Georgia Tech

ACC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 252 · Raw net -5.1 · Tempo 71.6 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

Record: 11–20; 11 wins
AdjNet: -0.9β; rank 187 of 365
AdjO: 105.6β; rank 237 of 365
AdjD: 106.4β; rank 124 of 365
AdjT: 71.3β
SOS: 3.9β; rank 85 of 363
NCSOS: -8.0β
WAB: -9.7β; rank 217 of 363
RR: -1.5β
Exp. W: 12.5β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	102.6295	107.7155	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	50.0235	49.994	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	18.6307	15.6246	16.7
Offensive rebound %	29.9203	30.7189	30.6
FTA / FGA %	33.3229	34.2155	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.1109	33.1133	33.9
2P%	48.7291	50.1100	51.7
FT%	71.1236	71.4121	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	33.2	44.4	39.5
Assists / FGM %	59.9	56.3	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	11.5	10.8	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	28.2	35.5	31.4
2-pointers %	52.6	44.8	48.8
Free throws %	19.2	19.7	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.4
Top Three Share of Minutes: 40%
Bench Share of Minutes: 36%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	UMES	W 56–52 1OT	69.9	Home	1–0
11-07	Bryant	W 74–45	74.2	Home	2–0
11-10	Southeastern La.	W 70–60	76.2	Home	3–0
11-14	Georgia	L 87–92	83.6	Away	3–1
11-18	Ga. Southern	W 68–66	75.2	Home	4–1
11-23	West Ga.	W 82–66	72.1	Home	5–1
11-28	DePaul	L 61–75	66.9	Neutral	5–2
11-29	Drake	L 74–84	65.2	Neutral	5–3
12-03	Mississippi St.	L 73–85	75.0	Home	5–4
12-06	Monmouth	W 79–67	70.7	Home	6–4
12-16	Marist	W 87–76	68.4	Home	7–4
12-20	Lafayette	W 95–81	71.1	Home	8–4
12-28	Florida A&M	W 89–65	74.0	Home	9–4
12-31	Duke	L 79–85	71.9	Away	9–5
01-03	Boston College	W 65–53	70.6	Home	10–5
01-06	Syracuse	L 72–82	75.5	Home	10–6
01-10	Miami (FL)	L 81–91	74.5	Away	10–7
01-14	Pittsburgh	L 66–89	67.9	Home	10–8
01-17	NC State	W 78–74	74.1	Away	11–8
01-24	Clemson	L 63–77	66.6	Home	11–9
01-27	Virginia Tech	L 65–71	70.2	Away	11–10
01-31	North Carolina	L 75–91	71.9	Home	11–11
02-04	California	L 85–90	77.1	Away	11–12
02-07	Stanford	L 72–95	72.6	Away	11–13
02-11	Wake Forest	L 67–83	65.4	Home	11–14
02-14	Notre Dame	L 74–89	68.8	Away	11–15
02-18	Virginia	L 68–94	79.1	Home	11–16
02-21	Louisville	L 70–87	73.6	Away	11–17
02-28	Florida St.	L 71–80	64.7	Home	11–18
03-04	California	L 65–76	75.2	Home	11–19
03-07	Clemson	L 76–79	66.2	Away	11–20

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Kowacie Reeves Jr.	29	30:05	70.1%	15.1	3.8	1.2	0.9	0.7	1.4	2.4	96–187	51.3%	60–155	38.7%	67–86	77.9%	54.4%	57.8%	25.1%	5	30:35 +0:30	76.5%	14.8 −0.3
Lamar Washington	29	28:18	65.9%	9.6	4.7	5.1	1.5	0.3	2.7	2.3	73–169	43.2%	19–66	28.8%	74–98	75.5%	43.2%	49.8%	41.7%	5	25:51 −2:27	64.6%	6.4 −3.2
Jaeden Mustaf	29	27:33	64.2%	10.4	4.3	2.4	0.6	0.2	1.5	2.4	79–177	44.6%	21–54	38.9%	80–110	72.7%	47.8%	53.9%	47.6%	5	33:48 +6:15	84.5%	16.8 +6.4
Akai Fleming	30	25:20	61.0%	10.4	3.2	1.3	0.5	0.3	1.7	1.9	67–170	39.4%	28–85	32.9%	93–114	81.6%	42.7%	51.0%	44.7%	5	29:45 +4:26	74.4%	12.8 +2.4
Baye Ndongo	27	27:12	59.0%	11.8	8.1	2.4	0.8	1.0	2.4	2.9	120–211	56.9%	5–14	35.7%†	63–88	71.6%	56.7%	60.3%	39.1%	5	26:44 −0:28	66.8%	8.6 −3.2
Kam Craft	29	20:56	48.8%	7.3	2.1	0.9	0.4	0.3	0.5	1.3	29–72	40.3%	47–129	36.4%	13–17	76.5%†	49.5%	50.8%	8.5%	4	15:29 −5:27	31.0%	5.5 −1.8
Chas Kelley III	29	17:39	41.1%	4.3	1.4	1.6	0.4	0.1	0.9	1.6	17–38	44.7%	28–73	38.4%	6–10	60.0%†	53.2%	53.7%	9.0%	5	16:50 −0:49	42.1%	2.6 −1.7
Mouhamed Sylla	16	21:39	27.8%	9.6	7.2	0.6	0.8	1.2	1.4	2.3	65–110	59.1%	1–4	25.0%†	21–49	42.9%	58.3%	56.8%	43.0%	—	—	—	—
Cole Kirouac	23	11:19	20.9%	1.7	2.3	0.3	0.3	0.3	0.3	1.5	19–30	63.3%†	0–0	—	0–8	0.0%†	63.3%†	56.7%†	26.7%†	5	18:38 +7:19	46.6%	2.8 +1.1
Peyton Marshall	18	10:30	15.2%	3.3	2.9	0.8	0.2	0.8	1.6	1.6	21–37	56.8%†	0–2	0.0%†	17–29	58.6%	53.8%†	57.0%†	74.4%†	1	1:01 −9:29	0.5%	0.0 −3.3
Eric Chatfield Jr	14	12:44	14.3%	2.6	1.0	1.4	0.6	0.0	0.9	1.2	9–17	52.9%†	6–25	24.0%†	0–0	—	42.9%†	42.9%†	0.0%†	1	22:23 +9:39	11.2%	4.0 +1.4
Davi Remagen	11	10:38	9.4%	1.6	1.2	0.7	0.9	0.1	0.5	1.5	7–16	43.8%†	0–6	0.0%†	4–7	57.1%†	31.8%†	35.9%†	31.8%†	—	—	—	—
Brandon Stores Jr.Few gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	4:29	0.4%	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	31 games			73.8	37.1	15.8	not published	4.0	13.4	not published	602–1236	48.7%	215–613	35.1%	438–616	71.1%	50.0%	53.9%	33.3%
Sum of players				73.8	33.5	15.8	6.1	3.9	12.7	18.0	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.6	0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.6	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.60M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.60M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 1 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Kowacie Reeves Jr.	70.4%	$425K	$59K to $685K	12.7%	$425K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Lamar Washington	66.2%	$330K	$28K to $625K	10.2%	$330K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaeden Mustaf	65.5%	$420K	$47K to $765K	12.1%	$420K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Akai Fleming	62.2%	$380K	$36K to $760K	11.0%	$380K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Baye Ndongo	58.1%	$580K	$310K to $1.30M	15.2%	$580K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Kam Craft	46.4%	$220K	$25K to $410K	6.8%	$220K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chas Kelley III	42.9%	$160K	$22K to $330K	5.0%	$160K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mouhamed Sylla	26.4%	$330K	$190K to $950K	8.6%	$330K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Cole Kirouac	22.3%	$150K	$36K to $270K	4.4%	$150K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eric Chatfield Jr	15.0%	$67K	$21K to $130K	2.1%	$67K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Peyton Marshall	14.0%	$135K	$72K to $240K	3.6%	$135K in all four	$27K	Limited evidence
Davi Remagen	10.3%	$87K	$40K to $135K	2.5%	$87K in all four	$27K	Limited evidence
Brandon Stores Jr.	0.4%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.60M	$2.60M to $4.95M	100%	$3.60M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$14,536,539
Men's basketball expenses	$12,013,953
Athletics department expenses	$140,430,227
Athletics department revenue	$140,430,227

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 31 games, 2,228 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	73.8	77.4
Field goals made	26.4	26.5
Field goals attempted	59.6	62.3
3-pointers made	6.9	9.2
3-pointers attempted	19.8	27.6
Free throws made	14.1	15.2
Free throws attempted	19.9	21.3
Offensive rebounds	10.6	11.7
Defensive rebounds	26.4	24.9
Total rebounds	37.1	36.6
Assists	15.8	14.9
Blocks	4.0	4.3
Turnovers	13.4	11.2
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 188.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 559.
Minutes (derived)	200.8	not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,287	2,287	0	±11.4	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	817	817	0	±4.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,849	1,849	0	±9.2	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	215	215	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	613	613	0	±3.1	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	438	438	0	±2.2	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	616	616	0	±3.1	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,149	1,037	+112	±91.9	0
Assists	Reconciled	489	489	0	±2.4	0
Blocks	Reconciled	123	122	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	415	395	+20	±12.4	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	188	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	559	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,225	6,201	+24.2	±124.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Kowacie Reeves Jr.	70.4%	+0.1range -1.0 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Lamar Washington	66.2%	-0.7range -2.1 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Jaeden Mustaf	65.5%	+0.1range -1.4 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Akai Fleming	62.2%	-0.1range -1.4 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Baye Ndongo	58.1%	+1.3range -0.1 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Kam Craft	46.4%	-0.7range -2.0 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Chas Kelley III	42.9%	-1.1range -2.1 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Mouhamed Sylla	26.4%	+1.8range +0.9 to +2.7Sufficient evidence
Cole Kirouac	22.3%	-0.1range -1.2 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Eric Chatfield Jr	15.0%	-1.4range -2.2 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Peyton Marshall	14.0%	+0.7range -0.1 to +1.4Limited evidence
Davi Remagen	10.3%	+0.1range -0.5 to +0.7Limited evidence
Brandon Stores Jr.	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.5range +8.5 to +10.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 99.9% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 0.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 4.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value