Army West Point

Pat · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 327 · Raw net -11.8 · Tempo 67.2 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-03

Record: 9–21; 9 wins
AdjNet: -14.2β; rank 335 of 365
AdjO: 101.6β; rank 313 of 365
AdjD: 115.9β; rank 333 of 365
AdjT: 68.1β
SOS: -4.8β; rank 317 of 363
NCSOS: -0.2β
WAB: -15.9β; rank 323 of 363
RR: -0.2β
Exp. W: 9.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	103.2286	115.0323	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	49.3279	55.1335	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.2220	15.4257	16.7
Offensive rebound %	29.6219	27.754	30.6
FTA / FGA %	26.8352	39.6298	35.0
Shooting
3P%	32.0278	35.6285	33.9
2P%	50.7223	56.4337	51.7
FT%	71.7215	74.8305	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	53.3	41.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	59.0	53.5	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	5.0	11.3	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	43.5	31.8	31.4
2-pointers %	40.2	47.0	48.8
Free throws %	16.3	21.2	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.9
Top Three Share of Minutes: 42%
Bench Share of Minutes: 35%
Players with Logged Minutes: 18

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-08	St. Thomas (MN)	L 76–83	68.8	Away	0–1
11-11	Duke	L 59–114	77.1	Home	0–2
11-15	Harvard	L 52–75	63.6	Home	0–3
11-18	Cornell	L 73–86	78.3	Away	0–4
11-21	Marist	L 65–76	66.6	Away	0–5
11-25	East Texas A&M	L 67–84	69.0	Neutral	0–6
11-26	FDU	W 81–73	66.8	Away	1–6
11-29	Manhattan	W 81–78 1OT	74.0	Home	2–6
12-02	George Washington	L 70–84	67.5	Home	2–7
12-12	UMBC	W 63–60	66.0	Away	3–7
12-23	Binghamton	W 95–85 1OT	78.3	Home	4–7
12-31	Lehigh	W 85–78 1OT	77.3	Away	5–7
01-03	Colgate	L 69–76	61.0	Home	5–8
01-07	Loyola Maryland	L 76–84 1OT	72.8	Home	5–9
01-10	Boston U.	L 91–100	68.5	Away	5–10
01-14	Holy Cross	L 75–82	67.7	Away	5–11
01-18	American	L 67–78	63.1	Home	5–12
01-21	Bucknell	W 87–84 1OT	69.9	Away	6–12
01-24	Navy	L 56–84	63.1	Away	6–13
01-28	Lehigh	W 67–64	67.4	Home	7–13
01-31	Holy Cross	W 69–68	67.8	Home	8–13
02-04	Colgate	L 55–69	64.3	Away	8–14
02-07	Lafayette	L 60–63	67.3	Home	8–15
02-11	Boston U.	L 68–85	62.5	Home	8–16
02-14	American	L 63–75	65.8	Away	8–17
02-18	Loyola Maryland	W 87–77	69.0	Away	9–17
02-21	Navy	L 63–81	64.0	Home	9–18
02-25	Bucknell	L 73–75	72.4	Home	9–19
02-28	Lafayette	L 77–83	72.5	Away	9–20
03-03	Bucknell	L 55–65	66.9	Away	9–21

Roster · 18 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Ryan Curry	30	34:07	83.6%	13.4	4.1	4.4	1.0	0.1	2.2	2.4	60–118	50.8%	72–221	32.6%	65–80	81.3%	49.6%	53.6%	23.6%	5	35:09 +1:02	87.9%	10.2 −3.2
Jacen Holloway	29	28:39	67.8%	10.7	3.6	2.1	0.4	0.2	1.6	2.2	98–173	56.6%	16–51	31.4%	67–104	64.4%	54.5%	57.6%	46.4%	5	27:48 −0:51	69.5%	12.0 +1.3
Jaxson Bell	29	25:18	59.9%	12.3	5.0	1.6	1.0	0.2	2.0	2.6	57–118	48.3%	50–141	35.5%	92–114	80.7%	51.0%	57.6%	44.0%	5	33:14 +7:56	83.1%	15.6 +3.3
Jackson Furman	30	23:37	57.8%	8.6	3.2	1.3	0.7	0.1	1.8	2.9	32–85	37.6%	52–155	33.5%	37–45	82.2%	45.8%	49.5%	18.8%	5	18:10 −5:27	45.4%	4.0 −4.6
Kevin McCarthy	28	24:45	56.6%	7.2	2.6	1.2	0.5	0.1	0.9	1.8	25–53	47.2%	47–143	32.9%	11–16	68.8%†	48.7%	49.7%	8.2%	4	29:49 +5:05	59.6%	13.5 +6.3
Tate Laczkowski	30	21:40	53.1%	5.3	5.2	1.9	0.8	0.5	1.1	2.4	59–98	60.2%	9–31	29.0%†	14–30	46.7%	56.2%	55.9%	23.3%	5	18:25 −3:15	46.1%	7.8 +2.5
Jorn Everson	30	18:36	45.5%	7.6	2.2	0.8	0.2	0.2	0.7	1.3	57–107	53.3%	34–109	31.2%	11–18	61.1%†	50.0%	50.7%	8.3%	5	15:32 −3:04	38.8%	4.2 −3.4
Joshua Eli	27	14:46	32.5%	4.3	3.6	0.8	0.4	0.1	0.3	1.3	26–59	44.1%†	13–24	54.2%†	24–40	60.0%	54.8%†	57.2%†	48.2%†	5	11:34 −3:12	28.9%	3.6 −0.7
Alex Engro	23	5:32	10.4%	0.8	1.0	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.1	1.0	3–9	33.3%†	3–18	16.7%†	3–6	50.0%†	27.8%†	30.4%†	22.2%†	3	0:46 −4:46	1.1%	0.0 −0.8
Dillon WattUnder 100 minutes	21	4:32	7.8%	1.0	0.1	0.1	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.5	3–9	33.3%†	0–5	0.0%†	16–19	84.2%†	21.4%†	49.2%†	135.7%†	5	2:39 −1:54	6.6%	0.0 −1.0
Dylan BennerUnder 100 minutes	17	5:27	7.6%	1.4	0.6	0.4	0.1	0.2	0.4	1.5	3–3	100.0%†	4–20	20.0%†	5–8	62.5%†	39.1%†	43.4%†	34.8%†	4	8:23 +2:57	16.8%	2.0 +0.6
Jackson MayoUnder 100 minutes	14	5:01	5.7%	1.1	0.7	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.2	0.8	0–1	0.0%†	5–26	19.2%†	1–2	50.0%†	27.8%†	28.7%†	7.4%†	3	8:43 +3:43	13.1%	2.0 +0.9
Dayon PolkFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	6:28	4.8%	0.6	1.0	0.3	0.7	0.0	0.7	0.6	1–2	50.0%†	1–8	12.5%†	0–0	—	25.0%†	25.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Dylan MuransUnder 100 minutes	14	1:46	2.0%	0.4	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.1	2–2	100.0%†	0–5	0.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	28.6%†	31.7%†	28.6%†	2	0:25 −1:21	0.4%	0.0 −0.4
Jahaan GreenFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	2:42	1.8%	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.1	0.3	1–3	33.3%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	33.3%†	33.3%†	0.0%†	1	0:50 −1:52	0.4%	0.0 −0.3
Brendon O'KeefeFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	1:07	0.6%	0.9	0.3	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–2	0.0%†	2–4	50.0%†	0–0	—	50.0%†	50.0%†	0.0%†	2	0:29 −0:37	0.5%	0.0 −0.9
Nnaemeka IkechiFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	3:20	0.5%	0.0	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Chanse PerkinsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	0:43	0.1%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	30 games			70.8	34.4	14.5	not published	1.6	11.8	not published	427–842	50.7%	308–962	32.0%	347–484	71.7%	49.3%	52.7%	26.8%
Sum of players				70.8	30.7	14.5	5.4	1.6	11.2	19.1	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.7	0.0	not published	+0.1	+0.6	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

No EADA match for this school.

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 30 games, 2,059 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	70.8	79.0
Field goals made	24.5	26.9
Field goals attempted	60.1	56.5
3-pointers made	10.3	8.4
3-pointers attempted	32.1	23.5
Free throws made	11.6	16.7
Free throws attempted	16.1	22.4
Offensive rebounds	11.1	8.9
Defensive rebounds	23.3	26.4
Total rebounds	34.4	35.3
Assists	14.5	14.4
Blocks	1.6	3.2
Turnovers	11.8	10.6
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 163.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 573.
Minutes (derived)	204.2	not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,125	2,125	0	±10.6	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	735	735	0	±3.7	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,804	1,804	0	±9.0	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	308	308	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	962	962	0	±4.8	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	347	347	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	484	484	0	±2.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,031	920	+111	±82.5	0
Assists	Reconciled	434	434	0	±2.2	0
Blocks	Reconciled	49	47	+2	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	354	335	+19	±10.6	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	163	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	573	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,125	6,101	+23.6	±122.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Ryan Curry	84.2%	-1.3range -2.3 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Jacen Holloway	67.8%	-1.7range -2.9 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Jaxson Bell	61.2%	-0.7range -1.7 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Jackson Furman	58.4%	-3.8range -5.2 to -2.5Sufficient evidence
Kevin McCarthy	57.1%	-3.0range -4.2 to -1.5Sufficient evidence
Tate Laczkowski	53.3%	+1.5range +0.5 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Jorn Everson	45.2%	-1.0range -2.2 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Joshua Eli	32.8%	+0.2range -0.7 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Alex Engro	9.9%	-0.3range -1.2 to +0.5Limited evidence
Dylan Benner	7.6%	-1.6range -2.6 to -0.9Limited evidence
Dillon Watt	7.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jackson Mayo	5.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Dayon Polk	4.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Dylan Murans	2.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jahaan Green	1.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Brendon O'Keefe	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Nnaemeka Ikechi	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Chanse Perkins	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +7.8range +7.0 to +8.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 95.5% of on-court time. 8 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 4.5%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.5%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value