Cameron Boozer
Duke · 2025–26 · 38 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1270:44 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 38
- Minutes per game
- 33:26
- Points per game
- 22.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 10.2 / 4.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 22.5 | 10.2 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 26.9 | 12.2 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Season totals | 855 | 389 | 157 | 53 | 23 | 96 | 65 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 290–522 | 55.6% | 13.7 | 16.4 |
| 2P | 236–384 | 61.5% | 10.1 | 12.1 |
| 3P | 54–138 | 39.1% | 3.6 | 4.3 |
| FT | 221–280 | 78.9% | 7.4 | 8.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.7% | 66.3% | 26.4% | 53.6% | 1.64 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Duke · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $885K
- 80% range $585K to $1.40M
- Median share of team pool
- 24.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $885K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 83.7%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Duke: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Duke | $885Kspeculative | $585K to $1.40M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +8.7 | +7.2 to +10.0 | Sufficient evidence | +5.2 | +3.5 | +9.6range +8.4 to +10.7 | 4,138 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:47 | 33:26 | 20:32–38:52 | |
| Points | 20.6 | 22.5 | 13.0–35.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 45.0% | 61.9% | 20.6%–95.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-29 | UConn | L 72–73 | 38:39 | 27 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 10-21 | 1-4 | 6-8 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-27 | St. John's (NY) | W 80–75 | 38:25 | 22 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7-16 | 0-1 | 8-9 | 43.8% |
| 2026-03-21 | TCU | W 81–58 | 33:13 | 19 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 7-10 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 70.0% |
| 2026-03-19 | Siena | W 71–65 | 38:24 | 22 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4-11 | 1-5 | 13-14 | 40.9% |
| 2026-03-14 | Virginia | W 74–70 | 35:14 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-17 | 1-5 | 6-9 | 20.6% |
| 2026-03-13 | Clemson | W 73–61 | 37:02 | 24 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 6-9 | 3-4 | 9-12 | 83.3% |
| 2026-03-12 | Florida St. | W 80–79 | 38:52 | 23 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 7-16 | 2-5 | 7-9 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | North Carolina | W 76–61 | 37:16 | 26 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10-17 | 2-4 | 4-6 | 64.7% |
| 2026-03-02 | NC State | W 93–64 | 31:56 | 26 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-10 | 1-2 | 9-11 | 85.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Virginia | W 77–51 | 33:50 | 18 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 11-12 | 38.9% |
| 2026-02-24 | Notre Dame | W 100–56 | 23:47 | 24 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 12-14 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Michigan | W 68–63 | 33:32 | 18 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 5-7 | 65.0% |
| 2026-02-16 | Syracuse | W 101–64 | 25:10 | 22 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 85.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Clemson | W 67–54 | 37:33 | 18 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7-14 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-10 | Pittsburgh | W 70–54 | 37:21 | 17 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 72.2% |
| 2026-02-07 | North Carolina | L 68–71 | 38:11 | 24 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10-21 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 52.4% |
| 2026-02-03 | Boston College | W 67–49 | 33:35 | 19 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-17 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 55.9% |
| 2026-01-31 | Virginia Tech | W 72–58 | 37:11 | 24 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9-12 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-26 | Louisville | W 83–52 | 31:13 | 19 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-16 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 53.1% |
| 2026-01-24 | Wake Forest | W 90–69 | 33:00 | 32 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11-20 | 3-8 | 7-7 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | Stanford | W 80–50 | 32:42 | 30 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12-17 | 2-3 | 4-8 | 76.5% |
| 2026-01-14 | California | W 71–56 | 30:26 | 21 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9-16 | 0-3 | 3-5 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | SMU | W 82–75 | 34:16 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-9 | 2-4 | 6-7 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-06 | Louisville | W 84–73 | 38:48 | 27 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 10-12 | 3-4 | 4-5 | 95.8% |
| 2026-01-03 | Florida St. | W 91–87 | 36:07 | 17 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 7-8 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-31 | Georgia Tech | W 85–79 | 38:01 | 26 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 8-15 | 3-5 | 7-10 | 63.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | Texas Tech | L 81–82 | 36:07 | 23 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7-11 | 0-2 | 9-14 | 63.6% |
| 2025-12-16 | Lipscomb | W 97–73 | 30:35 | 26 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 10-17 | 0-3 | 6-6 | 58.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | Michigan St. | W 66–60 | 33:53 | 18 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7-13 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 57.7% |
| 2025-12-02 | Florida | W 67–66 | 35:21 | 29 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10-21 | 3-9 | 6-7 | 54.8% |
| 2025-11-27 | Arkansas | W 80–71 | 35:32 | 35 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13-18 | 2-4 | 7-11 | 77.8% |
| 2025-11-23 | Howard | W 93–56 | 26:25 | 26 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10-12 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 91.7% |
| 2025-11-21 | Niagara | W 100–42 | 20:32 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5-11 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-18 | Kansas | W 78–66 | 33:01 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-17 | 1-4 | 3-5 | 44.1% |
| 2025-11-14 | Indiana St. | W 100–62 | 29:36 | 35 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13-16 | 2-2 | 7-11 | 87.5% |
| 2025-11-11 | Army West Point | W 114–59 | 27:30 | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 6-6 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Western Caro. | W 95–54 | 22:52 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8-15 | 4-9 | 5-5 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-04 | Texas | W 75–60 | 35:36 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3-12 | 0-4 | 9-12 | 25.0% |