Mario Saint-Supery
Gonzaga · 2025–26 · 35 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
804:52 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 35
- Minutes per game
- 23:00
- Points per game
- 8.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 3.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.6 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.0 | 4.9 | 6.6 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 301 | 98 | 133 | 46 | 4 | 52 | 64 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 94–229 | 41.0% | 6.5 | 11.4 |
| 2P | 46–110 | 41.8% | 3.1 | 5.5 |
| 3P | 48–119 | 40.3% | 3.4 | 5.9 |
| FT | 65–74 | 87.8% | 2.1 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.5% | 57.5% | 52.0% | 32.3% | 2.56 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Gonzaga · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $350K
- 80% range $175K to $660K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.4%
- team pool $3.15M, 80% range $1.75M to $5.55M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $340K to $365K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $21K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 58.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Gonzaga: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Gonzaga | $350Kspeculative | $175K to $660K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.5 | +2.8 to +5.9 | Sufficient evidence | +3.2 | +1.3 | +3.6range +3.1 to +4.1 | 2,698 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:32 | 23:00 | 13:24–35:37 | |
| Points | 8.2 | 8.6 | 0.0–21.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 32.3% | 49.1% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Texas | L 68–74 | 30:56 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 43.8% |
| 2026-03-19 | Kennesaw St. | W 73–64 | 35:37 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2-11 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 22.7% |
| 2026-03-10 | Santa Clara | W 79–68 | 30:27 | 21 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6-12 | 6-12 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-09 | Oregon St. | W 65–56 | 19:36 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-4 | 2-3 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 59–70 | 21:03 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Portland | W 89–48 | 26:55 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 85.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Pacific | W 71–62 | 24:52 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2026-02-18 | San Francisco | W 80–59 | 33:04 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 4-4 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Santa Clara | W 94–86 | 32:35 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-10 | Washington St. | W 83–53 | 18:00 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 110.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Oregon St. | W 81–61 | 25:38 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 27.8% |
| 2026-02-04 | Portland | L 80–87 | 22:32 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-10 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Saint Mary's (CA) | W 73–65 | 23:51 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | San Francisco | W 68–66 | 19:24 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-21 | Pepperdine | W 84–60 | 19:42 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-17 | Seattle U | W 71–50 | 23:24 | 20 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-10 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 90.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Washington St. | W 86–65 | 15:05 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | Santa Clara | W 89–77 | 20:41 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | LMU (CA) | W 82–47 | 25:06 | 13 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-7 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 78.6% |
| 2026-01-02 | Seattle U | W 80–72 | 14:26 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | San Diego | W 99–93 | 21:07 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-9 | 3-6 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Pepperdine | W 96–56 | 17:23 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1-7 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 21.4% |
| 2025-12-21 | Oregon | W 91–82 | 13:31 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Campbell | W 98–70 | 22:27 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | UCLA | W 82–72 | 27:07 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | North Florida | W 109–58 | 19:42 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 1-1 | 150.0% |
| 2025-12-05 | Kentucky | W 94–59 | 20:50 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Michigan | L 61–101 | 24:27 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 27.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | Maryland | W 100–61 | 22:01 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-24 | Alabama | W 95–85 | 32:15 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 10-11 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Southern Utah | W 122–50 | 25:09 | 16 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-7 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 92.9% |
| 2025-11-14 | Arizona St. | W 77–65 | 13:24 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Creighton | W 90–63 | 18:10 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-6 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Oklahoma | W 83–68 | 25:17 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Texas Southern | W 98–43 | 19:08 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 31.3% |