Campbell

CAA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 237 · Raw net -3.9 · Tempo 70.0 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-09

Record: 14–18; 14 wins
AdjNet: -1.9β; rank 202 of 365
AdjO: 109.6β; rank 141 of 365
AdjD: 111.5β; rank 262 of 365
AdjT: 70.4β
SOS: 1.7β; rank 115 of 363
NCSOS: 6.2β
WAB: -9.7β; rank 216 of 363
RR: 0.5β
Exp. W: 13.5β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	108.6167	112.6280	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	50.1230	53.9295	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.6241	17.0156	16.7
Offensive rebound %	33.577	32.0254	30.6
FTA / FGA %	43.516	37.0238	35.0
Shooting
3P%	32.3267	35.5277	33.9
2P%	51.2206	54.2281	51.7
FT%	72.5191	74.2275	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	36.9	29.9	39.5
Assists / FGM %	45.0	49.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	3.7	10.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	27.1	23.6	31.4
2-pointers %	49.0	56.1	48.8
Free throws %	23.9	20.3	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 7.1
Top Three Share of Minutes: 51%
Bench Share of Minutes: 21%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Wisconsin	L 64–96	71.1	Away	0–1
11-06	West Virginia	L 65–73	68.0	Away	0–2
11-09	Western Mich.	W 91–82	80.4	Home	1–2
11-19	Weber St.	L 85–91	73.8	Away	1–3
11-21	UT Arlington	W 71–67	73.3	Neutral	2–3
11-25	Wake Forest	L 51–99	71.9	Away	2–4
12-02	Penn St.	L 76–87	73.0	Away	2–5
12-14	Ball St.	W 69–64	69.6	Home	3–5
12-17	Gonzaga	L 70–98	82.4	Away	3–6
12-21	Minnesota	L 50–78	60.6	Away	3–7
12-23	Green Bay	W 102–79	66.4	Home	4–7
12-29	Hofstra	L 72–86	66.2	Away	4–8
12-31	Monmouth	W 68–65	64.8	Away	5–8
01-03	Northeastern	W 97–82	72.2	Home	6–8
01-08	Hampton	W 86–72	74.2	Home	7–8
01-10	Elon	L 82–83	67.4	Away	7–9
01-17	UNCW	L 75–78	67.6	Away	7–10
01-22	Col. of Charleston	L 83–87	72.7	Away	7–11
01-24	Monmouth	L 73–88	72.1	Home	7–12
01-29	Stony Brook	L 69–81	66.6	Home	7–13
01-31	William & Mary	W 104–96	78.8	Away	8–13
02-05	Drexel	W 81–60	69.0	Home	9–13
02-07	N.C. A&T	W 79–71	70.2	Away	10–13
02-15	Col. of Charleston	L 57–62	60.8	Home	10–14
02-19	William & Mary	W 84–83	74.3	Home	11–14
02-21	UNCW	L 68–73	68.3	Home	11–15
02-26	Drexel	L 60–65	63.7	Away	11–16
02-28	Towson	L 67–71	59.2	Away	11–17
03-03	N.C. A&T	W 90–72	70.7	Home	12–17
03-07	Stony Brook	W 96–89	72.3	Neutral	13–17
03-08	UNCW	W 85–70	71.6	Neutral	14–17
03-09	Monmouth	L 64–74	67.2	Neutral	14–18

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
D.J. Smith	32	35:07	87.8%	18.8	3.5	2.0	1.5	0.1	1.9	2.2	84–184	45.7%	90–270	33.3%	163–198	82.3%	48.2%	55.5%	43.6%	5	33:59 −1:07	85.0%	16.6 −2.2
Cam Gregory	32	33:50	84.6%	7.9	3.0	2.1	0.7	0.3	1.2	3.6	49–86	57.0%	39–121	32.2%	39–51	76.5%	51.9%	55.4%	24.6%	5	31:16 −2:34	78.2%	8.0 +0.1
Jeremiah Johnson	32	33:02	82.6%	15.0	3.5	2.0	0.7	0.2	2.2	2.5	101–211	47.9%	44–121	36.4%	146–168	86.9%	50.3%	59.1%	50.6%	5	33:01 −0:02	82.5%	14.2 −0.8
Dovydas Butka	29	34:05	77.2%	13.7	8.2	2.6	1.2	0.1	2.4	2.4	148–278	53.2%	5–30	16.7%†	85–153	55.6%	50.5%	52.8%	49.7%	5	35:08 +1:03	87.8%	14.4 +0.7
Tasos Cook	32	24:45	61.9%	7.2	1.9	1.1	0.8	0.1	0.8	2.0	36–81	44.4%	39–106	36.8%	42–53	79.2%	50.5%	54.9%	28.3%	5	25:05 +0:20	62.7%	9.0 +1.8
Muneer Newton	32	19:23	48.5%	6.1	4.8	0.8	0.4	0.5	1.1	2.6	83–121	68.6%	0–1	0.0%†	28–59	47.5%	68.0%	65.6%	48.4%	5	18:35 −0:48	46.5%	6.2 +0.1
Chris Fields Jr.	25	18:18	35.7%	9.1	6.2	1.2	1.1	0.2	2.0	2.7	79–170	46.5%	1–11	9.1%†	66–100	66.0%	44.5%	50.4%	55.2%	5	19:48 +1:30	49.5%	11.2 +2.1
Dominykas Butka	21	5:33	9.1%	1.0	0.7	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.4	0.3	5–11	45.5%†	1–7	14.3%†	9–14	64.3%†	36.1%†	45.5%†	77.8%†	2	2:57 −2:36	3.0%	1.0 0.0
Enoch KalambayFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	7:32	5.3%	1.9	2.1	0.4	0.2	0.1	0.8	1.0	7–11	63.6%†	1–12	8.3%†	0–0	—	37.0%†	37.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Terren FrankFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	7:07	3.9%	1.4	0.7	0.4	0.3	0.1	0.4	1.4	4–11	36.4%†	0–1	0.0%†	2–3	66.7%†	33.3%†	37.5%†	25.0%†	2	1:35 −5:33	1.6%	1.0 −0.4
Broc BidwellUnder 100 minutes	10	2:40	2.1%	0.2	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.1	0.2	0.3	0–1	0.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	2–4	50.0%†	0.0%†	21.0%†	133.3%†	2	2:02 −0:38	2.0%	0.0 −0.2
Daniel MarcellinusFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	4:17	0.3%	0.0	1.0	0.0	1.0	0.0	1.0	3.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	32 games			76.1	34.1	11.5	not published	1.5	12.3	not published	596–1165	51.2%	220–682	32.3%	582–803	72.5%	50.1%	55.3%	43.5%
Sum of players				76.1	30.3	11.4	6.5	1.5	11.5	18.1	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.8	+0.0	not published	0.0	+0.8	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $245K; 80% Range $92K to $670K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $220K to $255K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 12; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
D.J. Smith	90.9%	$67K	$24K to $200K	25.3%	$60K to $70K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cam Gregory	86.6%	$21K	$3K to $72K	11.7%	$19K to $22K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jeremiah Johnson	84.4%	$38K	$11K to $115K	16.5%	$34K to $40K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dovydas Butka	74.7%	$38K	$12K to $115K	16.0%	$34K to $40K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tasos Cook	60.5%	$7K	$1K to $38K	4.5%	$7K to $8K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Muneer Newton	50.6%	$14K	$2K to $49K	7.7%	$13K to $15K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chris Fields Jr.	33.8%	$27K	$9K to $86K	10.0%	$24K to $28K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dominykas Butka	9.8%	$4K	$1K to $11K	1.7%	$3K to $4K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Terren Frank	4.9%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Enoch Kalambay	1.8%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Broc Bidwell	1.6%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Daniel Marcellinus	0.4%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$245K	$92K to $670K	100%	$220K to $255K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Campbell University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,126,965
Men's basketball expenses	$2,126,966
Athletics department expenses	$28,322,787
Athletics department revenue	$28,322,787

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 32 games, 2,241 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	76.1	78.8
Field goals made	25.5	28.3
Field goals attempted	57.7	58.3
3-pointers made	6.9	6.2
3-pointers attempted	21.3	17.4
Free throws made	18.2	16.0
Free throws attempted	25.1	21.6
Offensive rebounds	11.8	10.5
Defensive rebounds	22.3	23.5
Total rebounds	34.1	34.0
Assists	11.5	14.1
Blocks	1.5	3.8
Turnovers	12.3	11.9
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 208.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 578.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,434	2,434	0	±12.2	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	816	816	0	±4.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,847	1,847	0	±9.2	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	220	220	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	682	682	0	±3.4	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	582	582	0	±2.9	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	803	803	0	±4.0	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,091	971	+120	±87.3	0
Assists	Reconciled	367	366	+1	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	48	48	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	394	369	+25	±11.8	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	208	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	578	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,400	6,388	+12.4	±128.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
D.J. Smith	90.9%	+2.0range +1.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Cam Gregory	86.6%	-0.3range -1.1 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Jeremiah Johnson	84.4%	+0.8range -0.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Dovydas Butka	74.7%	+1.2range +0.2 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Tasos Cook	60.5%	-1.6range -2.7 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Muneer Newton	50.6%	-0.1range -1.1 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Chris Fields Jr.	33.8%	+2.2range +1.0 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Dominykas Butka	9.8%	-0.9range -1.4 to -0.2Limited evidence
Terren Frank	4.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Enoch Kalambay	1.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Broc Bidwell	1.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Daniel Marcellinus	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.9range +9.1 to +10.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

8 valued players hold 98.3% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.7%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value