Braden Huff
Gonzaga · 2025–26 · 18 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
461:16 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 18
- Minutes per game
- 25:38
- Points per game
- 17.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.6 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.8 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 27.7 | 8.8 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 3.9 |
| Season totals | 320 | 101 | 27 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 45 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 145–219 | 66.2% | 12.2 | 19.0 |
| 2P | 138–198 | 69.7% | 11.0 | 17.2 |
| 3P | 7–21 | 33.3%† | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| FT | 23–40 | 57.5% | 2.2 | 3.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67.8% | 67.6% | 9.6% | 18.3% | 1.59 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Gonzaga · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $250K
- 80% range $130K to $465K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.6%
- team pool $3.15M, 80% range $1.75M to $5.55M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $240K to $255K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $21K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 33.3%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Gonzaga: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Gonzaga | $250Kspeculative | $130K to $465K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +5.2 | +4.0 to +6.4 | Sufficient evidence | +2.7 | +2.5 | +2.0range +1.8 to +2.2 | 1,551 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Gonzaga | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.9 | +2.5 to +5.2 | Sufficient evidence | +2.7 | +1.2 | +2.2range +1.8 to +2.5 | 1,597 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Gonzaga | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.9 | +0.4 to +3.3 | Sufficient evidence | +2.0 | -0.0 | +1.5range +1.2 to +1.8 | 1,180 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:00 | 25:38 | 20:16–40:18 | |
| Points | 14.4 | 17.8 | 8.0–37.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 65.5% | 69.3% | 35.3%–95.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-08 | Santa Clara | W 89–77 | 26:18 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-04 | LMU (CA) | W 82–47 | 20:26 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Seattle U | W 80–72 | 40:18 | 28 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11-14 | 2-2 | 4-6 | 85.7% |
| 2025-12-30 | San Diego | W 99–93 | 20:43 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 63.6% |
| 2025-12-28 | Pepperdine | W 96–56 | 27:17 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2025-12-21 | Oregon | W 91–82 | 26:22 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9-16 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 59.4% |
| 2025-12-17 | Campbell | W 98–70 | 33:00 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16-18 | 1-1 | 4-7 | 91.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | UCLA | W 82–72 | 24:32 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-12 | 1-2 | 6-8 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-07 | North Florida | W 109–58 | 26:26 | 24 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 70.6% |
| 2025-12-05 | Kentucky | W 94–59 | 30:39 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-11 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 81.8% |
| 2025-11-26 | Michigan | L 61–101 | 25:02 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7-17 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 41.2% |
| 2025-11-25 | Maryland | W 100–61 | 24:22 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9-10 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 95.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Alabama | W 95–85 | 26:54 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9-12 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Southern Utah | W 122–50 | 22:45 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 84.6% |
| 2025-11-14 | Arizona St. | W 77–65 | 20:17 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4-5 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 90.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Creighton | W 90–63 | 21:03 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7-12 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Oklahoma | W 83–68 | 24:36 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-17 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 35.3% |
| 2025-11-03 | Texas Southern | W 98–43 | 20:16 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 75.0% |