Gonzaga

WCC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 2 · Raw net 25.7 · Tempo 70.2 · 35 Division I games · Through 2026-03-21

Record: 31–4; 31 wins
AdjNet: 25.5β; rank 8 of 365
AdjO: 119.1β; rank 28 of 365
AdjD: 93.6β; rank 5 of 365
AdjT: 69.6β
SOS: 3.5β; rank 92 of 363
NCSOS: 3.9β
WAB: 6.6β; rank 17 of 363
RR: 0.4β
Exp. W: 30.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	119.716	94.01	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	55.625	46.315	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	13.616	20.024	16.7
Offensive rebound %	34.851	25.716	30.6
FTA / FGA %	31.0282	30.984	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.3212	30.622	33.9
2P%	58.218	46.620	51.7
FT%	70.7247	71.5123	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	30.8	42.8	39.5
Assists / FGM %	57.5	52.8	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	11.1	6.0	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	23.1	34.2	31.4
2-pointers %	60.5	46.5	48.8
Free throws %	16.4	19.3	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 10.1
Top Three Share of Minutes: 37%
Bench Share of Minutes: 42%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Texas Southern	W 98–43	72.5	Home	1–0
11-08	Oklahoma	W 83–68	73.9	Home	2–0
11-11	Creighton	W 90–63	71.9	Home	3–0
11-14	Arizona St.	W 77–65	69.8	Away	4–0
11-17	Southern Utah	W 122–50	81.8	Home	5–0
11-24	Alabama	W 95–85	76.6	Neutral	6–0
11-25	Maryland	W 100–61	70.0	Neutral	7–0
11-26	Michigan	L 61–101	80.5	Neutral	7–1
12-05	Kentucky	W 94–59	70.5	Neutral	8–1
12-07	North Florida	W 109–58	77.4	Home	9–1
12-13	UCLA	W 82–72	65.6	Neutral	10–1
12-17	Campbell	W 98–70	82.4	Home	11–1
12-21	Oregon	W 91–82	67.7	Neutral	12–1
12-28	Pepperdine	W 96–56	70.8	Away	13–1
12-30	San Diego	W 99–93	79.7	Away	14–1
01-02	Seattle U	W 80–72 1OT	75.8	Home	15–1
01-04	LMU (CA)	W 82–47	69.0	Home	16–1
01-08	Santa Clara	W 89–77	73.3	Home	17–1
01-15	Washington St.	W 86–65	67.8	Away	18–1
01-17	Seattle U	W 71–50	69.2	Away	19–1
01-21	Pepperdine	W 84–60	69.5	Home	20–1
01-24	San Francisco	W 68–66	67.8	Home	21–1
01-31	Saint Mary's (CA)	W 73–65	67.9	Home	22–1
02-04	Portland	L 80–87	73.9	Away	22–2
02-07	Oregon St.	W 81–61	55.6	Away	23–2
02-10	Washington St.	W 83–53	70.9	Home	24–2
02-14	Santa Clara	W 94–86	76.4	Away	25–2
02-18	San Francisco	W 80–59	67.1	Away	26–2
02-21	Pacific	W 71–62	61.2	Home	27–2
02-25	Portland	W 89–48	67.5	Home	28–2
02-28	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 59–70	64.0	Away	28–3
03-09	Oregon St.	W 65–56	63.1	Neutral	29–3
03-10	Santa Clara	W 79–68	60.4	Neutral	30–3
03-19	Kennesaw St.	W 73–64	69.1	—	31–3
03-21	Texas	L 68–74	64.0	—	31–4

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 35 of 35 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Graham Ike	31	30:35	67.5%	616	249	73	23	26	56	87	213–350	60.9%	24–71	33.8%	118–148	79.7%	59.1%	63.4%	35.2%	5	37:08 +6:33	92.9%	20.0 +0.1
Emmanuel Innocenti	35	24:22	60.7%	209	133	61	36	9	17	59	60–96	62.5%	23–81	28.4%	20–33	60.6%	53.4%	54.6%	18.6%	5	34:55 +10:33	87.3%	5.8 −0.2
Mario Saint-Supery	35	23:00	57.3%	301	98	133	46	4	52	64	46–110	41.8%	48–119	40.3%	65–74	87.8%	51.5%	57.5%	32.3%	5	27:32 +4:32	68.8%	8.2 −0.4
Tyon Grant-Foster	35	21:19	53.1%	387	174	41	28	38	48	64	124–232	53.4%	17–65	26.2%	88–144	61.1%	50.3%	53.7%	48.5%	5	22:42 +1:24	56.8%	10.8 −0.3
Jalen Warley	33	21:54	51.5%	233	160	70	49	9	31	85	94–166	56.6%	0–0	—	45–69	65.2%	56.6%	59.3%	41.6%	4	24:05 +2:11	48.2%	7.0 −0.1
Adam Miller	35	19:37	48.9%	254	55	36	24	1	17	35	55–92	59.8%	39–129	30.2%	27–36	75.0%	51.4%	53.6%	16.3%	5	19:35 −0:02	49.0%	5.4 −1.9
Braeden Smith	35	17:08	42.7%	178	77	127	34	0	38	33	47–86	54.7%	17–51	33.3%	33–41	80.5%	52.9%	57.4%	29.9%	5	12:05 −5:03	30.2%	2.2 −2.9
Davis Fogle	30	15:56	34.0%	259	94	40	21	14	20	30	85–151	56.3%	14–40	35.0%†	47–65	72.3%	55.5%	59.0%	34.0%	5	23:51 +7:55	59.6%	10.8 +2.2
Braden Huff	18	25:38	32.8%	320	101	27	8	9	17	45	138–198	69.7%	7–21	33.3%†	23–40	57.5%	67.8%	67.6%	18.3%	—	—	—	—
Steele Venters	27	15:01	28.9%	134	35	28	17	2	17	34	8–16	50.0%	36–98	36.7%	10–12	83.3%†	54.4%	56.2%	10.5%	—	—	—	—
Ismaila Diagne	28	7:34	15.1%	30	67	4	4	16	10	33	12–24	50.0%†	0–0	—	6–15	40.0%†	50.0%†	49.0%†	62.5%†	4	2:16 −5:17	4.5%	0.0 −1.1
Noah HaalandUnder 100 minutes	10	4:14	3.0%	20	11	1	1	0	3	9	9–10	90.0%†	0–4	0.0%†	2–2	100.0%†	64.3%†	67.2%†	14.3%†	—	—	—	—
Joaquim ArauzMooreFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	2:01	1.1%	6	3	1	1	0	0	3	0–0	—	2–3	66.7%†	0–2	0.0%†	100.0%†	77.3%†	66.7%†	—	—	—	—
Cade OrnessFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	1:55	1.1%	3	1	1	1	0	3	2	1–2	50.0%†	0–0	—	1–5	20.0%†	50.0%†	35.7%†	250.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	35 games			2950	1396	643	not published	129	336	not published	892–1533	58.2%	227–682	33.3%	485–686	70.7%	55.6%	58.6%	31.0%
Sum of players				2950	1258	643	293	128	329	583	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+138	0	not published	+1	+7	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.15M; 80% Range $1.75M to $5.55M
Tier: Big East and Gonzaga; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.05M to $3.25M; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Graham Ike	66.2%	$470K	$250K to $880K	14.6%	$455K to $490K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Emmanuel Innocenti	61.5%	$450K	$235K to $830K	13.7%	$435K to $465K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Mario Saint-Supery	58.0%	$350K	$175K to $660K	11.4%	$340K to $365K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Tyon Grant-Foster	53.2%	$230K	$92K to $465K	8.0%	$220K to $240K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Jalen Warley	51.7%	$320K	$160K to $610K	10.2%	$310K to $335K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Adam Miller	49.8%	$245K	$110K to $480K	8.4%	$240K to $255K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Braeden Smith	42.4%	$260K	$125K to $480K	8.3%	$250K to $265K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Davis Fogle	33.8%	$215K	$105K to $395K	6.9%	$205K to $220K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Braden Huff	33.3%	$250K	$130K to $465K	7.6%	$240K to $255K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Steele Venters	28.9%	$145K	$70K to $280K	5.0%	$140K to $150K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Ismaila Diagne	16.0%	$78K	$36K to $155K	2.7%	$75K to $81K	$21K	Sufficient evidence
Noah Haaland	3.1%	$21K	$11K to $43K	0.7%	$21K to $22K	$21K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Joaquim ArauzMoore	1.1%	$21K	$11K to $43K	0.7%	$21K to $22K	$21K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Cade Orness	1.1%	$21K	$11K to $43K	0.7%	$21K to $22K	$21K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.15M	$1.75M to $5.55M	100%	$3.05M to $3.25M	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Gonzaga University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$19,510,548
Men's basketball expenses	$13,588,661
Athletics department expenses	$40,467,847
Athletics department revenue	$48,229,118

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 35 games, 2,465 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,950	2,316
Field goals made	1,119	803
Field goals attempted	2,215	2,021
3-pointers made	227	264
3-pointers attempted	682	864
Free throws made	485	446
Free throws attempted	686	624
Offensive rebounds	420	338
Defensive rebounds	976	787
Total rebounds	1,396	1,125
Assists	643	424
Blocks	129	92
Turnovers	336	493
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 293.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 583.
Minutes (derived)	7,025	not published

35 of 35 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,950	2,950	0	±14.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,119	1,119	0	±5.6	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,215	2,215	0	±11.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	227	227	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	682	682	0	±3.4	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	485	485	0	±2.4	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	686	686	0	±3.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,396	1,258	+138	±111.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	643	643	0	±3.2	0
Blocks	Reconciled	129	128	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	336	329	+7	±10.1	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	293	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	583	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,025	6,991	+34.1	±140.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Graham Ike	66.2%	+5.3range +3.8 to +6.4Sufficient evidence
Emmanuel Innocenti	61.5%	+5.3range +3.8 to +7.0Sufficient evidence
Mario Saint-Supery	58.0%	+4.5range +2.8 to +5.9Sufficient evidence
Tyon Grant-Foster	53.2%	+2.8range +1.3 to +4.2Sufficient evidence
Jalen Warley	51.7%	+4.4range +2.8 to +6.0Sufficient evidence
Adam Miller	49.8%	+3.4range +1.9 to +4.9Sufficient evidence
Braeden Smith	42.4%	+4.2range +3.0 to +5.4Sufficient evidence
Davis Fogle	33.8%	+4.3range +3.2 to +5.4Sufficient evidence
Braden Huff	33.3%	+5.2range +4.0 to +6.4Sufficient evidence
Steele Venters	28.9%	+3.3range +1.9 to +4.5Sufficient evidence
Ismaila Diagne	16.0%	+2.5range +1.4 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Noah Haaland	3.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Joaquim ArauzMoore	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Cade Orness	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +13.6range +12.6 to +14.4Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.0% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value