Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Maryland

B10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 311 · Raw net -10.3 · Tempo 66.7 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-03-11

All seasons
Record
12–21
12 wins
AdjNet
-1.0β
rank 189 of 365
AdjO
107.9β
rank 183 of 365
AdjD
108.9β
rank 195 of 365
AdjT
67.4β
SOS
9.5β
rank 21 of 363
NCSOS
0.1β
WAB
-6.3β
rank 137 of 363
RR
2.3β
Exp. W
9.7β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.104.1268114.4314108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%48.131154.431151.4
TO / 100 poss.18.630314.929516.7
Offensive rebound %33.87329.111030.6
FTA / FGA %36.414235.820535.0
Shooting
3P%31.729336.331633.9
2P%48.629454.428851.7
FT%72.220372.820672.5
Style
3PA / FGA %46.943.139.5
Assists / FGM %45.261.252.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %9.111.79.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %36.434.831.4
2-pointers %42.245.948.8
Free throws %21.419.319.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
9.2
Top Three Share of Minutes
42%
Bench Share of Minutes
33%
Players with Logged Minutes
12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03Coppin St.W 83–6168.2Neutral1–0
11-07GeorgetownL 60–7069.2Home1–1
11-11AlcornW 84–6472.0Home2–1
11-15MarquetteW 89–8277.1Away3–1
11-19Mount St. Mary'sW 95–90 1OT78.5Home4–1
11-25GonzagaL 61–10070.0Neutral4–2
11-25UNLVW 74–6773.2—5–2
11-27AlabamaL 72–10576.4—5–3
12-02WagnerW 89–6374.0Home6–3
12-06IowaL 64–8370.4Away6–4
12-13MichiganL 83–10169.8Home6–5
12-20VirginiaL 72–8067.2Away6–6
12-28Old DominionW 73–5868.1Home7–6
01-02OregonL 54–6464.8Home7–7
01-07IndianaL 66–8468.7Home7–8
01-10UCLAL 55–6765.5Away7–9
01-13Southern CaliforniaL 71–8867.7Away7–10
01-18Penn St.W 96–7365.5Home8–10
01-21IllinoisL 70–8967.9Away8–11
01-24Michigan St.L 48–9162.6Away8–12
02-01PurdueL 63–9364.4Home8–13
02-05Ohio St.L 62–8262.2Home8–14
02-08MinnesotaW 67–6254.9Away9–14
02-11IowaW 77–7062.2Home10–14
02-15RutgersL 57–6864.8Away10–15
02-18NorthwesternL 74–7865.9Away10–16
02-21WashingtonW 64–6056.8Home11–16
02-25NebraskaL 61–7463.6Away11–17
03-01RutgersL 65–6970.3Home11–18
03-04WisconsinL 45–7857.8Away11–19
03-08IllinoisL 72–7861.2Home11–20
03-10OregonW 70–6062.8Neutral12–20
03-11IowaL 64–7565.7Neutral12–21

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 32 of 33 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groupsMinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Elijah Saunders3230:4774.3%9.24.31.00.40.31.12.544–8949.4%58–14141.1%31–3881.6%57.0%59.4%16.5%535:04 +4:1887.7%9.4 +0.2
Andre Mills3226:4764.7%12.44.21.70.50.31.72.780–17146.8%54–15634.6%76–9778.4%49.2%53.8%29.7%528:55 +2:0872.3%16.0 +3.6
David Coit3226:3164.0%13.61.92.80.60.01.81.377–13955.4%69–21032.9%75–8885.2%51.7%56.2%25.2%522:11 −4:2055.4%10.2 −3.4
Darius Adams3225:3461.7%11.03.31.70.50.22.02.077–17743.5%33–13125.2%99–13871.7%41.1%47.7%44.8%521:44 −3:5054.3%9.0 −2.0
Solomon Washington2531:4760.0%9.89.21.01.10.81.83.075–15448.7%9–3724.3%†69–10963.3%46.3%51.5%57.1%531:19 −0:2878.3%7.6 −2.2
Isaiah Watts3116:5939.7%4.51.80.70.80.30.81.717–3647.2%29–9530.5%18–2864.3%46.2%48.5%21.4%513:07 −3:5132.8%4.8 +0.3
Collin Metcalf3113:3731.8%1.33.20.30.10.70.51.718–3256.3%†0–10.0%†5–1338.5%†54.5%†52.9%†39.4%†525:47 +12:1064.5%3.2 +1.9
George Turkson Jr.2211:2619.0%1.42.10.20.00.20.31.99–1947.4%†0–50.0%†12–2450.0%†37.5%†43.4%†100.0%†57:09 −4:1817.9%1.0 −0.4
Myles Rice1615:2918.7%4.81.81.30.90.01.21.316–4337.2%†10–3033.3%†15–1788.2%†42.5%†47.8%†23.3%†————
Pharrel PayneFew games925:4017.4%17.66.81.30.41.02.82.151–7865.4%†0–0—56–8169.1%65.4%†69.5%†103.8%†————
Aleks Alston258:3216.1%1.41.70.30.20.20.40.77–1258.3%†5–2420.8%†5–955.6%†40.3%†42.5%†25.0%†25:14 −3:185.2%0.0 −1.4
Guillermo Del Pino239:1216.0%1.60.70.50.40.10.60.75–1729.4%†8–2927.6%†2–450.0%†37.0%†37.7%†8.7%†511:42 +2:3029.3%2.0 +0.4
Team, games with logs · per game32 games70.035.310.7not published2.912.4not published476–96749.2%275–85932.0%463–64671.7%48.7%53.1%35.4%
Sum of players70.031.810.74.82.911.617.8Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.40.0not published0.0+0.8not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$3.60M
80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier
Power 4
medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$3.60M in all four
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
12
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Elijah Saunders79.6%$445K$33K to $800K13.6%$445K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Solomon Washington70.2%$700K$350K to $1.80M18.1%$700K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
David Coit67.4%$370K$32K to $665K11.4%$370K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Andre Mills66.6%$455K$50K to $940K13.1%$455K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Darius Adams63.6%$215K$23K to $465K6.5%$215K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Watts40.4%$280K$42K to $540K8.0%$280K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Collin Metcalf36.5%$330K$155K to $770K8.7%$330K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
George Turkson Jr.20.8%$64K$21K to $160K1.9%$64K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Myles Rice17.5%$60K$21K to $140K1.8%$60K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Guillermo Del Pino14.4%$96K$28K to $165K2.9%$96K in all four$29KLimited evidence
Aleks Alston13.6%$62K$21K to $125K1.9%$62K in all four$29KLimited evidence
Pharrel Payne9.4%$125K$79K to $280K3.3%$125K in all four$29KLimited evidence
Team Pool—$3.60M$2.60M to $4.95M100%$3.60M in all four—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Maryland-College Park (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$16,464,647
Men's basketball expenses$12,972,857
Athletics department expenses$128,662,116
Athletics department revenue$128,662,116

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 33 games, 2,209 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points69.776.6
Field goals made23.226.5
Field goals attempted56.956.8
3-pointers made8.58.9
3-pointers attempted26.724.5
Free throws made14.914.8
Free throws attempted20.720.3
Offensive rebounds12.29.5
Defensive rebounds23.223.8
Total rebounds35.433.4
Assists10.516.2
Blocks2.93.5
Turnovers12.410.0
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 155.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 571.
Minutes (derived)200.8not published

32 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,2402,2400±11.260
Field goals madeReconciled7517510±3.813
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,8261,8260±9.152
3-pointers madeReconciled2752750±2.04
3-pointers attemptedReconciled8598590±4.321
Free throws madeReconciled4634630±2.330
Free throws attemptedReconciled6466460±3.237
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown1,1281,019+109±90.240
AssistsReconciled3413410±2.04
BlocksReconciled94940±2.03
TurnoversResidual shown397372+25±11.913
StealsNo team figurenot published155not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published571not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,4256,407+18.0±128.5200

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Elijah Saunders79.6%-0.5range -1.9 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Solomon Washington70.2%+1.0range -0.4 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
David Coit67.4%-0.6range -1.6 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Andre Mills66.6%+0.1range -1.3 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Darius Adams63.6%-1.5range -2.6 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Watts40.4%-0.1range -1.3 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Collin Metcalf36.5%+0.5range -0.6 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
George Turkson Jr.20.8%-1.9range -3.1 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Myles Rice17.5%-2.2range -3.1 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
Guillermo Del Pino14.4%-0.6range -1.5 to +0.4Limited evidence
Aleks Alston13.6%-1.6range -2.8 to -0.6Limited evidence
Pharrel Payne9.4%+1.1range +0.7 to +1.5Limited evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+9.1range +8.2 to +10.0Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 100.0% of on-court time. 0 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 7.5%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value