Hawaii

BW · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 46 · Raw net 10.3 · Tempo 72.4 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-19

Record: 22–9; 22 wins
AdjNet: 5.3β; rank 98 of 365
AdjO: 106.7β; rank 209 of 365
AdjD: 101.4β; rank 38 of 365
AdjT: 70.5β
SOS: -4.3β; rank 300 of 363
NCSOS: -12.0β
WAB: -3.7β; rank 85 of 363
RR: -0.1β
Exp. W: 22.1β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	107.9186	97.510	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.0148	46.819	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	18.8315	16.8169	16.7
Offensive rebound %	31.3153	25.311	30.6
FTA / FGA %	41.438	35.6200	35.0
Shooting
3P%	31.7299	30.313	33.9
2P%	54.958	47.537	51.7
FT%	73.5154	70.156	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	39.8	32.3	39.5
Assists / FGM %	49.8	39.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.8	8.8	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	28.2	24.8	31.4
2-pointers %	49.2	54.2	48.8
Free throws %	22.7	21.0	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.7
Top Three Share of Minutes: 42%
Bench Share of Minutes: 35%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-04	Oregon	L 59–60	75.7	Away	0–1
11-10	East Texas A&M	W 100–74	77.4	—	1–1
11-13	Mississippi Val.	W 88–56	66.5	—	2–1
11-15	Manhattan	W 86–56	72.4	—	3–1
11-16	Utah Tech	W 68–62	70.5	—	4–1
11-21	Arizona St.	L 76–83	75.5	—	4–2
11-29	North Dakota	W 92–55	77.5	—	5–2
12-05	UC Davis	W 75–69	71.3	—	6–2
12-07	Cal St. Fullerton	W 69–59	72.8	—	7–2
12-14	UTEP	W 66–61	64.1	—	8–2
01-01	UC Riverside	W 88–45	63.4	Away	9–2
01-03	UC San Diego	L 73–83	67.6	Away	9–3
01-11	UC Irvine	W 67–66	71.2	—	10–3
01-15	Cal Poly	W 86–66	77.9	Away	11–3
01-17	UC Santa Barbara	L 62–77	62.1	Away	11–4
01-23	CSU Bakersfield	W 98–71	77.3	—	12–4
01-25	CSUN	W 89–68	77.4	—	13–4
01-29	UC Irvine	L 76–87 1OT	84.9	Away	13–5
01-31	Long Beach St.	W 89–82	72.1	Away	14–5
02-08	UC San Diego	W 72–67	74.2	—	15–5
02-12	CSU Bakersfield	W 89–74	72.3	Away	16–5
02-14	CSUN	L 60–84	71.7	Away	16–6
02-20	Cal Poly	L 75–86	82.4	—	16–7
02-21	UC Santa Barbara	W 78–75 1OT	74.0	Home	17–7
02-26	UC Davis	W 77–73	68.8	Away	18–7
02-28	Cal St. Fullerton	W 87–85	71.9	Away	19–7
03-06	UC Riverside	W 93–74	71.8	Home	20–7
03-08	Long Beach St.	L 75–84	76.6	Home	20–8
03-13	Cal St. Fullerton	W 78–63	73.5	Neutral	21–8
03-14	UC Irvine	W 71–64	70.6	Neutral	22–8
03-19	Arkansas	L 78–97	76.7	—	22–9

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Hunter Erickson	31	30:55	76.7%	8.2	3.8	3.9	0.8	0.5	2.5	2.0	52–94	55.3%	36–104	34.6%	43–61	70.5%	53.5%	56.7%	30.8%	5	32:04 +1:10	80.2%	9.4 +1.2
Dre Bullock	31	29:03	72.0%	13.9	5.9	1.9	1.8	0.5	1.9	1.8	115–222	51.8%	33–129	25.6%	102–135	75.6%	46.9%	52.5%	38.5%	5	33:37 +4:34	84.0%	15.6 +1.7
Gytis Nemeiksa	31	24:03	59.7%	9.0	4.6	0.9	0.6	0.6	1.1	2.1	73–136	53.7%	23–83	27.7%	64–86	74.4%	49.1%	54.3%	39.3%	5	22:55 −1:09	57.3%	5.8 −3.2
Harry Rouhliadeff	29	25:34	59.3%	10.4	4.8	1.2	0.5	0.5	1.6	2.6	74–125	59.2%	33–81	40.7%	55–69	79.7%	60.0%	63.9%	33.5%	5	25:28 −0:06	63.7%	11.6 +1.2
Isaac Finlinson	31	23:26	58.1%	9.4	3.8	0.8	0.6	0.3	1.3	1.7	65–118	55.1%	32–81	39.5%	66–101	65.3%	56.8%	60.0%	50.8%	5	30:26 +7:00	76.1%	11.2 +1.8
Isaac Johnson	31	21:29	53.3%	14.3	5.9	1.1	0.6	1.1	1.9	2.6	110–182	60.4%	37–114	32.5%	113–129	87.6%	55.9%	62.9%	43.6%	5	21:54 +0:25	54.7%	16.6 +2.3
Isaiah Kerr	30	20:25	49.0%	6.6	2.5	1.3	0.7	0.3	1.0	1.8	43–76	56.6%	24–84	28.6%	41–58	70.7%	49.4%	53.6%	36.3%	5	22:44 +2:19	56.8%	6.8 +0.2
Aaron Hunkin-Claytor	15	28:24	34.1%	5.3	2.7	3.8	0.9	0.1	1.9	2.1	21–48	43.8%†	6–18	33.3%†	20–30	66.7%	45.5%†	50.5%†	45.5%†	—	—	—	—
Yacine Toumi	28	9:43	21.8%	4.0	2.3	0.3	0.3	0.4	0.8	1.8	36–65	55.4%†	0–0	—	39–65	60.0%	55.4%†	59.3%†	100.0%†	5	9:15 −0:28	23.1%	1.6 −2.4
AJ EconomouUnder 100 minutes	17	5:19	7.2%	1.2	0.5	0.1	0.2	0.0	0.5	0.8	5–8	62.5%†	2–17	11.8%†	4–7	57.1%†	32.0%†	35.6%†	28.0%†	3	0:26 −4:53	0.7%	0.0 −1.2
Jalen MyersFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	8:40	4.2%	2.2	0.8	0.5	0.2	0.0	0.3	0.8	5–13	38.5%†	0–3	0.0%†	3–6	50.0%†	31.3%†	34.9%†	37.5%†	—	—	—	—
Hunter CarterUnder 100 minutes	12	3:00	2.9%	1.2	0.8	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.4	0.3	1–5	20.0%†	3–9	33.3%†	3–5	60.0%†	39.3%†	43.2%†	35.7%†	3	0:26 −2:34	0.7%	0.7 −0.5
Team, games with logs · per game	31 games			78.7	38.6	13.3	not published	4.0	13.7	not published	600–1092	54.9%	229–723	31.7%	553–752	73.5%	52.0%	56.9%	41.4%
Sum of players				78.7	34.9	13.3	6.5	4.0	13.2	17.7	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.7	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.5	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $340K; 80% Range $125K to $905K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $275K to $370K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 12; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Hunter Erickson	77.5%	$58K	$20K to $170K	17.0%	$47K to $64K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dre Bullock	73.1%	$42K	$12K to $120K	13.4%	$34K to $47K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Harry Rouhliadeff	66.7%	$35K	$10K to $105K	11.7%	$28K to $38K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaac Finlinson	63.2%	$26K	$6K to $81K	9.2%	$21K to $28K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Gytis Nemeiksa	57.2%	$28K	$8K to $82K	9.7%	$23K to $31K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Kerr	54.8%	$41K	$14K to $120K	12.1%	$34K to $45K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaac Johnson	54.7%	$59K	$20K to $190K	16.4%	$48K to $65K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Aaron Hunkin-Claytor	23.5%	$13K	$4K to $37K	4.3%	$10K to $14K	$3K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Yacine Toumi	17.7%	$7K	$2K to $22K	2.3%	$5K to $7K	$3K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
AJ Economou	6.4%	$3K	$1K to $8K	0.8%	$2K to $3K	$3K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Hunter Carter	2.9%	$3K	$1K to $8K	0.8%	$2K to $3K	$3K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalen Myers	2.3%	$3K	$1K to $8K	0.8%	$2K to $3K	$3K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$340K	$125K to $905K	100%	$275K to $370K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Hawaii at Manoa (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,239,771
Men's basketball expenses	$3,199,708
Athletics department expenses	$53,793,049
Athletics department revenue	$53,793,049

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 31 games, 2,262 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	78.7	71.2
Field goals made	26.7	25.2
Field goals attempted	58.5	60.0
3-pointers made	7.4	5.9
3-pointers attempted	23.3	19.4
Free throws made	17.8	15.0
Free throws attempted	24.3	21.4
Offensive rebounds	10.8	9.4
Defensive rebounds	27.8	23.8
Total rebounds	38.6	33.3
Assists	13.3	10.0
Blocks	4.0	3.1
Turnovers	13.7	12.3
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 202.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 550.
Minutes (derived)	201.6	not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,440	2,440	0	±12.2	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	829	829	0	±4.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,815	1,815	0	±9.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	229	229	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	723	723	0	±3.6	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	553	553	0	±2.8	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	752	752	0	±3.8	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,197	1,081	+116	±95.8	0
Assists	Reconciled	413	413	0	±2.1	0
Blocks	Reconciled	124	124	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	426	409	+17	±12.8	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	202	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	550	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,250	6,227	+22.6	±125.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Hunter Erickson	77.5%	+2.4range +1.0 to +3.9Sufficient evidence
Dre Bullock	73.1%	+1.6range +0.5 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Harry Rouhliadeff	66.7%	+1.4range +0.2 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Isaac Finlinson	63.2%	+0.7range -0.2 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Gytis Nemeiksa	57.2%	+1.0range -0.1 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Kerr	54.8%	+2.4range +1.2 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Isaac Johnson	54.7%	+3.7range +2.4 to +4.8Sufficient evidence
Aaron Hunkin-Claytor	23.5%	+1.0range -0.3 to +2.1Limited evidence
Yacine Toumi	17.7%	-0.3range -1.0 to +0.2Limited evidence
AJ Economou	6.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Hunter Carter	2.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jalen Myers	2.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.9range +10.0 to +11.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 97.7% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 8.2%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value