North Florida

ASUN · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 348 · Raw net -17.2 · Tempo 71.9 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-04

Record: 5–25; 5 wins
AdjNet: -14.8β; rank 338 of 365
AdjO: 106.5β; rank 214 of 365
AdjD: 121.3β; rank 364 of 365
AdjT: 71.1β
SOS: -0.3β; rank 175 of 363
NCSOS: 9.4β
WAB: -17.8β; rank 346 of 363
RR: -1.8β
Exp. W: 6.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	106.8211	124.0363	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.9106	56.3349	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.9264	12.7362	16.7
Offensive rebound %	25.2335	37.6361	30.6
FTA / FGA %	28.8333	31.492	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.0117	35.1252	33.9
2P%	53.4109	58.7358	51.7
FT%	77.820	70.362	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	51.7	39.0	39.5
Assists / FGM %	50.6	52.2	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	3.5	12.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	42.3	30.5	31.4
2-pointers %	40.3	53.1	48.8
Free throws %	17.5	16.4	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.0
Top Three Share of Minutes: 48%
Bench Share of Minutes: 27%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-06	Florida	L 64–104	79.9	Away	0–1
11-12	Tennessee	L 66–99	76.1	Away	0–2
11-19	Wofford	L 78–86	72.8	Away	0–3
11-22	Southern Miss.	L 83–92	71.5	Neutral	0–4
11-23	Prairie View	L 82–85	73.1	Neutral	0–5
12-02	SIUE	L 63–72	65.2	Home	0–6
12-07	Gonzaga	L 58–109	77.4	Away	0–7
12-13	Dayton	L 61–84	68.8	Away	0–8
12-18	Charleston So.	L 90–113	80.2	Away	0–9
12-21	Miami (FL)	L 67–105	75.2	Away	0–10
12-28	Columbia	L 82–90	71.8	Home	0–11
01-01	Austin Peay	L 83–102	77.9	Away	0–12
01-03	Lipscomb	L 74–82	70.7	Away	0–13
01-08	West Ga.	L 73–85	71.4	Home	0–14
01-10	Queens (NC)	L 82–89	72.6	Home	0–15
01-15	North Ala.	W 105–91	70.3	Away	1–15
01-17	Central Ark.	L 69–98	70.5	Away	1–16
01-22	Eastern Ky.	W 87–85	71.1	Home	2–16
01-24	Bellarmine	W 117–114 1OT	79.2	Home	3–16
01-29	Stetson	L 77–84	69.3	Home	3–17
01-31	Lipscomb	L 94–100	72.9	Home	3–18
02-05	West Ga.	W 81–73	74.3	Away	4–18
02-07	Queens (NC)	L 72–91	69.0	Away	4–19
02-11	FGCU	L 81–90	72.8	Away	4–20
02-14	Jacksonville	L 56–63	58.3	Away	4–21
02-19	Austin Peay	L 76–77	78.0	Home	4–22
02-21	Stetson	L 71–76	63.9	Away	4–23
02-26	FGCU	W 76–70	69.2	Home	5–23
02-28	Jacksonville	L 61–85	69.1	Home	5–24
03-04	West Ga.	L 85–93	75.2	Neutral	5–25

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Kamrin Oriol	30	35:38	88.7%	21.2	2.9	4.2	0.8	0.1	3.3	2.5	119–218	54.6%	95–232	40.9%	112–125	89.6%	58.1%	62.9%	27.8%	5	37:20 +1:42	93.3%	23.4 +2.2
Kent Jackson	30	32:25	80.7%	14.8	3.4	2.2	0.9	0.0	2.0	2.0	50–101	49.5%	99–288	34.4%	48–51	94.1%	51.0%	54.1%	13.1%	5	33:08 +0:43	82.8%	11.6 −3.2
BJ Plummer	30	27:10	67.7%	7.2	3.3	1.1	0.6	0.2	1.2	2.2	43–82	52.4%	37–119	31.1%	20–30	66.7%	49.0%	50.7%	14.9%	5	31:28 +4:18	78.7%	7.0 −0.2
Mason Lee	30	26:16	65.4%	7.8	5.6	1.9	0.6	0.3	1.9	3.2	55–74	74.3%	31–84	36.9%	32–46	69.6%	64.2%	65.9%	29.1%	5	29:42 +3:25	74.2%	7.8 0.0
Dalton Gayman	30	23:46	59.2%	10.2	5.5	1.5	0.6	0.2	1.5	1.9	80–156	51.3%	22–60	36.7%	80–106	75.5%	52.3%	58.3%	49.1%	5	26:11 +2:25	65.5%	13.2 +3.0
Nestor Dyachok	30	15:18	38.1%	4.1	2.2	1.0	0.2	0.1	0.6	2.2	43–69	62.3%†	2–24	8.3%†	32–46	69.6%	49.5%†	54.8%†	49.5%†	5	20:45 +5:27	51.9%	7.6 +3.5
Devin Hines	25	17:07	35.5%	5.3	2.2	0.6	0.6	0.2	1.0	1.4	39–81	48.1%	9–38	23.7%†	28–40	70.0%	44.1%	48.7%	33.6%	5	7:38 −9:30	19.1%	1.6 −3.7
Dante Oliver	29	12:27	30.0%	2.2	1.4	0.4	0.2	0.0	0.2	1.3	7–21	33.3%†	12–32	37.5%†	13–22	59.1%†	47.2%†	50.3%†	41.5%†	5	10:07 −2:20	25.3%	0.2 −2.0
Trey Cady	26	11:32	24.9%	5.4	2.2	0.3	0.2	0.2	0.7	1.6	29–66	43.9%	16–47	34.0%†	35–48	72.9%	46.9%	52.6%	42.5%	3	3:53 −7:39	5.8%	2.3 −3.1
Taylor ThompsonUnder 100 minutes	17	3:38	5.1%	0.2	0.2	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.4	0.5	0–3	0.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	21.4%†	25.4%†	28.6%†	3	1:50 −1:48	2.8%	0.0 −0.2
Gabe JacobsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	2:45	1.8%	1.1	0.4	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.5	0.5	1–1	100.0%†	2–3	66.7%†	1–1	100.0%†	100.0%†	101.4%†	25.0%†	—	—	—	—
Alex VargoFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	8:39	0.7%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	30 games			77.1	31.3	13.4	not published	1.4	12.9	not published	466–872	53.4%	326–932	35.0%	404–519	77.8%	52.9%	56.9%	28.8%
Sum of players				77.1	28.0	13.3	4.6	1.4	12.5	18.3	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				+0.1	+3.3	+0.0	not published	0.0	+0.4	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $200K; 80% Range $75K to $515K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $195K to $210K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 12; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Kamrin Oriol	87.8%	$6K	$1K to $45K	1.5%	$6K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kent Jackson	81.9%	$13K	$1K to $64K	13.0%	$13K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
BJ Plummer	65.8%	$12K	$1K to $56K	9.5%	$11K to $12K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mason Lee	62.3%	$20K	$1K to $84K	12.9%	$19K to $21K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dalton Gayman	60.0%	$8K	$1K to $45K	8.4%	$8K to $9K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Devin Hines	39.1%	$5K	$1K to $24K	2.3%	$4K to $5K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Nestor Dyachok	36.6%	$51K	$12K to $240K	21.9%	$49K to $53K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Trey Cady	29.0%	$5K	$1K to $24K	4.3%	$5K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dante Oliver	28.6%	$11K	$2K to $45K	6.7%	$11K to $12K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Taylor Thompson	5.9%	$2K	$1K to $4K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Gabe Jacobs	1.9%	$2K	$1K to $4K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Alex Vargo	1.0%	$2K	$1K to $4K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$200K	$75K to $515K	100%	$195K to $210K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of North Florida (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,551,133	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$1,551,133
Athletics department expenses	$18,439,060
Athletics department revenue	$18,439,060

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 30 games, 2,167 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	77.1	89.6
Field goals made	26.4	32.9
Field goals attempted	60.1	66.5
3-pointers made	10.9	9.1
3-pointers attempted	31.1	25.9
Free throws made	13.5	14.7
Free throws attempted	17.3	20.9
Offensive rebounds	8.7	13.6
Defensive rebounds	22.6	25.9
Total rebounds	31.3	39.6
Assists	13.4	17.2
Blocks	1.4	3.7
Turnovers	12.9	9.2
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 139.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 550.
Minutes (derived)	200.8	not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,314	2,312	+2	±11.6	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	792	792	0	±4.0	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,804	1,803	+1	±9.0	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	326	326	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	932	931	+1	±4.7	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	404	402	+2	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	519	517	+2	±2.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	940	841	+99	±75.2	0
Assists	Reconciled	401	400	+1	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	42	42	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	387	374	+13	±11.6	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	139	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	550	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,025	5,998	+27.0	±120.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Kamrin Oriol	87.8%	-3.0range -4.1 to -1.9Sufficient evidence
Kent Jackson	81.9%	-1.7range -2.4 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
BJ Plummer	65.8%	-2.0range -3.3 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Mason Lee	62.3%	-1.0range -2.1 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Dalton Gayman	60.0%	-2.0range -3.0 to -1.1Sufficient evidence
Devin Hines	39.1%	-2.8range -3.8 to -1.6Sufficient evidence
Nestor Dyachok	36.6%	+0.9range -0.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Trey Cady	29.0%	-2.0range -3.0 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Dante Oliver	28.6%	-0.8range -1.7 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Taylor Thompson	5.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Gabe Jacobs	1.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Alex Vargo	1.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +7.6range +6.8 to +8.4Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 98.2% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value