0Neutral5–0
11-21NiagaraW 100–4264.8Home6–0
11-23HowardW 93–5670.7Home7–0
11-27ArkansasW 80–7170.1Neutral8–0
12-02FloridaW 67–6665.2Home9–0
12-06Michigan St.W 66–6064.3Away10–0
12-16LipscombW 97–7382.5Home11–0
12-20Texas TechL 81–8270.4Neutral11–1
12-31Georgia TechW 85–7971.9Home12–1
01-03Florida St.W 91–8769.7Away13–1
01-06LouisvilleW 84–7374.5Away14–1
01-10SMUW 82–7569.6Home15–1
01-14CaliforniaW 71–5664.6Away16–1
01-17StanfordW 80–5063.0Away17–1
01-24Wake ForestW 90–6964.8Home18–1
01-26LouisvilleW 83–5264.9Home19–1
01-31Virginia TechW 72–5857.6Away20–1
02-03Boston CollegeW 67–4961.4Home21–1
02-07North CarolinaL 68–7163.8Away21–2
02-10PittsburghW 70–5461.3Away22–2
02-14ClemsonW 67–5461.9Home23–2
02-16SyracuseW 101–6464.2Home24–2
02-21MichiganW 68–6361.8Neutral25–2
02-24Notre DameW 100–5671.5Away26–2
02-28VirginiaW 77–5160.9Home27–2
03-02NC StateW 93–6464.5Away28–2
03-07North CarolinaW 76–6165.0Home29–2
03-12Florida St.W 80–7967.2Neutral30–2
03-13ClemsonW 73–6163.2Neutral31–2
03-14VirginiaW 74–7063.5Neutral32–2
03-19SienaW 71–6561.9—33–2
03-21TCUW 81–5869.3—34–2
03-27St. John's (NY)W 80–7564.1—35–2
03-29UConnL 72–7362.8—35–3

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 38 of 38 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groupsMinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Cameron Boozer3833:2683.6%22.510.24.11.40.62.51.7236–38461.5%54–13839.1%221–28078.9%60.7%66.3%53.6%536:47 +3:2192.0%20.6 −1.9
Isaiah Evans3828:1470.6%15.03.21.30.70.71.11.285–15056.7%101–28036.1%98–11486.0%55.0%59.5%26.5%530:41 +2:2776.7%17.0 +2.0
Dame Sarr3823:3258.8%6.43.81.11.00.41.11.841–7554.7%43–13332.3%33–6253.2%50.7%51.9%29.8%530:16 +6:4475.7%8.0 +1.6
Cayden Boozer3822:3656.5%7.72.33.00.80.11.31.585–14459.0%20–6630.3%61–7581.3%54.8%59.9%35.7%533:10 +10:3482.9%13.2 +5.5
Caleb Foster3324:5354.0%8.33.52.80.30.11.11.762–12848.4%39–9839.8%32–5558.2%53.3%54.6%24.3%216:05 −8:4816.1%5.5 −2.8
Maliq Brown3820:0750.3%4.95.21.61.80.61.22.778–10276.5%5–3016.7%†17–3450.0%64.8%64.0%25.8%520:58 +0:5152.4%5.6 +0.7
Nikolas Khamenia3819:4449.3%5.73.31.00.60.10.81.740–6660.6%35–10334.0%33–4967.3%54.7%57.2%29.0%524:15 +4:3060.6%5.8 +0.1
Patrick Ngongba3221:5846.2%10.15.82.00.61.11.32.8106–15767.5%8–3125.8%†87–13166.4%62.8%65.7%69.7%317:23 −4:3526.1%4.3 −5.8
Darren Harris369:2922.4%3.30.80.40.30.00.10.710–2245.5%†23–6933.3%30–3976.9%48.9%†55.0%†42.9%†56:11 −3:1715.5%0.6 −2.7
Cameron SheffieldUnder 100 minutes152:342.5%0.50.50.10.00.00.00.11–520.0%†2–728.6%†0–0—33.3%†33.3%†0.0%†11:12 −1:220.6%0.0 −0.5
Jack ScottUnder 100 minutes152:312.5%0.50.80.10.10.00.10.41–425.0%†2–2100.0%†0–0—66.7%†66.7%†0.0%†11:12 −1:190.6%0.0 −0.5
Ifeanyi UfochukwuFew gamesUnder 100 minutes54:001.3%0.80.60.00.00.20.41.22–450.0%†0–0—0–10.0%†50.0%†45.0%†25.0%†————
Team, games with logs · per game38 games81.640.216.7not published3.410.7not published747–124160.2%332–95734.7%612–84072.9%56.6%60.4%38.2%
Sum of players81.637.316.77.43.410.315.5Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+2.90.0not published+0.0+0.4not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$3.55M
80% Range $2.60M to $4.90M
Tier
Power 4
medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$3.55M in all four
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
12
3 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Cameron Boozer83.7%$885K$585K to $1.40M24.0%$885K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Isaiah Evans70.6%$540K$355K to $805K15.1%$540K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Dame Sarr59.1%$405K$260K to $600K11.5%$405K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Cayden Boozer56.4%$285K$150K to $440K8.4%$285K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Caleb Foster54.4%$300K$170K to $460K8.9%$300K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Maliq Brown50.3%$240K$110K to $375K7.0%$240K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Nikolas Khamenia49.5%$275K$150K to $425K8.2%$275K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Patrick Ngongba46.6%$400K$280K to $580K11.1%$400K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Darren Harris22.9%$79K$31K to $145K2.3%$79K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Cameron Sheffield2.6%$29K$16K to $46K0.8%$29K in all four$29KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jack Scott2.6%$29K$16K to $46K0.8%$29K in all four$29KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Ifeanyi Ufochukwu1.5%$29K$16K to $46K0.8%$29K in all four$29KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool—$3.55M$2.60M to $4.90M100%$3.55M in all four—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Duke University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$52,729,506
Men's basketball expenses$31,868,603
Athletics department expenses$180,590,186
Athletics department revenue$181,607,802

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 38 games, 2,539 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points81.663.6
Field goals made28.423.0
Field goals attempted57.858.6
3-pointers made8.78.1
3-pointers attempted25.226.4
Free throws made16.19.5
Free throws attempted22.113.3
Offensive rebounds12.49.4
Defensive rebounds27.819.9
Total rebounds40.229.3
Assists16.712.1
Blocks3.43.2
Turnovers10.711.6
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 281.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 588.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

38 of 38 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled3,1023,1020±15.50
Field goals madeReconciled1,0791,0790±5.40
Field goals attemptedReconciled2,1982,1980±11.00
3-pointers madeReconciled3323320±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled9579570±4.80
Free throws madeReconciled6126120±3.10
Free throws attemptedReconciled8408400±4.20
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsReconciled1,5291,417+112±122.30
AssistsReconciled6346340±3.20
BlocksReconciled130129+1±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown405391+14±12.20
StealsNo team figurenot published281not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published588not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled7,6007,572+27.8±152.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Cameron Boozer83.7%+8.7range +7.2 to +10.0Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Evans70.6%+6.5range +5.1 to +7.9Sufficient evidence
Dame Sarr59.1%+5.7range +4.2 to +7.3Sufficient evidence
Cayden Boozer56.4%+4.0range +2.8 to +5.1Sufficient evidence
Caleb Foster54.4%+4.3range +3.0 to +5.7Sufficient evidence
Maliq Brown50.3%+3.5range +2.2 to +4.6Sufficient evidence
Nikolas Khamenia49.5%+4.4range +2.7 to +5.6Sufficient evidence
Patrick Ngongba46.6%+7.1range +5.9 to +8.2Sufficient evidence
Darren Harris22.9%+1.0range -0.2 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Cameron Sheffield2.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jack Scott2.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ifeanyi Ufochukwu1.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+14.8range +13.8 to +15.7Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 98.7% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value