Dartmouth

Ivy · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 281 · Raw net -7.6 · Tempo 69.2 · 25 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

Record: 9–16; 9 wins
AdjNet: -6.2β; rank 257 of 365
AdjO: 105.4β; rank 240 of 365
AdjD: 111.6β; rank 263 of 365
AdjT: 69.9β
SOS: 0.2β; rank 152 of 363
NCSOS: -0.4β
WAB: -10.1β; rank 228 of 363
RR: -0.0β
Exp. W: 9.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	105.0248	112.7282	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	51.8156	52.7254	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.6248	13.8340	16.7
Offensive rebound %	23.7346	29.7148	30.6
FTA / FGA %	38.0102	30.782	35.0
Shooting
3P%	36.152	34.6226	33.9
2P%	49.4271	53.2245	51.7
FT%	74.2121	71.2114	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	48.7	39.2	39.5
Assists / FGM %	53.9	50.8	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.3	10.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	40.1	32.0	31.4
2-pointers %	38.5	50.8	48.8
Free throws %	21.4	17.2	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 43%
Bench Share of Minutes: 31%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-09	Marist	L 56–75	72.8	Home	0–1
11-12	Bryant	L 75–82	74.5	Away	0–2
11-16	App State	L 77–85	72.1	Home	0–3
11-29	Saint Peter's	W 87–61	65.7	Away	1–3
12-03	New Hampshire	W 69–68	69.4	Home	2–3
12-06	Wyoming	L 80–93	72.7	Away	2–4
12-09	Colorado St.	L 55–76	63.1	Away	2–5
12-13	Boston U.	W 77–64	67.2	Home	3–5
12-16	Holy Cross	W 89–64	67.2	Away	4–5
12-19	Sacred Heart	L 63–85	74.1	Away	4–6
12-29	Florida	L 72–94	74.3	Away	4–7
01-05	Harvard	W 76–68	64.0	Away	5–7
01-10	Cornell	W 102–91	75.2	Away	6–7
01-17	Penn	L 74–84	72.5	Home	6–8
01-19	Princeton	W 71–69	61.2	Home	7–8
01-24	Columbia	L 69–79	71.4	Home	7–9
01-30	Yale	L 68–83	64.3	Away	7–10
01-31	Brown	W 77–70 1OT	74.7	Away	8–10
02-07	Harvard	L 58–71	64.4	Home	8–11
02-13	Yale	L 70–83	68.3	Home	8–12
02-14	Brown	L 76–79	71.5	Home	8–13
02-21	Columbia	W 64–63	67.2	Away	9–13
02-27	Penn	L 71–80	69.2	Away	9–14
02-28	Princeton	L 61–82	64.6	Away	9–15
03-07	Cornell	L 90–111	77.9	Home	9–16

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 25 of 25 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Connor Amundsen	24	30:03	71.8%	9.4	2.0	3.8	0.5	0.0	1.1	2.1	36–81	44.4%	34–107	31.8%	52–70	74.3%	46.3%	51.6%	37.2%	5	30:45 +0:42	76.9%	6.6 −2.8
Brandon Mitchell-Day	25	28:31	70.9%	12.3	9.0	2.2	0.6	0.8	2.6	2.4	88–166	53.0%	22–64	34.4%	66–88	75.0%	52.6%	57.3%	38.3%	5	27:08 −1:23	67.8%	15.8 +3.5
Kareem Thomas	24	29:12	69.7%	15.9	2.8	1.5	0.5	0.2	2.4	2.8	66–152	43.4%	41–92	44.6%	127–161	78.9%	52.3%	60.7%	66.0%	5	26:42 −2:31	66.7%	12.4 −3.5
Jayden Williams	25	27:39	68.8%	11.8	4.0	1.0	0.8	0.4	1.9	2.4	37–67	55.2%	61–174	35.1%	39–46	84.8%	53.3%	56.7%	19.1%	5	25:39 −2:00	64.1%	12.2 +0.4
Jackson Munro	25	25:28	63.3%	7.8	4.2	1.9	0.2	0.9	0.9	1.6	39–65	60.0%	31–79	39.2%	25–31	80.6%	59.4%	62.2%	21.5%	5	25:04 −0:24	62.7%	6.4 −1.4
Cameron McNamee	25	20:25	50.8%	5.7	3.4	0.5	0.8	0.2	0.8	1.6	13–32	40.6%	29–70	41.4%	30–47	63.8%	55.4%	58.3%	46.1%	5	23:30 +3:05	58.7%	10.0 +4.3
Niko Abusara	21	16:58	35.5%	5.0	2.3	1.1	0.9	0.5	0.8	1.5	34–73	46.6%†	3–13	23.1%†	29–41	70.7%	44.8%†	50.9%†	47.7%†	5	18:09 +1:11	45.4%	6.2 +1.2
Cameron Hiatt	21	16:48	35.1%	3.4	1.6	0.9	0.6	0.2	0.8	1.4	8–22	36.4%†	15–48	31.3%†	11–13	84.6%†	43.6%†	47.5%†	18.6%†	5	13:24 −3:23	33.5%	1.0 −2.4
Ben Brown	15	8:57	13.3%	1.5	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.9	2–5	40.0%†	6–23	26.1%†	0–0	—	39.3%†	39.3%†	0.0%†	5	5:02 −3:54	12.6%	0.4 −1.1
Anton StrelnikovUnder 100 minutes	16	5:08	8.2%	3.3	0.9	0.2	0.2	0.3	0.4	0.9	22–35	62.9%†	1–1	100.0%†	5–11	45.5%†	65.3%†	63.7%†	30.6%†	4	4:21 −0:47	8.7%	1.3 −2.0
Patrick Tivnan Jr.Under 100 minutes	11	5:50	6.4%	0.8	1.0	0.2	0.1	0.0	0.2	0.6	4–7	57.1%†	0–1	0.0%†	1–7	14.3%†	50.0%†	40.6%†	87.5%†	1	0:44 −5:06	0.4%	0.0 −0.8
Shanon SimangoFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	2:37	2.1%	1.1	1.0	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.3	0.0	2–4	50.0%†	0–0	—	5–10	50.0%†	50.0%†	53.6%†	250.0%†	1	0:44 −1:53	0.4%	1.0 −0.1
Tyler GarrettFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	2:36	1.8%	0.9	0.9	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.1	0.0	1–3	33.3%†	1–3	33.3%†	1–2	50.0%†	41.7%†	43.6%†	33.3%†	1	0:44 −1:52	0.4%	1.0 +0.1
Khai LockwoodFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	0:48	0.5%	0.0	0.0	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	1	0:44 −0:04	0.4%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per game	25 games			73.1	33.4	12.8	not published	3.5	12.3	not published	352–712	49.4%	244–675	36.1%	391–527	74.2%	51.8%	56.4%	38.0%
Sum of players				73.1	30.3	12.8	5.0	3.5	11.6	16.8	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.1	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.7	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Dartmouth College (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,329,112	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$1,329,112
Athletics department expenses	$41,963,544
Athletics department revenue	$41,963,544

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 25 games, 1,740 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	73.1	78.4
Field goals made	23.8	28.3
Field goals attempted	55.5	61.6
3-pointers made	9.8	8.4
3-pointers attempted	27.0	24.2
Free throws made	15.6	13.5
Free throws attempted	21.1	18.9
Offensive rebounds	8.1	10.7
Defensive rebounds	25.3	26.0
Total rebounds	33.4	36.7
Assists	12.8	14.4
Blocks	3.5	3.0
Turnovers	12.3	9.6
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 124.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 419.
Minutes (derived)	201.0	not published

25 of 25 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	1,827	1,827	0	±9.1	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	596	596	0	±3.0	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,387	1,387	0	±6.9	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	244	244	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	675	675	0	±3.4	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	391	391	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	527	527	0	±2.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	835	757	+78	±66.8	0
Assists	Reconciled	321	321	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	87	87	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	307	290	+17	±9.2	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	124	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	419	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,025	5,007	+18.3	±100.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Connor Amundsen	72.0%	-1.0range -1.9 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Brandon Mitchell-Day	71.7%	+1.7range +0.5 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Kareem Thomas	69.6%	+0.1range -1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Jayden Williams	68.8%	-1.3range -2.2 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Jackson Munro	63.8%	+0.1range -1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Cameron McNamee	52.0%	-0.2range -1.4 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Cameron Hiatt	36.4%	-0.3range -1.7 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Niko Abusara	35.2%	-0.3range -1.4 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Ben Brown	12.1%	-1.9range -2.7 to -1.1Limited evidence
Anton Strelnikov	8.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Patrick Tivnan Jr.	5.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Shanon Simango	2.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Tyler Garrett	1.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Khai Lockwood	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.0range +8.1 to +9.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 96.3% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 3.7%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value