Kennesaw St.

CUSA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 136 · Raw net 2.5 · Tempo 71.8 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-19

Record: 18–14; 18 wins
AdjNet: 1.4β; rank 153 of 365
AdjO: 110.0β; rank 137 of 365
AdjD: 108.6β; rank 189 of 365
AdjT: 71.5β
SOS: -0.8β; rank 188 of 363
NCSOS: -4.2β
WAB: -7.1β; rank 152 of 363
RR: 0.2β
Exp. W: 17.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	110.6124	108.1169	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	50.4224	48.343	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.7179	16.0221	16.7
Offensive rebound %	35.243	31.6234	30.6
FTA / FGA %	45.16	47.1358	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.4202	33.5156	33.9
2P%	50.5232	47.129	51.7
FT%	70.1268	75.1313	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	42.5	37.9	39.5
Assists / FGM %	50.9	50.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	14.6	13.1	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	32.2	28.9	31.4
2-pointers %	43.9	44.3	48.8
Free throws %	23.9	26.8	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.6
Top Three Share of Minutes: 40%
Bench Share of Minutes: 37%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-08	Florida A&M	W 92–72	80.5	Away	1–0
11-16	South Fla.	L 89–108	79.7	Home	1–1
11-24	Rice	W 89–84 1OT	80.7	Neutral	2–1
11-25	Oral Roberts	L 83–91	77.5	Neutral	2–2
11-26	FGCU	W 102–100 1OT	86.8	Away	3–2
12-02	Jackson St.	W 88–73	72.7	Home	4–2
12-06	Georgia St.	W 92–69	84.2	Home	5–2
12-17	Middle Tenn.	L 67–68	69.3	Away	5–3
12-21	Alabama	L 81–92	78.7	Neutral	5–4
01-02	Liberty	L 73–81	73.3	Away	5–5
01-04	Delaware	L 52–67	63.9	Away	5–6
01-07	Missouri St.	W 90–80	74.5	Home	6–6
01-10	Jacksonville St.	W 88–82	72.5	Home	7–6
01-14	FIU	W 89–86	73.8	Home	8–6
01-17	Western Ky.	W 81–65	72.3	Away	9–6
01-21	Sam Houston	L 87–93	73.5	Away	9–7
01-23	Louisiana Tech	L 76–82	65.5	Away	9–8
01-28	Western Ky.	W 72–69	71.1	Home	10–8
01-31	New Mexico St.	W 76–53	66.9	Home	11–8
02-07	Jacksonville St.	L 58–77	66.2	Away	11–9
02-12	Middle Tenn.	L 87–90	70.1	Home	11–10
02-14	Sam Houston	L 79–83	66.2	Home	11–11
02-18	Missouri St.	W 91–87	72.3	Away	12–11
02-21	Louisiana Tech	W 58–55	67.8	Home	13–11
02-26	Liberty	W 74–65	63.3	Home	14–11
02-28	Delaware	W 90–82	69.5	Home	15–11
03-05	UTEP	L 71–78	74.9	Away	15–12
03-07	New Mexico St.	L 76–79	67.6	Away	15–13
03-12	Western Ky.	W 96–87	77.0	Neutral	16–13
03-13	Sam Houston	W 79–73	69.7	Neutral	17–13
03-14	Louisiana Tech	W 71–60	64.5	Neutral	18–13
03-19	Gonzaga	L 64–73	69.1	—	18–14

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
RJ Johnson	31	29:11	70.1%	14.8	3.0	3.9	1.2	0.4	2.0	1.9	103–227	45.4%	52–126	41.3%	98–155	63.2%	51.3%	54.6%	43.9%	5	36:51 +7:39	92.1%	15.6 +0.8
Braedan Lue	32	27:03	67.1%	10.9	5.1	1.3	0.9	1.4	1.6	3.3	117–224	52.2%	17–76	22.4%	64–91	70.3%	47.5%	51.3%	30.3%	5	28:46 +1:43	71.9%	9.2 −1.7
Frankquon Sherman	32	25:59	64.5%	10.8	8.6	1.0	1.0	0.8	1.3	3.0	87–152	57.2%	24–84	28.6%	100–135	74.1%	52.1%	58.6%	57.2%	5	28:52 +2:52	72.2%	14.2 +3.4
Trey Simpson	32	25:39	63.6%	8.0	4.7	0.6	0.8	1.3	1.1	1.8	38–64	59.4%	46–146	31.5%	42–62	67.7%	51.0%	53.9%	29.5%	5	25:17 −0:23	63.2%	8.6 +0.6
Kaden Rickard	32	19:18	47.9%	5.5	2.5	1.9	1.0	0.5	1.6	2.6	37–89	41.6%	18–50	36.0%	48–85	56.5%	46.0%	49.9%	61.2%	5	22:44 +3:26	56.8%	7.0 +1.5
Amir Taylor	30	17:41	41.1%	7.6	3.4	0.9	0.4	0.4	0.9	2.3	58–99	58.6%	15–35	42.9%†	67–101	66.3%	60.1%	63.9%	75.4%	5	29:03 +11:22	72.6%	15.6 +8.0
Jaden Harris	19	24:59	36.8%	8.0	1.8	1.0	0.7	0.2	1.0	1.8	7–27	25.9%	38–102	37.3%	24–28	85.7%	49.6%	53.8%	21.7%	5	21:11 −3:47	53.0%	6.6 −1.4
Simeon Cottle	14	32:13	35.0%	20.6	2.6	3.7	1.4	0.3	3.0	3.0	36–80	45.0%	41–119	34.5%	94–105	89.5%	49.0%	58.9%	52.8%	—	—	—	—
Ramone Seals	19	18:09	26.7%	7.5	4.0	0.4	0.5	0.5	1.0	1.5	29–53	54.7%	18–55	32.7%	31–40	77.5%	51.9%	56.9%	37.0%	2	2:15 −15:54	2.3%	1.0 −6.5
Darius Washington III	21	14:33	23.7%	4.5	2.0	1.6	0.3	0.0	0.9	2.0	25–55	45.5%†	6–23	26.1%†	26–39	66.7%	43.6%†	49.4%†	50.0%†	—	—	—	—
Perry Smith Jr.	24	11:23	21.2%	2.6	2.2	0.6	0.2	0.1	0.5	1.5	24–41	58.5%†	0–1	0.0%†	15–27	55.6%	57.1%†	58.5%†	64.3%†	5	6:10 −5:13	15.4%	0.0 −2.6
Eric HollandFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	1:08	0.6%	0.7	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.1	1–1	100.0%†	0–3	0.0%†	3–5	60.0%†	25.0%†	40.3%†	125.0%†	1	0:00 −1:08	0.0%	0.0 −0.7
Charles StoneFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	0:58	0.4%	0.0	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:00 −0:58	0.0%	0.0 0.0
Dozie OnyirimbaFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	1:01	0.3%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:00 −1:01	0.0%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per game	32 games			80.0	38.6	13.3	not published	5.4	12.1	not published	562–1112	50.5%	275–823	33.4%	612–873	70.1%	50.4%	55.2%	45.1%
Sum of players				80.0	34.7	13.3	6.8	5.3	11.8	20.7	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.9	0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.3	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $300K; 80% Range $110K to $815K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $260K to $315K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
RJ Johnson	69.9%	$34K	$9K to $105K	12.8%	$30K to $35K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Braedan Lue	67.3%	$30K	$7K to $96K	11.9%	$26K to $32K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Frankquon Sherman	64.6%	$51K	$16K to $155K	16.1%	$44K to $54K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Trey Simpson	63.5%	$16K	$2K to $63K	7.5%	$14K to $17K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kaden Rickard	48.0%	$8K	$1K to $37K	3.3%	$7K to $8K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Amir Taylor	41.1%	$49K	$15K to $165K	14.9%	$43K to $52K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Simeon Cottle	36.3%	$19K	$6K to $58K	7.1%	$17K to $20K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaden Harris	35.2%	$22K	$7K to $71K	7.7%	$20K to $24K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ramone Seals	27.6%	$23K	$8K to $69K	7.1%	$20K to $24K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Darius Washington III	23.7%	$7K	$1K to $25K	3.0%	$6K to $7K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Perry Smith Jr.	21.4%	$5K	$1K to $20K	2.1%	$4K to $5K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eric Holland	0.6%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Charles Stone	0.4%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Dozie Onyirimba	0.3%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$300K	$110K to $815K	100%	$260K to $315K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Kennesaw State University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,039,976	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,039,976
Athletics department expenses	$42,344,569
Athletics department revenue	$42,344,569

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 32 games, 2,316 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	80.0	78.3
Field goals made	26.2	24.9
Field goals attempted	60.5	59.3
3-pointers made	8.6	7.5
3-pointers attempted	25.7	22.5
Free throws made	19.1	21.0
Free throws attempted	27.3	27.9
Offensive rebounds	13.3	11.7
Defensive rebounds	25.3	24.5
Total rebounds	38.6	36.2
Assists	13.3	12.4
Blocks	5.4	4.6
Turnovers	12.1	11.6
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 217.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 661.
Minutes (derived)	201.6	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,561	2,561	0	±12.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	837	837	0	±4.2	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,935	1,935	0	±9.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	275	275	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	823	823	0	±4.1	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	612	612	0	±3.1	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	873	873	0	±4.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,234	1,110	+124	±98.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	426	426	0	±2.1	0
Blocks	Reconciled	172	171	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	387	378	+9	±11.6	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	217	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	661	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,450	6,438	+12.3	±129.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
RJ Johnson	69.9%	+1.0range -0.2 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Braedan Lue	67.3%	+0.7range -0.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Frankquon Sherman	64.6%	+2.2range +1.1 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Trey Simpson	63.5%	-0.4range -1.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Kaden Rickard	48.0%	-1.4range -2.5 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
Amir Taylor	41.1%	+3.7range +2.4 to +5.2Sufficient evidence
Simeon Cottle	36.3%	+1.0range +0.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Jaden Harris	35.2%	+1.6range +0.2 to +3.0Sufficient evidence
Ramone Seals	27.6%	+2.2range +1.2 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Darius Washington III	23.7%	-0.7range -1.9 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Perry Smith Jr.	21.4%	-1.3range -2.2 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Eric Holland	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Charles Stone	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Dozie Onyirimba	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.3range +9.5 to +11.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.7% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value