Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Washington St.

WCC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 217 · Raw net -2.3 · Tempo 68.9 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-06

All seasons
Record
11–20
11 wins
AdjNet
0.6β
rank 163 of 365
AdjO
111.5β
rank 104 of 365
AdjD
110.9β
rank 242 of 365
AdjT
68.8β
SOS
3.1β
rank 94 of 363
NCSOS
2.6β
WAB
-11.2β
rank 242 of 363
RR
-2.8β
Exp. W
13.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.109.7137112.1272108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%54.74852.624851.4
TO / 100 poss.18.429114.631616.7
Offensive rebound %29.522128.27130.6
FTA / FGA %30.230533.013335.0
Shooting
3P%36.54035.427233.9
2P%54.67152.421751.7
FT%74.510375.332872.5
Style
3PA / FGA %44.836.739.5
Assists / FGM %51.649.252.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %7.79.69.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %37.229.931.4
2-pointers %45.750.948.8
Free throws %17.119.119.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
9.1
Top Three Share of Minutes
41%
Bench Share of Minutes
36%
Players with Logged Minutes
12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03IdahoL 81–8371.6Home0–1
11-07DavidsonL 69–8569.9Away0–2
11-10St. Thomas (MN)W 81–7168.6Home1–2
11-14WashingtonL 69–8162.3Home1–3
11-19Southern UtahW 98–7472.1Home2–3
11-25Arizona St.L 94–10071.3Neutral2–4
11-26Seton HallL 61–7566.4Neutral2–5
12-02BradleyL 60–6468.6Away2–6
12-07NevadaL 64–7863.2Home2–7
12-14Southern CaliforniaL 61–6870.4Away2–8
12-17Eastern Wash.W 78–6370.9Neutral3–8
12-20MercerW 84–7875.1Home4–8
12-28PortlandW 67–6268.3Away5–8
12-30Seattle UL 55–6968.4Away5–9
01-02LMU (CA)W 78–7669.8Home6–9
01-04Oregon St.W 81–6765.2Home7–9
01-10Saint Mary's (CA)L 82–8870.8Away7–10
01-15GonzagaL 65–8667.8Home7–11
01-18San FranciscoL 80–8564.5Away7–12
01-21San DiegoL 92–9670.0Away7–13
01-24PepperdineW 95–7971.1Home8–13
01-28Seattle UW 70–5868.1Home9–13
01-31PortlandW 104–7471.6Home10–13
02-04Oregon St.L 64–7467.6Away10–14
02-07Santa ClaraL 92–9670.9Home10–15
02-10GonzagaL 53–8370.9Away10–16
02-18PacificW 87–7065.5Home11–16
02-21Saint Mary's (CA)L 67–8362.9Home11–17
02-25LMU (CA)L 66–6768.0Away11–18
02-28PepperdineL 79–8875.5Away11–19
03-06PortlandL 68–7469.6Neutral11–20

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groupsMinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Ace Glass lll3128:4271.7%16.13.02.40.80.12.41.9106–19654.1%68–18936.0%83–9587.4%54.0%58.5%24.7%532:16 +3:3480.7%16.6 +0.5
Eemeli Yalaho3128:2771.1%10.15.61.70.50.31.71.757–10454.8%51–12740.2%47–6078.3%57.8%61.0%26.0%529:53 +1:2674.7%9.8 −0.3
Jerone Morton3124:4661.9%7.81.82.60.80.21.22.150–10647.2%31–7939.2%50–6182.0%52.2%57.4%33.0%527:30 +2:4368.7%9.0 +1.2
ND Okafor3123:2358.5%11.25.60.90.51.52.03.2144–24858.1%0–0—58–8865.9%58.1%60.3%35.5%525:00 +1:3862.5%12.2 +1.0
Rihards Vavers2825:1256.9%11.03.90.50.60.30.91.237–5863.8%66–16540.0%36–4187.8%61.0%63.9%18.4%531:01 +5:4977.5%12.6 +1.6
Adria Rodriguez3119:5149.6%3.43.33.31.00.21.61.839–8545.9%1–156.7%†23–5541.8%40.5%41.9%55.0%520:06 +0:1550.3%3.2 −0.2
Simon Hildebrandt3114:3536.5%4.61.80.50.40.10.72.116–2759.3%30–8037.5%22–3073.3%57.0%59.9%28.0%510:26 −4:0926.1%4.0 −0.6
Tomas Thrastarson1823:2033.9%9.14.21.20.40.41.62.137–6854.4%15–5030.0%45–5877.6%50.4%57.1%49.2%518:06 −5:1445.3%6.0 −3.1
Emmanuel Ugbo2218:0031.9%6.73.50.80.20.11.02.040–7354.8%12–4228.6%†32–4571.1%50.4%54.9%39.1%————
Parker Gerrits309:2622.8%1.91.20.80.50.00.41.16–1250.0%†15–4037.5%†0–0—54.8%†54.8%†0.0%†46:45 −2:4113.5%0.0 −1.9
Kase WynottFew gamesUnder 100 minutes410:103.3%3.50.50.00.50.00.30.84–580.0%†2–825.0%†0–0—53.8%†53.8%†0.0%†————
Dio BlakelyFew gamesUnder 100 minutes51:030.4%0.80.20.00.20.20.20.20–0—0–20.0%†4–4100.0%†0.0%†53.2%†200.0%†————
Team, games with logs · per game31 games75.633.913.8not published2.912.7not published536–98254.6%291–79736.5%400–53774.5%54.7%58.2%30.2%
Sum of players75.631.013.85.52.912.417.7Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.00.0not published0.0+0.4not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$930K
80% Range $400K to $2.05M
Tier
Mid and high major
low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$720K to $1.05M
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
12
2 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Ace Glass lll73.1%$205K$69K to $600K20.0%$155K to $225K$7KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eemeli Yalaho71.4%$68K$7K to $215K9.9%$52K to $75K$7KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jerone Morton62.1%$43K$5K to $165K6.7%$33K to $48K$7KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
ND Okafor59.2%$115K$26K to $345K13.0%$90K to $130K$7KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rihards Vavers57.1%$86K$14K to $245K10.7%$66K to $95K$7KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Adria Rodriguez49.9%$76K$13K to $210K9.4%$58K to $84K$7KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Simon Hildebrandt37.6%$76K$16K to $235K8.3%$58K to $84K$7KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tomas Thrastarson32.6%$45K$9K to $125K5.9%$34K to $50K$7KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Emmanuel Ugbo30.0%$19K$4K to $73K2.6%$15K to $21K$7KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Parker Gerrits22.7%$50K$16K to $145K5.4%$39K to $56K$7KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kase Wynott3.6%$7K$3K to $18K0.8%$6K to $8K$7KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Dio Blakely0.5%$7K$3K to $18K0.8%$6K to $8K$7KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$930K$400K to $2.05M100%$720K to $1.05M—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Washington State University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$6,640,383
Men's basketball expenses$4,336,028
Athletics department expenses$68,573,910
Athletics department revenue$82,229,485

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 31 games, 2,137 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points75.677.3
Field goals made26.727.4
Field goals attempted57.459.4
3-pointers made9.47.7
3-pointers attempted25.721.8
Free throws made12.914.8
Free throws attempted17.319.6
Offensive rebounds9.69.5
Defensive rebounds24.323.0
Total rebounds33.932.5
Assists13.813.5
Blocks2.93.0
Turnovers12.710.0
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 170.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 550.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,3452,3450±11.70
Field goals madeReconciled8278270±4.10
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,7791,7790±8.90
3-pointers madeReconciled2912910±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled7977970±4.00
Free throws madeReconciled4004000±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled5375370±2.70
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown1,052960+92±84.20
AssistsReconciled4274270±2.10
BlocksReconciled90900±2.00
TurnoversReconciled394383+11±11.80
StealsNo team figurenot published170not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published550not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,2006,182+17.6±124.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Ace Glass lll73.1%+1.6range +0.2 to +3.0Sufficient evidence
Eemeli Yalaho71.4%-0.7range -1.8 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Jerone Morton62.1%-1.2range -2.4 to -0.0Sufficient evidence
ND Okafor59.2%+0.8range -0.9 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Rihards Vavers57.1%+0.2range -1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Adria Rodriguez49.9%+0.1range -1.2 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Simon Hildebrandt37.6%+0.5range -0.8 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Tomas Thrastarson32.6%-0.2range -1.3 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Emmanuel Ugbo30.0%-1.8range -3.1 to -0.8Sufficient evidence
Parker Gerrits22.7%+0.8range -0.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Kase Wynott3.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Dio Blakely0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+9.5range +8.6 to +10.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 99.2% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value