Florida

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Florida, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Thomas Haugh	81.0%	+6.2range +4.8 to +7.4Sufficient evidence	+8.2range +7.3 to +9.0Sufficient evidence	$670KspeculativeLoading	$450K to $1.00MLoading
Boogie Fland	76.3%	+5.4range +4.0 to +6.3Sufficient evidence	+7.2range +6.4 to +7.8Sufficient evidence	$540KspeculativeLoading	$365K to $785KLoading
Alex Condon	75.1%	+5.9range +4.7 to +7.1Sufficient evidence	+7.4range +6.5 to +8.2Sufficient evidence	$595KspeculativeLoading	$405K to $890KLoading
Xaivian Lee	68.8%	+4.7range +3.3 to +6.0Sufficient evidence	+6.1range +5.3 to +6.8Sufficient evidence	$445KspeculativeLoading	$285K to $660KLoading
Rueben Chinyelu	62.2%	+5.9range +4.3 to +7.2Sufficient evidence	+5.9range +5.3 to +6.6Sufficient evidence	$495KspeculativeLoading	$325K to $735KLoading
Urban Klavzar	50.9%	+4.1range +2.9 to +4.9Sufficient evidence	+4.1range +3.5 to +4.5Sufficient evidence	$295KspeculativeLoading	$175K to $445KLoading
Micah Handlogten	36.4%	+3.1range +1.8 to +4.3Sufficient evidence	+2.6range +2.2 to +2.9Sufficient evidence	$175KspeculativeLoading	$85K to $285KLoading
Isaiah Brown	29.5%	+2.8range +1.1 to +4.0Sufficient evidence	+2.0range +1.7 to +2.3Sufficient evidence	$140KspeculativeLoading	$63K to $230KLoading
CJ Ingram II	7.1%	+0.0range -0.8 to +1.1Limited evidence	+0.3range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidence	$38KspeculativeLoading	$20K to $64KLoading
Alex Lloyd	5.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$25Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$14K to $40KLoading
Alex Kovatchev	3.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$25Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$14K to $40KLoading
Viktor Mikic	3.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$25Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$14K to $40KLoading
Olivier Rioux	0.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$25Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$14K to $40KLoading
Cooper Josefsberg	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$25Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$14K to $40KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 5 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Thomas Haugh	81.0%	$670K	$450K to $1.00M	18.4%	$670K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Boogie Fland	76.3%	$540K	$365K to $785K	15.2%	$540K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Alex Condon	75.1%	$595K	$405K to $890K	16.4%	$595K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Xaivian Lee	68.8%	$445K	$285K to $660K	12.7%	$445K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Rueben Chinyelu	62.2%	$495K	$325K to $735K	13.5%	$495K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Urban Klavzar	50.9%	$295K	$175K to $445K	8.6%	$295K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Micah Handlogten	36.4%	$175K	$85K to $285K	5.2%	$175K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Brown	29.5%	$140K	$63K to $230K	4.1%	$140K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
CJ Ingram II	7.1%	$38K	$20K to $64K	1.1%	$38K in all four	$25K	Limited evidence
Alex Lloyd	5.5%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Alex Kovatchev	3.2%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Viktor Mikic	3.0%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Olivier Rioux	0.9%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Cooper Josefsberg	0.2%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.60M to $4.95M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Florida (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$17,258,007
Men's basketball expenses	$13,427,727
Athletics department expenses	$199,237,539
Athletics department revenue	$199,237,539

Coverage and exclusions

32 of 35 games passed lineup acceptance (91%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

3 of 35 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue	$17,258,007	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$13,427,727	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	2
2 days	1
3 or more days	31

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	0
Longest run of consecutive away games	2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology