San Diego

WCC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 297 · Raw net -8.7 · Tempo 68.8 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-06

Record: 10–21; 10 wins
AdjNet: -6.7β; rank 262 of 365
AdjO: 106.1β; rank 223 of 365
AdjD: 112.8β; rank 285 of 365
AdjT: 68.9β
SOS: 0.7β; rank 136 of 363
NCSOS: -3.2β
WAB: -13.4β; rank 288 of 363
RR: -0.6β
Exp. W: 10.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	104.5259	113.2296	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	51.2186	54.7318	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.5237	18.955	16.7
Offensive rebound %	28.1261	34.5328	30.6
FTA / FGA %	25.8358	38.8283	35.0
Shooting
3P%	34.6141	32.7101	33.9
2P%	50.8221	58.5356	51.7
FT%	74.795	73.5252	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	43.7	40.1	39.5
Assists / FGM %	59.1	57.3	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	7.5	10.1	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	37.2	28.5	31.4
2-pointers %	47.0	50.8	48.8
Free throws %	15.8	20.7	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 10.6
Top Three Share of Minutes: 38%
Bench Share of Minutes: 42%
Players with Logged Minutes: 18

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-07	Idaho St.	L 68–71	63.3	Home	0–1
11-12	Idaho	W 78–74	67.0	Home	1–1
11-18	Grambling	W 78–68	74.0	Home	2–1
11-21	UC Riverside	L 71–85	68.0	Home	2–2
11-25	California Baptist	L 61–76	70.7	Neutral	2–3
11-30	Long Beach St.	L 72–76	63.0	Away	2–4
12-05	San Jose St.	L 69–86	73.0	Away	2–5
12-09	Southern California	L 81–94	78.5	Home	2–6
12-13	Northern Ariz.	W 78–69	66.5	Home	3–6
12-19	UC San Diego	W 82–80	67.4	Away	4–6
12-22	Washington	L 56–86	74.0	Away	4–7
12-28	Pacific	W 66–54	64.0	Home	5–7
12-30	Gonzaga	L 93–99	79.7	Home	5–8
01-02	San Francisco	L 64–74	71.4	Away	5–9
01-04	Santa Clara	L 70–98	74.5	Away	5–10
01-08	Pepperdine	W 83–63	67.2	Home	6–10
01-10	Pacific	L 70–77	69.9	Away	6–11
01-15	Seattle U	L 64–75	72.3	Away	6–12
01-21	Washington St.	W 96–92	70.0	Home	7–12
01-24	Santa Clara	L 73–85	74.6	Home	7–13
01-28	Pepperdine	W 92–88 1OT	80.3	Away	8–13
01-31	Oregon St.	L 76–78 1OT	81.8	Home	8–14
02-04	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 60–87	63.8	Away	8–15
02-07	LMU (CA)	L 63–83	63.1	Away	8–16
02-11	Portland	W 71–58	63.7	Home	9–16
02-15	San Francisco	L 79–92	69.1	Home	9–17
02-21	LMU (CA)	L 65–77	62.1	Home	9–18
02-25	Oregon St.	L 82–92 1OT	74.3	Away	9–19
02-28	Portland	L 74–87	69.2	Away	9–20
03-05	LMU (CA)	W 66–62	61.3	Neutral	10–20
03-06	Seattle U	L 56–58	61.1	Neutral	10–21

Roster · 18 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Toneari Lane	31	27:04	66.9%	11.0	2.0	0.7	0.6	0.1	0.6	1.2	42–94	44.7%	75–177	42.4%	32–38	84.2%	57.0%	59.3%	14.0%	5	32:51 +5:47	80.1%	14.0 +3.0
Adrian McIntyre	31	25:00	61.8%	10.0	3.6	2.9	1.2	0.0	1.6	1.3	94–153	61.4%	24–77	31.2%	49–67	73.1%	56.5%	59.5%	29.1%	5	32:48 +7:48	80.0%	10.4 +0.4
Juanse Gorosito	31	24:35	60.7%	10.6	2.8	2.2	1.0	0.1	1.3	1.5	45–106	42.5%	66–173	38.2%	40–48	83.3%	51.6%	54.6%	17.2%	5	23:58 −0:37	58.4%	12.0 +1.4
Vuk Boskovic	31	20:41	51.1%	6.1	3.2	2.1	0.4	0.3	1.7	2.9	26–45	57.8%	38–107	35.5%	23–39	59.0%	54.6%	55.9%	25.7%	5	20:27 −0:14	49.9%	8.2 +2.1
Ty-Laur Johnson	22	28:55	50.7%	15.0	2.8	4.2	2.2	0.3	3.0	3.0	95–196	48.5%	23–78	29.5%	71–86	82.6%	47.3%	52.9%	31.4%	—	—	—	—
Dominique Ford	29	17:12	39.7%	5.6	2.1	0.7	0.9	0.0	0.7	1.2	45–93	48.4%	10–45	22.2%†	41–54	75.9%	43.5%	49.8%	39.1%	4	20:38 +3:26	40.3%	5.5 −0.1
Assane Diop	27	18:21	39.5%	5.5	4.7	0.9	0.2	0.4	1.1	2.5	41–78	52.6%	17–42	40.5%†	16–27	59.3%	55.4%	56.5%	22.5%	5	24:32 +6:12	59.9%	7.2 +1.7
Gavin Ripp	25	17:00	33.9%	3.9	2.4	1.4	0.5	0.1	1.0	2.2	34–69	49.3%†	4–16	25.0%†	18–23	78.3%†	47.1%†	51.5%†	27.1%†	5	31:51 +14:51	77.7%	7.8 +3.9
Tim Moore	29	14:27	33.4%	5.5	2.3	0.3	0.4	0.7	0.5	1.5	46–81	56.8%	11–55	20.0%	34–45	75.6%	46.0%	51.0%	33.1%	5	10:29 −3:59	25.6%	4.2 −1.3
Alejandro Aviles	23	10:33	19.3%	2.4	1.6	0.8	0.4	0.3	0.5	1.3	21–51	41.2%†	0–2	0.0%†	13–17	76.5%†	39.6%†	45.5%†	32.1%†	3	3:37 −6:56	5.3%	0.0 −2.4
Darrae Goodwin	13	14:06	14.6%	4.3	2.3	0.6	0.2	0.4	0.8	1.7	10–16	62.5%†	10–32	31.3%†	6–9	66.7%†	52.1%†	53.9%†	18.8%†	—	—	—	—
Emmanuel Callas	18	6:56	9.9%	0.7	1.1	0.2	0.5	0.1	0.1	1.2	5–12	41.7%†	0–0	—	2–4	50.0%†	41.7%†	43.6%†	33.3%†	3	10:00 +3:04	14.6%	0.0 −0.7
Brandon Benjamin	18	6:28	9.3%	2.4	0.8	0.8	0.4	0.1	0.6	0.3	17–30	56.7%†	1–3	33.3%†	7–10	70.0%†	56.1%†	58.8%†	30.3%†	3	4:25 −2:03	6.5%	0.7 −1.8
Piotr WinkowskiUnder 100 minutes	14	4:54	5.5%	1.5	1.1	0.2	0.3	0.7	0.5	0.7	8–16	50.0%†	0–0	—	5–11	45.5%†	50.0%†	50.4%†	68.8%†	—	—	—	—
Neel BeniwalFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	1:38	0.9%	0.4	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.1	0.3	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Josh HechtFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	1:12	0.7%	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.1	1–2	50.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	33.3%†	33.3%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Nick Del BosqueFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	0:46	0.3%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0.2	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Caleb VersherFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	1:48	0.3%	0.0	0.5	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.5	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	31 games			72.8	30.7	15.5	not published	2.6	12.2	not published	530–1044	50.8%	280–810	34.6%	357–478	74.7%	51.2%	54.7%	25.8%
Sum of players				72.8	27.7	15.5	7.7	2.6	11.7	18.5	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.1	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.5	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $735K; 80% Range $330K to $1.65M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $705K to $775K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 18; 6 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Toneari Lane	65.8%	$14K	$2K to $99K	2.0%	$13K to $15K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Adrian McIntyre	61.2%	$180K	$67K to $530K	21.9%	$175K to $190K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Juanse Gorosito	61.0%	$98K	$22K to $280K	13.7%	$95K to $105K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ty-Laur Johnson	56.7%	$54K	$4K to $155K	9.3%	$52K to $57K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Vuk Boskovic	55.4%	$41K	$3K to $135K	7.9%	$39K to $43K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dominique Ford	38.2%	$33K	$4K to $100K	5.9%	$32K to $34K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Assane Diop	37.7%	$31K	$3K to $99K	5.7%	$29K to $32K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tim Moore	34.4%	$30K	$4K to $90K	5.4%	$28K to $31K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Gavin Ripp	29.8%	$42K	$9K to $125K	6.2%	$41K to $44K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alejandro Aviles	21.2%	$41K	$13K to $115K	5.3%	$39K to $43K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Darrae Goodwin	14.6%	$27K	$9K to $72K	3.6%	$26K to $28K	$4K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Brandon Benjamin	8.5%	$22K	$8K to $60K	2.7%	$21K to $23K	$4K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Emmanuel Callas	6.7%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.5%	$4K in all four	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Piotr Winkowski	6.3%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.5%	$4K in all four	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Neel Beniwal	1.1%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.5%	$4K in all four	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Josh Hecht	0.8%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.5%	$4K in all four	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Nick Del Bosque	0.4%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.5%	$4K in all four	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Caleb Versher	0.3%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.5%	$4K in all four	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$735K	$330K to $1.65M	100%	$705K to $775K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of San Diego (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$5,328,384	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$5,328,384
Athletics department expenses	$37,050,500
Athletics department revenue	$37,050,500

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 31 games, 2,159 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	72.8	78.8
Field goals made	26.1	27.5
Field goals attempted	59.8	57.2
3-pointers made	9.0	7.5
3-pointers attempted	26.1	22.9
Free throws made	11.5	16.3
Free throws attempted	15.4	22.2
Offensive rebounds	9.9	11.0
Defensive rebounds	20.8	25.3
Total rebounds	30.7	36.3
Assists	15.5	15.8
Blocks	2.6	3.4
Turnovers	12.2	13.2
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 238.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 575.
Minutes (derived)	202.4	not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,257	2,257	0	±11.3	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	810	810	0	±4.0	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,854	1,854	0	±9.3	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	280	280	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	810	810	0	±4.0	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	357	357	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	478	478	0	±2.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	953	858	+95	±76.2	0
Assists	Reconciled	479	479	0	±2.4	0
Blocks	Reconciled	80	80	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	378	362	+16	±11.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	238	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	575	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,275	6,255	+20.0	±125.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Toneari Lane	65.8%	-2.8range -4.4 to -1.4Sufficient evidence
Adrian McIntyre	61.2%	+1.8range +0.7 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Juanse Gorosito	61.0%	+0.4range -1.0 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Ty-Laur Johnson	56.7%	-0.6range -1.7 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Vuk Boskovic	55.4%	-0.9range -1.9 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
Dominique Ford	38.2%	-0.8range -1.9 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Assane Diop	37.7%	-0.9range -2.1 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Tim Moore	34.4%	-0.7range -1.8 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Gavin Ripp	29.8%	+0.0range -0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Alejandro Aviles	21.2%	+0.7range -0.4 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Darrae Goodwin	14.6%	+0.4range -0.2 to +1.2Limited evidence
Brandon Benjamin	8.5%	+1.0range +0.2 to +1.7Limited evidence
Emmanuel Callas	6.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Piotr Winkowski	6.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Neel Beniwal	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Josh Hecht	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Nick Del Bosque	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Caleb Versher	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +8.8range +7.9 to +9.7Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 96.9% of on-court time. 6 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 3.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 4.6%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value