Thomas Haugh
Florida · 2025–26 · 34 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1131:03 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 34
- Minutes per game
- 33:16
- Points per game
- 17.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.1 / 2.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.1 | 6.1 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.5 | 7.4 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 580 | 209 | 73 | 36 | 33 | 51 | 79 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 184–400 | 46.0% | 11.8 | 14.1 |
| 2P | 126–222 | 56.8% | 6.5 | 7.9 |
| 3P | 58–178 | 32.6% | 5.2 | 6.3 |
| FT | 154–199 | 77.4% | 5.9 | 7.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.3% | 59.5% | 44.5% | 49.8% | 1.43 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $670K
- 80% range $450K to $1.00M
- Median share of team pool
- 18.4%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $670K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 81.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida | $670Kspeculative | $450K to $1.00M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +6.2 | +4.8 to +7.4 | Sufficient evidence | +3.9 | +2.2 | +8.2range +7.3 to +9.0 | 3,733 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Florida | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +6.0 | +4.8 to +7.2 | Sufficient evidence | +4.6 | +1.4 | +5.2range +4.5 to +5.9 | 3,075 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Florida | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.7 | +0.4 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +0.5 | +2.1range +1.7 to +2.5 | 1,723 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 33:51 | 33:16 | 22:21–39:32 | |
| Points | 17.0 | 17.1 | 5.0–27.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 45.1% | 51.8% | 22.2%–75.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | Iowa | L 72–73 | 39:19 | 19 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-11 | 2-8 | 11-12 | 36.4% |
| 2026-03-20 | Prairie View | W 114–55 | 22:21 | 14 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-14 | Vanderbilt | L 74–91 | 34:38 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-14 | 1-4 | 8-10 | 39.3% |
| 2026-03-13 | Kentucky | W 71–63 | 35:11 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-5 | 9-10 | 22.2% |
| 2026-03-07 | Kentucky | W 84–77 | 37:46 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-14 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 60.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | Arkansas | W 111–77 | 29:40 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7-12 | 1-3 | 7-7 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-25 | Texas | W 84–71 | 24:13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2-6 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Ole Miss | W 94–75 | 31:34 | 20 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 2-6 | 6-6 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-17 | South Carolina | W 76–62 | 31:36 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Kentucky | W 92–83 | 34:18 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 6-10 | 45.8% |
| 2026-02-11 | Georgia | W 86–66 | 34:58 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-6 | 6-6 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Texas A&M | W 86–67 | 33:07 | 22 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5-12 | 2-4 | 10-13 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Alabama | W 100–77 | 34:45 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9-16 | 2-6 | 2-3 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | South Carolina | W 95–48 | 25:53 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 70.8% |
| 2026-01-24 | Auburn | L 67–76 | 38:10 | 27 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9-19 | 3-9 | 6-9 | 55.3% |
| 2026-01-20 | LSU | W 79–61 | 35:20 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-11 | 1-6 | 2-4 | 22.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | Vanderbilt | W 98–94 | 34:58 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-11 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-13 | Oklahoma | W 96–79 | 34:09 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-13 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 73.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Tennessee | W 91–67 | 36:27 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 8-8 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-06 | Georgia | W 92–77 | 36:16 | 21 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8-15 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Missouri | L 74–76 | 38:28 | 24 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9-20 | 2-6 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Dartmouth | W 94–72 | 27:11 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 35.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Colgate | W 90–60 | 26:41 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 2-5 | 5-8 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-17 | Saint Francis | W 102–61 | 24:49 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | George Washington | W 80–70 | 32:59 | 19 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8-15 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-09 | UConn | L 73–77 | 37:09 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7-12 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 70.8% |
| 2025-12-02 | Duke | L 66–67 | 39:32 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9-15 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-28 | Providence | W 90–78 | 34:29 | 16 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3-9 | 1-5 | 9-11 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-27 | TCU | L 80–84 | 35:53 | 20 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 7-16 | 3-8 | 3-4 | 53.1% |
| 2025-11-21 | Merrimack | W 80–45 | 30:00 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-4 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Miami (FL) | W 82–68 | 36:22 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5-12 | 3-6 | 4-7 | 54.2% |
| 2025-11-11 | Florida St. | W 78–76 | 38:02 | 20 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7-15 | 2-6 | 4-7 | 53.3% |
| 2025-11-06 | North Florida | W 104–64 | 26:35 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-03 | Arizona | L 87–93 | 38:14 | 27 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7-13 | 1-4 | 12-14 | 57.7% |