Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Alabama

SEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 40 · Raw net 11.3 · Tempo 74.2 · 35 Division I games · Through 2026-03-27

All seasons
Record
25–10
25 wins
AdjNet
21.2β
rank 16 of 365
AdjO
124.7β
rank 5 of 365
AdjD
103.5β
rank 63 of 365
AdjT
73.1β
SOS
12.8β
rank 2 of 363
NCSOS
9.3β
WAB
7.2β
rank 15 of 363
RR
2.1β
Exp. W
22.9β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.122.15110.7233108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%55.23349.27351.4
TO / 100 poss.13.1912.835916.7
Offensive rebound %32.411232.829630.6
FTA / FGA %36.015132.010335.0
Shooting
3P%35.86533.817133.9
2P%57.02848.34651.7
FT%76.73969.63572.5
Style
3PA / FGA %54.335.439.5
Assists / FGM %54.347.152.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %11.212.69.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %42.329.731.4
2-pointers %37.751.848.8
Free throws %20.018.519.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
9.7
Top Three Share of Minutes
39%
Bench Share of Minutes
38%
Players with Logged Minutes
18

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03North DakotaW 91–6274.0Home1–0
11-08St. John's (NY)W 103–9684.2Away2–0
11-13PurdueL 80–8768.8Home2–1
11-19IllinoisW 90–8678.7Neutral3–1
11-24GonzagaL 85–9576.6Neutral3–2
11-26UNLVW 115–7678.6—4–2
11-27MarylandW 105–7276.4—5–2
12-03ClemsonW 90–8472.0Home6–2
12-07UTSAW 97–5577.5Home7–2
12-13ArizonaL 75–9676.0Neutral7–3
12-17South Fla.W 104–9378.9Home8–3
12-21Kennesaw St.W 92–8178.7Neutral9–3
12-29YaleW 102–7869.0Home10–3
01-03KentuckyW 89–7471.7Home11–3
01-07VanderbiltL 90–9682.9Away11–4
01-10TexasL 88–9271.5Home11–5
01-13Mississippi St.W 97–8276.8Away12–5
01-17OklahomaW 83–8174.9Away13–5
01-24TennesseeL 73–7967.1Home13–6
01-27MissouriW 90–6474.1Home14–6
02-01FloridaL 77–10077.3Away14–7
02-04Texas A&MW 100–9778.3Home15–7
02-07AuburnW 96–9274.7Away16–7
02-11Ole MissW 93–7473.8Away17–7
02-14South CarolinaW 89–7575.7Home18–7
02-18ArkansasW 117–115 2OT87.6Home19–7
02-21LSUW 90–8371.0Away20–7
02-25Mississippi St.W 100–7575.9Home21–7
02-28TennesseeW 71–6963.0Away22–7
03-03GeorgiaL 88–9874.7Away22–8
03-07AuburnW 96–8471.2Home23–8
03-13Ole MissL 79–8073.5Neutral23–9
03-20HofstraW 90–7069.7—24–9
03-22Texas TechW 90–6569.3—25–9
03-27MichiganL 77–9071.1—25–10

Roster · 18 players

Player logs in 35 of 35 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groupsMinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Labaron Philon3330:5072.2%22.03.55.01.20.22.51.6162–28257.4%81–20339.9%158–19879.8%58.5%63.4%40.8%535:07 +4:1787.8%24.4 +2.4
Amari Allen3228:1664.2%11.46.93.11.00.71.43.074–13355.6%47–13834.1%76–10373.8%53.3%57.7%38.0%526:00 −2:1665.0%9.6 −1.8
Aiden Sherrell3424:0157.9%11.16.21.10.62.20.92.1103–16164.0%27–8033.8%92–12971.3%59.5%63.6%53.5%526:33 +2:3266.4%11.8 +0.7
Houston Mallette3523:1757.8%6.64.51.10.60.00.41.811–2250.0%59–16635.5%31–3588.6%52.9%56.5%18.6%522:57 −0:2057.4%4.2 −2.4
Aden Holloway2828:3156.6%16.82.83.80.60.01.51.877–14553.1%74–16943.8%95–11086.4%59.9%65.0%35.0%226:41 −1:5026.7%19.5 +2.7
Latrell Wrightsell Jr.2726:5751.6%13.23.11.91.10.00.92.141–7951.9%76–21136.0%46–5879.3%53.4%56.4%20.0%528:12 +1:1570.5%11.6 −1.6
Taylor Bol Bowen3018:5540.3%6.34.20.50.41.00.62.032–5261.5%29–9630.2%39–4979.6%51.0%56.0%33.1%520:32 +1:3751.3%6.4 +0.1
London Jemison3315:3536.5%6.23.40.40.60.30.61.940–7156.3%31–8934.8%32–5360.4%54.1%55.9%33.1%517:03 +1:2942.6%6.2 0.0
Noah Williamson338:0819.0%1.31.50.30.30.30.51.810–1855.6%†5–3016.7%†9–1464.3%†36.5%†40.6%†29.2%†57:06 −1:0217.8%3.2 +1.9
Jalil Bethea267:4714.3%3.91.70.50.20.10.50.814–2948.3%†16–5131.4%25–3180.6%47.5%†53.9%†38.8%†54:26 −3:2111.1%1.2 −2.7
Davion Hannah1012:358.9%3.31.90.80.70.21.00.98–1553.3%†4–1136.4%†5–862.5%†53.8%†55.9%†30.8%†————
Keitenn Bristow1012:338.9%3.64.00.50.60.60.82.811–2445.8%†1–911.1%†11–1573.3%†37.9%†45.5%†45.5%†————
Charles BediakoFew games521:437.7%10.04.60.20.81.40.82.417–2181.0%†0–10.0%†16–2369.6%†77.3%†77.8%†104.5%†————
Preston Murphy Jr.Few gamesUnder 100 minutes81:380.9%0.30.50.40.00.00.10.30–10.0%†0–20.0%†2–2100.0%†0.0%†25.8%†66.7%†31:13 −0:251.8%0.0 −0.3
Jacob MartinUnder 100 minutes101:040.8%0.30.10.10.00.30.00.11–1100.0%†0–0—1–250.0%†100.0%†79.8%†200.0%†30:53 −0:111.3%0.0 −0.3
Collins OnyejiakaFew gamesUnder 100 minutes23:530.6%1.03.00.00.00.01.02.01–250.0%†0–0—0–20.0%†50.0%†34.7%†100.0%†————
Jack FaganFew gamesUnder 100 minutes10:080.0%0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–0—0–0—0–0————————
Klark JamesFew gamesUnder 100 minutes10:080.0%0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–0—0–0—0–0————————
Team, games with logs · per game35 games91.240.716.3not published5.09.8not published602–105657.0%450–125635.8%638–83276.7%55.2%59.6%36.0%
Sum of players91.236.916.36.45.09.518.5Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.90.0not published0.0+0.3not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$3.55M
80% Range $2.55M to $4.95M
Tier
Power 4
medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$3.55M in all four
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
18
5 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Labaron Philon73.4%$550K$350K to $860K15.2%$550K in all four$19KSufficient evidence
Amari Allen64.9%$385K$200K to $605K11.3%$385K in all four$19KSufficient evidence
Aiden Sherrell58.8%$675K$425K to $1.25M18.3%$675K in all four$19KSufficient evidence
Houston Mallette57.4%$325K$170K to $490K9.6%$325K in all four$19KSufficient evidence
Aden Holloway57.2%$490K$320K to $765K13.3%$490K in all four$19KSufficient evidence
Latrell Wrightsell Jr.54.6%$390K$240K to $605K11.1%$390K in all four$19KSufficient evidence
Taylor Bol Bowen39.0%$150K$34K to $270K4.4%$150K in all four$19KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
London Jemison35.6%$160K$52K to $270K4.7%$160K in all four$19KSufficient evidence
Noah Williamson17.9%$56K$18K to $115K1.7%$56K in all four$19KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalil Bethea15.2%$48K$16K to $100K1.5%$48K in all four$19KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Keitenn Bristow8.9%$37K$16K to $69K1.1%$37K in all four$19KLimited evidence
Charles Bediako8.3%$50K$25K to $80K1.5%$50K in all four$19KLimited evidence
Davion Hannah6.5%$39K$21K to $64K1.2%$39K in all four$19KLimited evidence
Preston Murphy Jr.0.9%$19K$11K to $31K0.5%$19K in all four$19KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Collins Onyejiaka0.7%$19K$11K to $31K0.5%$19K in all four$19KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jacob Martin0.5%$19K$11K to $31K0.5%$19K in all four$19KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jack Fagan0.0%$19K$11K to $31K0.5%$19K in all four$19KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Klark James0.0%$19K$11K to $31K0.5%$19K in all four$19KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool—$3.55M$2.55M to $4.95M100%$3.55M in all four—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, The University of Alabama (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$24,406,961
Men's basketball expenses$15,230,030
Athletics department expenses$229,908,712
Athletics department revenue$244,551,544

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 35 games, 2,615 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points91.282.7
Field goals made30.129.6
Field goals attempted66.168.6
3-pointers made12.98.2
3-pointers attempted35.924.3
Free throws made18.215.3
Free throws attempted23.822.0
Offensive rebounds12.513.8
Defensive rebounds28.226.1
Total rebounds40.739.9
Assists16.313.9
Blocks5.03.8
Turnovers9.89.5
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 225.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 647.
Minutes (derived)201.4not published

35 of 35 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled3,1923,1920±16.00
Field goals madeReconciled1,0521,0520±5.30
Field goals attemptedReconciled2,3122,3120±11.60
3-pointers madeReconciled4504500±2.30
3-pointers attemptedReconciled1,2561,2560±6.30
Free throws madeReconciled6386380±3.20
Free throws attemptedReconciled8328320±4.20
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown1,4251,290+135±114.00
AssistsReconciled5715710±2.90
BlocksReconciled1741740±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown343332+11±10.30
StealsNo team figurenot published225not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published647not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled7,0507,024+26.3±141.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Labaron Philon73.4%+3.8range +2.6 to +5.4Sufficient evidence
Amari Allen64.9%+2.8range +1.6 to +4.2Sufficient evidence
Aiden Sherrell58.8%+6.3range +4.7 to +7.6Sufficient evidence
Houston Mallette57.4%+2.7range +1.5 to +3.6Sufficient evidence
Aden Holloway57.2%+4.6range +3.4 to +5.5Sufficient evidence
Latrell Wrightsell Jr.54.6%+3.7range +2.2 to +5.0Sufficient evidence
Taylor Bol Bowen39.0%+1.2range -0.3 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
London Jemison35.6%+1.5range +0.3 to +2.7Sufficient evidence
Noah Williamson17.9%-0.3range -1.3 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Jalil Bethea15.2%-0.4range -1.5 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Keitenn Bristow8.9%-0.4range -1.1 to +0.4Limited evidence
Charles Bediako8.3%+1.2range +0.1 to +2.5Limited evidence
Davion Hannah6.5%+0.9range +0.1 to +1.7Limited evidence
Preston Murphy Jr.0.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Collins Onyejiaka0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jacob Martin0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jack Fagan0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Klark James0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+12.5range +11.6 to +13.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

13 valued players hold 99.6% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 4.7%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value