Maliq Brown
Duke · 2025–26 · 38 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
764:23 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 38
- Minutes per game
- 20:07
- Points per game
- 4.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.2 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.9 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 2.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.8 | 10.3 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 5.4 |
| Season totals | 188 | 197 | 62 | 68 | 24 | 45 | 103 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 83–132 | 62.9% | 3.5 | 6.9 |
| 2P | 78–102 | 76.5% | 2.7 | 5.3 |
| 3P | 5–30 | 16.7%† | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| FT | 17–34 | 50.0% | 0.9 | 1.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64.8% | 64.0% | 22.7% | 25.8% | 1.38 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Duke · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $240K
- 80% range $110K to $375K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $240K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 50.3%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Duke: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Duke | $240Kspeculative | $110K to $375K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.5 | +2.2 to +4.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | +2.3 | +3.4range +3.0 to +3.8 | 2,488 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Duke | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +4.3 | +2.7 to +5.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +3.1 | +1.2range +1.0 to +1.4 | 1,315 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Syracuse | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.9 | +1.9 to +3.8 | Sufficient evidence | +2.3 | +0.6 | +4.3range +3.8 to +4.9 | 2,829 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Syracuse | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.8 | +0.5 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +0.3 | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.3 | 1,800 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 20:58 | 20:07 | 13:21–30:26 | |
| Points | 5.6 | 4.9 | 0.0–15.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 76.0% | 66.6% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-29 | UConn | L 72–73 | 16:35 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-27 | St. John's (NY) | W 80–75 | 21:40 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-21 | TCU | W 81–58 | 25:08 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 80.0% |
| 2026-03-19 | Siena | W 71–65 | 25:13 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-14 | Virginia | W 74–70 | 16:16 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | Clemson | W 73–61 | 21:15 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Florida St. | W 80–79 | 27:35 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | North Carolina | W 76–61 | 30:26 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6-9 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 72.2% |
| 2026-03-02 | NC State | W 93–64 | 20:09 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Virginia | W 77–51 | 18:56 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Notre Dame | W 100–56 | 21:44 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Michigan | W 68–63 | 18:56 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-16 | Syracuse | W 101–64 | 18:52 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Clemson | W 67–54 | 17:19 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-10 | Pittsburgh | W 70–54 | 23:49 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | North Carolina | L 68–71 | 25:27 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-03 | Boston College | W 67–49 | 24:36 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-31 | Virginia Tech | W 72–58 | 18:13 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-10 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 55.0% |
| 2026-01-26 | Louisville | W 83–52 | 18:24 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Wake Forest | W 90–69 | 25:50 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 125.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Stanford | W 80–50 | 21:55 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | California | W 71–56 | 21:49 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-10 | SMU | W 82–75 | 18:10 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | Louisville | W 84–73 | 27:59 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Florida St. | W 91–87 | 13:42 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Georgia Tech | W 85–79 | 17:39 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Texas Tech | L 81–82 | 23:08 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Lipscomb | W 97–73 | 20:55 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Michigan St. | W 66–60 | 15:00 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Florida | W 67–66 | 19:27 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-27 | Arkansas | W 80–71 | 14:37 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Howard | W 93–56 | 13:36 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Niagara | W 100–42 | 15:48 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Kansas | W 78–66 | 19:15 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-14 | Indiana St. | W 100–62 | 16:22 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Army West Point | W 114–59 | 18:20 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-08 | Western Caro. | W 95–54 | 16:57 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-4 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 112.5% |
| 2025-11-04 | Texas | W 75–60 | 13:21 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 33.3% |