Texas

SEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 65 · Raw net 8.2 · Tempo 68.2 · 35 Division I games · Through 2026-03-26

Record: 20–15; 20 wins
AdjNet: 14.8β; rank 37 of 365
AdjO: 120.3β; rank 16 of 365
AdjD: 105.5β; rank 102 of 365
AdjT: 67.7β
SOS: 9.2β; rank 23 of 363
NCSOS: -3.1β
WAB: 1.1β; rank 43 of 363
RR: 0.4β
Exp. W: 19.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	119.023	110.9238	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	54.165	50.8144	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.068	13.0354	16.7
Offensive rebound %	35.435	26.934	30.6
FTA / FGA %	44.27	39.6297	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.1107	34.7229	33.9
2P%	54.861	50.1103	51.7
FT%	74.4112	74.4292	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	35.8	33.0	39.5
Assists / FGM %	43.7	46.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	7.6	10.0	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	26.7	26.2	31.4
2-pointers %	49.9	51.3	48.8
Free throws %	23.3	22.5	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 31%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-04	Duke	L 60–75	66.6	Neutral	0–1
11-08	Lafayette	W 97–60	68.9	Home	1–1
11-12	FDU	W 93–58	73.2	Home	2–1
11-15	Kansas City	W 71–55	64.0	Home	3–1
11-18	Rider	W 99–65	74.8	Home	4–1
11-24	Arizona St.	L 86–87	75.0	Neutral	4–2
11-26	NC State	W 102–97	72.0	Neutral	5–2
12-03	Virginia	L 69–88	65.3	Home	5–3
12-08	Southern U.	W 95–69	71.5	Home	6–3
12-12	UConn	L 63–71	66.2	Away	6–4
12-16	Le Moyne	W 95–53	73.9	Home	7–4
12-22	UMES	W 94–71	70.5	Home	8–4
01-03	Mississippi St.	L 98–101 1OT	82.4	Home	8–5
01-06	Tennessee	L 71–85	67.1	Away	8–6
01-10	Alabama	W 92–88	71.5	Away	9–6
01-14	Vanderbilt	W 80–64	66.3	Home	10–6
01-17	Texas A&M	L 70–74	62.2	Home	10–7
01-21	Kentucky	L 80–85	69.1	Away	10–8
01-24	Georgia	W 87–67	65.8	Home	11–8
01-28	Auburn	L 82–88	63.7	Away	11–9
01-31	Oklahoma	W 79–69	66.9	Away	12–9
02-03	South Carolina	W 84–75	68.3	Home	13–9
02-07	Ole Miss	W 79–68	63.5	Home	14–9
02-14	Missouri	W 85–68	64.5	Away	15–9
02-17	LSU	W 88–85	68.6	Home	16–9
02-21	Georgia	L 80–91	62.0	Away	16–10
02-25	Florida	L 71–84	64.5	Home	16–11
02-28	Texas A&M	W 76–70	68.8	Away	17–11
03-04	Arkansas	L 85–105	79.0	Away	17–12
03-07	Oklahoma	L 85–88 1OT	77.5	Home	17–13
03-11	Ole Miss	L 66–76	69.7	Neutral	17–14
03-17	NC State	W 68–66	67.7	—	18–14
03-19	BYU	W 79–71	67.0	—	19–14
03-21	Gonzaga	W 74–68	64.0	—	20–14
03-26	Purdue	L 77–79	60.8	—	20–15

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 35 of 35 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Dailyn Swain	35	32:48	81.4%	17.3	7.5	3.6	1.6	0.3	2.7	2.2	174–292	59.6%	32–92	34.8%	161–198	81.3%	57.8%	64.2%	51.6%	5	37:58 +5:10	94.9%	15.0 −2.3
Jordan Pope	35	28:51	71.6%	13.1	2.1	1.7	0.4	0.1	0.9	2.0	62–143	43.4%	83–226	36.7%	84–100	84.0%	50.5%	55.3%	27.1%	5	34:12 +5:22	85.5%	12.2 −0.9
Tramon Mark	35	28:28	70.7%	13.8	3.4	1.7	0.9	0.5	1.1	1.9	129–231	55.8%	48–144	33.3%	82–109	75.2%	53.6%	57.2%	29.1%	5	30:43 +2:15	76.8%	15.8 +2.0
Matas Vokietaitis	35	26:32	65.9%	15.5	7.0	0.7	0.2	0.9	2.0	3.5	178–292	61.0%	0–0	—	188–281	66.9%	61.0%	65.4%	96.2%	5	27:29 +0:56	68.7%	14.8 −0.7
Camden Heide	34	22:38	54.6%	5.8	2.7	0.6	0.4	0.1	0.4	2.5	21–36	58.3%	48–106	45.3%	12–17	70.6%†	65.5%	66.2%	12.0%	5	18:36 −4:02	46.5%	3.8 −2.0
Chendall Weaver	35	20:38	51.2%	5.8	4.1	1.1	0.8	0.1	0.6	2.0	63–116	54.3%	10–44	22.7%†	48–68	70.6%	48.8%	53.7%	42.5%	5	16:59 −3:39	42.5%	5.8 0.0
Simeon Wilcher	35	18:24	45.7%	5.4	1.8	1.7	0.6	0.3	1.2	1.9	30–78	38.5%	29–86	33.7%	42–46	91.3%	44.8%	51.3%	28.0%	5	12:39 −5:45	31.6%	0.8 −4.6
Nic Codie	23	16:44	27.3%	3.9	3.0	0.8	0.1	0.6	0.6	1.3	34–63	54.0%†	2–14	14.3%†	16–25	64.0%	48.1%†	51.1%†	32.5%†	5	20:54 +4:10	52.3%	4.6 +0.7
Lassina Traore	22	15:14	23.8%	3.2	4.7	0.6	0.5	0.3	1.0	2.2	18–43	41.9%†	0–1	0.0%†	34–50	68.0%	40.9%†	53.0%†	113.6%†	—	—	—	—
Declan Duru Jr.Under 100 minutes	11	5:48	4.5%	0.9	1.1	0.0	0.5	0.1	0.3	0.5	5–7	71.4%†	0–5	0.0%†	0–3	0.0%†	41.7%†	37.5%†	25.0%†	—	—	—	—
Anthon McDermottFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	2:23	1.0%	1.0	0.5	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.2	0.0	0–0	—	2–4	50.0%†	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Cole BottFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	1:08	0.4%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Brandon TaylorFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	0:45	0.2%	0.8	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.3	0–1	0.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	0–0	—	30.0%†	30.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	35 games			81.7	36.9	12.1	not published	2.9	10.3	not published	714–1302	54.8%	255–726	35.1%	667–897	74.4%	54.1%	59.0%	44.2%
Sum of players				81.7	33.9	12.1	5.5	2.9	10.0	18.5	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+2.9	0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.3	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.90M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Dailyn Swain	81.4%	$715K	$475K to $1.15M	19.4%	$715K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Jordan Pope	72.1%	$500K	$290K to $760K	14.3%	$500K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Tramon Mark	70.9%	$385K	$150K to $605K	11.5%	$385K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Matas Vokietaitis	66.5%	$650K	$420K to $1.10M	17.6%	$650K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Camden Heide	56.3%	$290K	$88K to $475K	8.7%	$290K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Chendall Weaver	50.6%	$285K	$98K to $475K	8.5%	$285K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Simeon Wilcher	46.9%	$365K	$220K to $590K	10.0%	$365K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Nic Codie	25.1%	$80K	$24K to $170K	2.4%	$80K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Lassina Traore	23.6%	$94K	$28K to $175K	2.8%	$94K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Declan Duru Jr.	4.8%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Anthon McDermott	1.1%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Cole Bott	0.4%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Brandon Taylor	0.2%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.60M to $4.90M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, The University of Texas at Austin (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$17,377,540
Men's basketball expenses	$22,209,288
Athletics department expenses	$277,413,781
Athletics department revenue	$343,106,827

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 35 games, 2,403 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	81.7	76.1
Field goals made	27.7	26.2
Field goals attempted	57.9	58.1
3-pointers made	7.3	6.7
3-pointers attempted	20.7	19.2
Free throws made	19.1	17.1
Free throws attempted	25.6	23.0
Offensive rebounds	11.9	9.2
Defensive rebounds	25.0	21.6
Total rebounds	36.9	30.8
Assists	12.1	12.0
Blocks	2.9	3.7
Turnovers	10.3	8.9
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 192.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 646.
Minutes (derived)	201.4	not published

35 of 35 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,860	2,860	0	±14.3	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	969	969	0	±4.8	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,028	2,028	0	±10.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	255	255	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	726	726	0	±3.6	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	667	667	0	±3.3	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	897	897	0	±4.5	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,291	1,188	+103	±103.3	0
Assists	Reconciled	423	423	0	±2.1	0
Blocks	Reconciled	103	102	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	361	349	+12	±10.8	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	192	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	646	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,050	7,025	+24.5	±141.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Dailyn Swain	81.4%	+3.6range +2.6 to +4.5Sufficient evidence
Jordan Pope	72.1%	+2.6range +1.4 to +3.6Sufficient evidence
Tramon Mark	70.9%	+1.6range +0.4 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Matas Vokietaitis	66.5%	+4.1range +2.3 to +5.6Sufficient evidence
Camden Heide	56.3%	+1.4range -0.1 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Chendall Weaver	50.6%	+1.6range -0.0 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Simeon Wilcher	46.9%	+2.9range +1.6 to +4.2Sufficient evidence
Nic Codie	25.1%	-0.7range -1.7 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Lassina Traore	23.6%	+0.0range -1.0 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Declan Duru Jr.	4.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Anthon McDermott	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Cole Bott	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Brandon Taylor	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +11.6range +10.7 to +12.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 98.7% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value