SMU

ACC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 64 · Raw net 8.6 · Tempo 70.6 · 34 Division I games · Through 2026-03-18

Record: 20–14; 20 wins
AdjNet: 14.2β; rank 42 of 365
AdjO: 119.7β; rank 26 of 365
AdjD: 105.5β; rank 101 of 365
AdjT: 69.5β
SOS: 8.0β; rank 38 of 363
NCSOS: 0.1β
WAB: -0.8β; rank 57 of 363
RR: -1.2β
Exp. W: 21.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	118.234	109.6211	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	55.626	51.6190	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.7117	16.8163	16.7
Offensive rebound %	35.437	31.6237	30.6
FTA / FGA %	30.4301	32.1107	35.0
Shooting
3P%	37.127	34.1188	33.9
2P%	55.648	52.0197	51.7
FT%	74.3118	71.7133	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	35.9	47.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	54.9	60.9	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	11.1	7.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	29.8	38.6	31.4
2-pointers %	53.3	43.2	48.8
Free throws %	16.9	18.2	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 7.8
Top Three Share of Minutes: 48%
Bench Share of Minutes: 25%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Tarleton St.	W 96–76	72.8	Home	1–0
11-06	A&M-Corpus Christi	W 69–58	68.9	Home	2–0
11-11	Murray St.	W 102–91	81.3	Home	3–0
11-15	Butler	W 87–85	74.5	Home	4–0
11-18	Ark.-Pine Bluff	W 106–60	80.4	Home	5–0
11-21	Arkansas St.	W 100–69	80.1	Home	6–0
11-24	Radford	W 89–72	77.9	Home	7–0
11-28	Mississippi St.	W 87–81 1OT	79.9	Away	8–0
12-03	Vanderbilt	L 69–88	67.8	Away	8–1
12-07	Texas A&M	W 93–80 1OT	84.7	Neutral	9–1
12-13	LSU	L 77–89	64.4	Neutral	9–2
12-21	Central Ark.	W 99–82	70.4	Home	10–2
12-28	Cal St. Fullerton	W 110–63	76.2	Home	11–2
01-03	North Carolina	W 97–83	69.3	Home	12–2
01-07	Clemson	L 70–74	65.6	Away	12–3
01-10	Duke	L 75–82	69.6	Away	12–4
01-14	Virginia Tech	W 77–76	69.2	Home	13–4
01-17	Virginia	L 68–72	62.2	Home	13–5
01-20	Wake Forest	W 91–79	75.5	Away	14–5
01-24	Florida St.	W 83–80	68.0	Home	15–5
01-31	Louisville	L 74–88	74.6	Away	15–6
02-03	NC State	L 83–84	70.1	Home	15–7
02-07	Pittsburgh	W 86–67	66.1	Away	16–7
02-10	Notre Dame	W 89–81	69.1	Home	17–7
02-14	Syracuse	L 78–79	65.3	Away	17–8
02-17	Louisville	W 95–85	76.4	Home	18–8
02-21	Boston College	W 94–70	65.7	Home	19–8
02-25	California	L 69–73	69.7	Away	19–9
02-28	Stanford	L 75–95	64.3	Away	19–10
03-04	Miami (FL)	L 69–77	69.4	Home	19–11
03-07	Florida St.	L 78–91	73.7	Away	19–12
03-10	Syracuse	W 86–69	66.1	Neutral	20–12
03-11	Louisville	L 58–62	61.5	Neutral	20–13
03-18	Miami (OH)	L 79–89	66.3	—	20–14

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 34 of 34 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Boopie Miller	33	35:17	85.0%	19.1	3.8	6.4	1.5	0.1	2.6	2.5	133–268	49.6%	67–162	41.4%	162–187	86.6%	54.3%	61.4%	43.5%	5	38:15 +2:58	95.6%	20.2 +1.1
Jaron Pierre Jr.	34	33:08	82.2%	17.6	4.9	2.1	1.0	0.4	1.9	1.9	142–265	53.6%	80–216	37.0%	75–99	75.8%	54.5%	57.1%	20.6%	5	38:39 +5:31	96.6%	18.0 +0.4
Samet Yigitoglu	34	28:46	71.4%	10.7	7.9	1.6	0.5	1.3	1.7	3.3	155–246	63.0%	0–1	0.0%†	53–107	49.5%	62.8%	61.7%	43.3%	5	32:22 +3:36	80.9%	9.8 −0.9
Corey Washington	34	27:41	68.7%	11.4	4.9	0.9	0.9	0.5	1.0	3.0	79–142	55.6%	45–116	38.8%	93–121	76.9%	56.8%	62.0%	46.9%	5	30:08 +2:28	75.3%	9.8 −1.6
B.J. Edwards	28	33:09	67.7%	12.7	5.9	4.9	2.3	0.2	1.9	1.6	88–161	54.7%	42–113	37.2%	54–70	77.1%	55.1%	58.4%	25.5%	—	—	—	—
Jaden Toombs	27	19:53	39.2%	8.3	4.6	1.1	0.5	0.6	0.8	1.9	90–143	62.9%	6–26	23.1%†	25–38	65.8%	58.6%	60.0%	22.5%	5	28:14 +8:21	70.6%	11.4 +3.1
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.	34	14:49	36.8%	4.5	2.0	0.4	0.5	0.3	0.5	1.0	36–76	47.4%	23–62	37.1%	11–12	91.7%†	51.1%	53.0%	8.7%	5	15:59 +1:11	40.0%	2.2 −2.3
Sam Walters	24	9:16	16.2%	2.6	1.0	0.4	0.0	0.1	0.4	1.2	9–17	52.9%†	15–43	34.9%†	0–1	0.0%†	52.5%†	52.1%†	1.7%†	3	10:56 +1:41	16.4%	3.3 +0.7
B.J. Davis-Ray	32	6:57	16.2%	1.3	0.7	0.4	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.7	11–22	50.0%†	5–23	21.7%†	3–4	75.0%†	41.1%†	42.8%†	8.9%†	5	7:53 +0:56	19.7%	0.6 −0.7
Mitchell Holmes	26	5:14	9.9%	1.7	0.9	0.2	0.1	0.2	0.2	0.8	19–27	70.4%†	0–0	—	5–5	100.0%†	70.4%†	73.6%†	18.5%†	2	1:08 −4:07	1.1%	0.0 −1.7
Chance PuryearUnder 100 minutes	14	2:17	2.3%	0.3	0.4	0.0	0.0	0.1	0.3	0.5	0–2	0.0%†	1–3	33.3%†	1–3	33.3%†	30.0%†	31.6%†	60.0%†	3	1:15 −1:01	1.9%	0.0 −0.3
Nigel WallsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	3:22	2.2%	0.0	0.2	0.2	0.2	0.4	0.2	0.9	0–1	0.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Trey UtterFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	1:15	0.2%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Niccolo Kalischer-StorkFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	0:30	0.1%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.5	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	—	0.0%†	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	34 games			84.1	37.6	16.9	not published	3.6	11.1	not published	762–1370	55.6%	284–766	37.1%	482–649	74.3%	55.6%	59.0%	30.4%
Sum of players				84.1	34.2	16.9	7.0	3.6	10.6	17.0	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.4	0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.5	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.60M; 80% Range $2.55M to $4.90M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.60M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Boopie Miller	84.6%	$835K	$545K to $1.35M	22.6%	$835K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Jaron Pierre Jr.	81.4%	$520K	$290K to $795K	15.1%	$520K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Samet Yigitoglu	71.2%	$620K	$405K to $990K	16.8%	$620K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
B.J. Edwards	70.1%	$550K	$350K to $850K	15.0%	$550K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Corey Washington	69.4%	$405K	$215K to $620K	11.9%	$405K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Jaden Toombs	38.6%	$135K	$29K to $265K	4.1%	$135K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.	36.5%	$155K	$37K to $275K	4.7%	$155K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
B.J. Davis-Ray	16.3%	$43K	$17K to $99K	1.1%	$43K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Sam Walters	16.1%	$55K	$20K to $110K	1.6%	$55K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Mitchell Holmes	10.1%	$55K	$25K to $93K	1.6%	$55K in all four	$25K	Limited evidence
Nigel Walls	2.6%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Chance Puryear	2.5%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Trey Utter	0.2%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Niccolo Kalischer-Stork	0.1%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.60M	$2.55M to $4.90M	100%	$3.60M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Southern Methodist University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$16,735,281	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$16,735,281
Athletics department expenses	$150,225,313
Athletics department revenue	$150,225,313

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 34 games, 2,417 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	84.1	77.9
Field goals made	30.8	26.9
Field goals attempted	62.8	61.8
3-pointers made	8.4	10.0
3-pointers attempted	22.5	29.4
Free throws made	14.2	14.2
Free throws attempted	19.1	19.8
Offensive rebounds	12.3	11.7
Defensive rebounds	25.4	22.4
Total rebounds	37.6	34.1
Assists	16.9	16.4
Blocks	3.6	3.1
Turnovers	11.1	12.0
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 238.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 577.
Minutes (derived)	201.5	not published

34 of 34 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,858	2,858	0	±14.3	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,046	1,046	0	±5.2	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,136	2,136	0	±10.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	284	284	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	766	766	0	±3.8	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	482	482	0	±2.4	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	649	649	0	±3.2	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,279	1,162	+117	±102.3	0
Assists	Reconciled	574	574	0	±2.9	0
Blocks	Reconciled	122	121	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	379	362	+17	±11.4	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	238	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	577	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,850	6,824	+25.6	±137.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Boopie Miller	84.6%	+4.6range +3.4 to +5.9Sufficient evidence
Jaron Pierre Jr.	81.4%	+2.7range +1.5 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
Samet Yigitoglu	71.2%	+4.1range +3.0 to +5.2Sufficient evidence
B.J. Edwards	70.1%	+3.8range +2.4 to +4.7Sufficient evidence
Corey Washington	69.4%	+2.3range +1.3 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Jaden Toombs	38.6%	+0.2range -1.0 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.	36.5%	+0.9range -0.7 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
B.J. Davis-Ray	16.3%	-1.8range -3.2 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Sam Walters	16.1%	-0.6range -2.0 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Mitchell Holmes	10.1%	+0.7range -0.7 to +1.7Limited evidence
Nigel Walls	2.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Chance Puryear	2.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Trey Utter	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Niccolo Kalischer-Stork	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +12.1range +11.1 to +12.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.9% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value

SMU