Florida

SEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 8 · Raw net 21.7 · Tempo 72.0 · 35 Division I games · Through 2026-03-22

Record: 27–8; 27 wins
AdjNet: 28.2β; rank 4 of 365
AdjO: 122.5β; rank 9 of 365
AdjD: 94.2β; rank 7 of 365
AdjT: 70.9β
SOS: 10.6β; rank 12 of 363
NCSOS: 5.7β
WAB: 8.1β; rank 7 of 363
RR: -1.4β
Exp. W: 28.4β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	120.98	99.322	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	54.163	46.110	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.3159	15.3270	16.7
Offensive rebound %	43.32	24.87	30.6
FTA / FGA %	39.079	34.0153	35.0
Shooting
3P%	31.2314	32.168	33.9
2P%	58.517	45.18	51.7
FT%	71.2232	72.8203	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	37.0	34.1	39.5
Assists / FGM %	55.0	44.6	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	12.4	7.1	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	25.5	28.0	31.4
2-pointers %	54.1	50.8	48.8
Free throws %	20.4	21.2	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.0
Top Three Share of Minutes: 46%
Bench Share of Minutes: 28%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Arizona	L 87–93	81.7	Neutral	0–1
11-06	North Florida	W 104–64	79.9	Home	1–1
11-11	Florida St.	W 78–76	81.0	Home	2–1
11-16	Miami (FL)	W 82–68	76.8	Neutral	3–1
11-21	Merrimack	W 80–45	65.6	Home	4–1
11-27	TCU	L 80–84	76.3	Neutral	4–2
11-28	Providence	W 90–78	73.6	Neutral	5–2
12-02	Duke	L 66–67	65.2	Away	5–3
12-09	UConn	L 73–77	67.7	Neutral	5–4
12-13	George Washington	W 80–70	71.8	Neutral	6–4
12-17	Saint Francis	W 102–61	72.3	Home	7–4
12-21	Colgate	W 90–60	64.8	Home	8–4
12-29	Dartmouth	W 94–72	74.3	Home	9–4
01-03	Missouri	L 74–76	67.9	Away	9–5
01-06	Georgia	W 92–77	77.9	Home	10–5
01-10	Tennessee	W 91–67	74.3	Home	11–5
01-13	Oklahoma	W 96–79	70.7	Away	12–5
01-17	Vanderbilt	W 98–94	72.8	Away	13–5
01-20	LSU	W 79–61	67.0	Home	14–5
01-24	Auburn	L 67–76	65.4	Home	14–6
01-28	South Carolina	W 95–48	69.9	Away	15–6
02-01	Alabama	W 100–77	77.3	Home	16–6
02-07	Texas A&M	W 86–67	72.0	Away	17–6
02-11	Georgia	W 86–66	75.7	Away	18–6
02-14	Kentucky	W 92–83	76.5	Home	19–6
02-17	South Carolina	W 76–62	67.0	Home	20–6
02-21	Ole Miss	W 94–75	76.9	Away	21–6
02-25	Texas	W 84–71	64.5	Away	22–6
02-28	Arkansas	W 111–77	80.8	Home	23–6
03-03	Mississippi St.	W 108–74	75.1	Home	24–6
03-07	Kentucky	W 84–77	71.6	Away	25–6
03-13	Kentucky	W 71–63	73.1	Neutral	26–6
03-14	Vanderbilt	L 74–91	63.9	Neutral	26–7
03-20	Prairie View	W 114–55	69.3	—	27–7
03-22	Iowa	L 72–73	61.1	—	27–8

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 35 of 35 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Thomas Haugh	34	33:16	80.8%	580	209	73	36	33	51	79	126–222	56.8%	58–178	32.6%	154–199	77.4%	53.3%	59.5%	49.8%	5	33:51 +0:35	84.6%	17.0 −0.1
Boogie Fland	35	29:58	74.9%	406	86	121	61	5	55	72	117–204	57.4%	30–125	24.0%	82–113	72.6%	49.2%	53.6%	34.3%	5	32:44 +2:46	81.8%	12.2 +0.6
Alex Condon	34	30:35	74.3%	513	254	123	23	48	83	94	180–287	62.7%	9–53	17.0%	126–194	64.9%	56.9%	60.3%	57.1%	5	31:03 +0:28	77.6%	16.6 +1.5
Xaivian Lee	35	27:23	68.5%	406	129	147	41	4	61	64	85–143	59.4%	57–195	29.2%	65–85	76.5%	50.4%	54.1%	25.1%	5	28:50 +1:27	72.1%	11.2 −0.4
Rueben Chinyelu	35	24:36	61.5%	382	393	23	27	36	52	103	150–255	58.8%	0–2	0.0%†	82–118	69.5%	58.4%	61.8%	45.9%	5	24:14 −0:22	60.6%	8.6 −2.3
Urban Klavzar	35	20:37	51.5%	335	54	44	12	2	29	52	33–59	55.9%	71–175	40.6%	56–62	90.3%	59.6%	64.1%	26.5%	5	16:11 −4:26	40.4%	6.0 −3.6
Micah Handlogten	34	14:49	36.0%	140	199	25	17	30	24	70	65–101	64.4%	0–1	0.0%†	10–27	37.0%	63.7%	61.5%	26.5%	5	13:04 −1:45	32.7%	2.8 −1.3
Isaiah Brown	33	12:41	29.9%	181	83	20	11	10	15	51	47–85	55.3%	18–52	34.6%	33–45	73.3%	54.0%	57.7%	32.8%	5	13:47 +1:06	34.5%	4.8 −0.7
CJ Ingram II	21	5:12	7.8%	46	19	9	2	3	8	14	8–19	42.1%†	8–16	50.0%†	6–12	50.0%†	57.1%†	57.1%†	34.3%†	1	6:36 +1:24	3.3%	8.0 +5.8
Alex LloydUnder 100 minutes	17	4:31	5.5%	21	13	3	1	1	6	8	4–7	57.1%†	4–19	21.1%†	1–5	20.0%†	38.5%†	37.2%†	19.2%†	1	7:40 +3:09	3.8%	2.0 +0.8
Alex KovatchevUnder 100 minutes	15	3:00	3.2%	8	6	1	1	1	1	1	1–3	33.3%†	2–9	22.2%†	0–0	—	33.3%†	33.3%†	0.0%†	1	5:14 +2:14	2.6%	5.0 +4.5
Viktor MikicUnder 100 minutes	17	2:38	3.2%	22	14	6	0	2	6	9	6–19	31.6%†	1–4	25.0%†	7–13	53.8%†	32.6%†	38.3%†	56.5%†	1	6:36 +3:58	3.3%	2.0 +0.7
Olivier RiouxUnder 100 minutes	11	1:07	0.9%	7	6	1	0	0	1	2	3–6	50.0%†	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	50.0%†	50.9%†	33.3%†	1	1:26 +0:19	0.7%	2.0 +1.4
Cooper JosefsbergFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	0:57	0.2%	3	2	0	0	0	0	0	0–1	0.0%†	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	1	1:26 +0:29	0.7%	0.0 −1.0
Team, games with logs · season totals	35 games			3050	1580	596	not published	175	412	not published	825–1411	58.5%	259–830	31.2%	623–875	71.2%	54.1%	58.1%	39.0%
Sum of players				3050	1467	596	232	175	392	619	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+113	0	not published	0	+20	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 5 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Thomas Haugh	81.0%	$670K	$450K to $1.00M	18.4%	$670K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Boogie Fland	76.3%	$540K	$365K to $785K	15.2%	$540K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Alex Condon	75.1%	$595K	$405K to $890K	16.4%	$595K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Xaivian Lee	68.8%	$445K	$285K to $660K	12.7%	$445K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Rueben Chinyelu	62.2%	$495K	$325K to $735K	13.5%	$495K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Urban Klavzar	50.9%	$295K	$175K to $445K	8.6%	$295K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Micah Handlogten	36.4%	$175K	$85K to $285K	5.2%	$175K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Brown	29.5%	$140K	$63K to $230K	4.1%	$140K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
CJ Ingram II	7.1%	$38K	$20K to $64K	1.1%	$38K in all four	$25K	Limited evidence
Alex Lloyd	5.5%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Alex Kovatchev	3.2%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Viktor Mikic	3.0%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Olivier Rioux	0.9%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Cooper Josefsberg	0.2%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.60M to $4.95M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Florida (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$17,258,007
Men's basketball expenses	$13,427,727
Athletics department expenses	$199,237,539
Athletics department revenue	$199,237,539

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 35 games, 2,522 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	3,050	2,504
Field goals made	1,084	870
Field goals attempted	2,241	2,139
3-pointers made	259	234
3-pointers attempted	830	729
Free throws made	623	530
Free throws attempted	875	728
Offensive rebounds	557	338
Defensive rebounds	1,023	728
Total rebounds	1,580	1,066
Assists	596	388
Blocks	175	100
Turnovers	412	385
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 232.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 619.
Minutes (derived)	7,000	not published

35 of 35 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	3,050	3,050	0	±15.3	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,084	1,084	0	±5.4	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,241	2,241	0	±11.2	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	259	259	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	830	830	0	±4.2	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	623	623	0	±3.1	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	875	875	0	±4.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,580	1,467	+113	±126.4	0
Assists	Reconciled	596	596	0	±3.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	175	175	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	412	392	+20	±12.4	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	232	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	619	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,000	6,974	+26.2	±140.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Thomas Haugh	81.0%	+6.2range +4.8 to +7.4Sufficient evidence
Boogie Fland	76.3%	+5.4range +4.0 to +6.3Sufficient evidence
Alex Condon	75.1%	+5.9range +4.7 to +7.1Sufficient evidence
Xaivian Lee	68.8%	+4.7range +3.3 to +6.0Sufficient evidence
Rueben Chinyelu	62.2%	+5.9range +4.3 to +7.2Sufficient evidence
Urban Klavzar	50.9%	+4.1range +2.9 to +4.9Sufficient evidence
Micah Handlogten	36.4%	+3.1range +1.8 to +4.3Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Brown	29.5%	+2.8range +1.1 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
CJ Ingram II	7.1%	+0.0range -0.8 to +1.1Limited evidence
Alex Lloyd	5.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Alex Kovatchev	3.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Viktor Mikic	3.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Olivier Rioux	0.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Cooper Josefsberg	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +14.1range +13.0 to +15.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 97.5% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.5%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value