Pepperdine

WCC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 333 · Raw net -13.3 · Tempo 69.5 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-05

Record: 7–23; 7 wins
AdjNet: -9.7β; rank 301 of 365
AdjO: 102.9β; rank 292 of 365
AdjD: 112.7β; rank 282 of 365
AdjT: 69.2β
SOS: 2.0β; rank 108 of 363
NCSOS: -2.4β
WAB: -14.9β; rank 314 of 363
RR: -0.9β
Exp. W: 7.9β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	100.5321	113.8305	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	47.6323	54.2306	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	18.3288	16.5182	16.7
Offensive rebound %	29.1234	34.0318	30.6
FTA / FGA %	33.8215	28.535	35.0
Shooting
3P%	31.4309	35.5276	33.9
2P%	48.0309	54.9308	51.7
FT%	75.859	72.3174	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	39.2	40.3	39.5
Assists / FGM %	56.5	55.8	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	7.5	10.7	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	30.6	33.3	31.4
2-pointers %	48.2	50.8	48.8
Free throws %	21.2	15.9	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 48%
Bench Share of Minutes: 28%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-07	UCLA	L 63–74	62.8	Away	0–1
11-15	Northern Colo.	L 81–88 1OT	82.6	Home	0–2
11-18	LSU New Orleans	W 90–79	73.8	Home	1–2
11-21	SFA	L 60–63	67.1	Home	1–3
11-26	Fresno St.	L 53–76	68.8	Neutral	1–4
11-29	Cal St. Fullerton	L 69–83	70.3	Away	1–5
12-02	Abilene Christian	L 63–71	61.9	Home	1–6
12-06	Vermont	L 56–65	62.4	Home	1–7
12-13	CSU Bakersfield	W 70–62	67.5	Away	2–7
12-18	Long Beach St.	L 78–81	69.9	Away	2–8
12-20	Rice	W 84–62	70.5	Home	3–8
12-28	Gonzaga	L 56–96	70.8	Home	3–9
12-30	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 45–72	61.3	Home	3–10
01-02	Santa Clara	L 63–82	74.6	Away	3–11
01-04	Pacific	L 69–74	66.7	Away	3–12
01-08	San Diego	L 63–83	67.2	Away	3–13
01-10	San Francisco	L 60–80	66.3	Home	3–14
01-14	Portland	W 67–63	67.4	Home	4–14
01-21	Gonzaga	L 60–84	69.5	Away	4–15
01-24	Washington St.	L 79–95	71.1	Away	4–16
01-28	San Diego	L 88–92 1OT	80.3	Home	4–17
02-04	Seattle U	L 81–83	76.5	Away	4–18
02-07	Pacific	L 59–92	72.5	Home	4–19
02-11	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 60–88	71.6	Away	4–20
02-14	LMU (CA)	W 90–89	71.2	Home	5–20
02-18	Portland	W 95–87	69.7	Away	6–20
02-21	Oregon St.	L 73–83	72.0	Away	6–21
02-25	Seattle U	L 80–87	70.1	Home	6–22
02-28	Washington St.	W 88–79	75.5	Home	7–22
03-05	Portland	L 68–77	69.3	Neutral	7–23

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Styles Phipps	30	34:21	85.2%	13.7	5.9	5.1	1.5	0.2	2.9	2.7	115–251	45.8%	20–71	28.2%	120–153	78.4%	45.0%	52.7%	47.5%	5	33:14 −1:07	83.1%	15.2 +1.5
Aaron Clark	30	32:36	80.8%	15.3	3.4	2.7	1.1	0.1	2.8	1.7	95–208	45.7%	58–160	36.3%	96–123	78.0%	49.5%	54.5%	33.4%	5	32:55 +0:19	82.3%	18.8 +3.5
Javon Cooley	30	30:13	74.9%	11.5	4.7	1.1	1.0	0.3	1.4	2.0	74–146	50.7%	40–135	29.6%	77–91	84.6%	47.7%	53.7%	32.4%	5	32:41 +2:27	81.7%	11.6 +0.1
Danilo Dozic	25	31:51	65.8%	10.8	2.6	1.4	0.4	0.5	1.4	1.2	48–104	46.2%	43–120	35.8%	45–57	78.9%	50.2%	54.2%	25.4%	—	—	—	—
Yonatan Levy	30	20:53	51.8%	5.0	3.9	1.7	0.8	0.2	1.5	2.6	38–74	51.4%	14–45	31.1%†	31–40	77.5%	49.6%	54.5%	33.6%	5	26:51 +5:57	67.1%	5.0 0.0
Pavle Stosic	30	15:51	39.3%	3.3	3.7	0.7	0.4	0.5	0.6	1.9	34–62	54.8%†	4–23	17.4%†	19–35	54.3%	47.1%†	49.3%†	41.2%†	5	16:25 +0:34	41.0%	3.4 +0.1
Stefan Cicic	30	12:48	31.7%	4.5	2.6	0.3	0.3	0.9	0.9	1.4	51–90	56.7%	3–12	25.0%†	23–41	56.1%	54.4%	55.8%	40.2%	5	30:43 +17:55	76.8%	12.8 +8.3
Luka Vudragovic	29	11:48	28.3%	3.2	1.1	0.3	0.2	0.1	0.4	0.4	22–41	53.7%	13–62	21.0%	11–13	84.6%†	40.3%	43.2%	12.6%	4	4:31 −7:17	9.0%	1.8 −1.5
David Mager	29	10:08	24.3%	3.9	0.8	0.2	0.2	0.1	0.1	1.1	25–65	38.5%	16–43	37.2%†	14–20	70.0%†	45.4%	47.9%	18.5%	5	17:54 +7:47	44.8%	10.8 +6.9
Nikola RadovanovicUnder 100 minutes	16	4:37	6.1%	1.2	0.9	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.3	0.8	5–9	55.6%†	1–4	25.0%†	6–8	75.0%†	50.0%†	57.5%†	61.5%†	5	3:28 −1:09	8.7%	1.4 +0.2
Vladimir SudarUnder 100 minutes	16	3:52	5.1%	0.8	0.3	0.3	0.1	0.0	0.3	0.1	2–7	28.6%†	1–5	20.0%†	6–10	60.0%†	29.2%†	39.6%†	83.3%†	2	3:17 −0:35	3.3%	1.0 +0.2
Pasha ShemiraniUnder 100 minutes	16	3:25	4.5%	0.4	0.4	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.4	0–4	0.0%†	2–5	40.0%†	0–0	—	33.3%†	33.3%†	0.0%†	1	0:37 −2:48	0.3%	0.0 −0.4
Preston PhillipsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	9:38	0.8%	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	30 games			70.4	32.9	13.6	not published	2.8	12.8	not published	509–1061	48.0%	215–685	31.4%	448–591	75.8%	47.6%	52.6%	33.8%
Sum of players				70.4	29.0	13.6	5.9	2.8	12.0	15.5	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.9	+0.1	not published	0.0	+0.8	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $740K; 80% Range $315K to $1.60M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $685K to $830K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Styles Phipps	85.3%	$86K	$6K to $260K	16.1%	$80K to $96K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Aaron Clark	82.7%	$68K	$5K to $230K	13.8%	$64K to $76K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Javon Cooley	74.2%	$25K	$3K to $145K	5.5%	$23K to $28K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Danilo Dozic	63.9%	$32K	$3K to $135K	7.3%	$30K to $36K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Yonatan Levy	53.5%	$66K	$7K to $190K	11.0%	$61K to $73K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Pavle Stosic	40.1%	$215K	$57K to $865K	26.6%	$200K to $235K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Stefan Cicic	32.1%	$20K	$3K to $79K	4.3%	$19K to $22K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Luka Vudragovic	26.8%	$21K	$4K to $76K	4.0%	$19K to $23K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
David Mager	24.8%	$15K	$3K to $59K	2.9%	$14K to $17K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Nikola Radovanovic	6.3%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.8%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Vladimir Sudar	4.9%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.8%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Pasha Shemirani	4.7%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.8%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Preston Phillips	0.8%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.8%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$740K	$315K to $1.60M	100%	$685K to $830K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Pepperdine University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$5,590,356	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$5,590,356
Athletics department expenses	$34,145,327
Athletics department revenue	$34,145,327

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 30 games, 2,101 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	70.4	79.7
Field goals made	24.1	29.1
Field goals attempted	58.2	61.7
3-pointers made	7.2	8.8
3-pointers attempted	22.8	24.9
Free throws made	14.9	12.7
Free throws attempted	19.7	17.6
Offensive rebounds	10.4	11.6
Defensive rebounds	22.5	25.3
Total rebounds	32.9	36.9
Assists	13.6	16.2
Blocks	2.8	3.8
Turnovers	12.8	11.6
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 177.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 464.
Minutes (derived)	201.7	not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,111	2,111	0	±10.6	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	724	724	0	±3.6	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,746	1,746	0	±8.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	215	215	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	685	685	0	±3.4	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	448	448	0	±2.2	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	591	591	0	±3.0	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	987	871	+116	±79.0	0
Assists	Reconciled	409	407	+2	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	83	83	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	385	360	+25	±11.5	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	177	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	464	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,050	6,034	+15.8	±121.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Styles Phipps	85.3%	-0.7range -1.5 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Aaron Clark	82.7%	-1.2range -2.2 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Javon Cooley	74.2%	-2.4range -3.6 to -1.1Sufficient evidence
Danilo Dozic	63.9%	-1.8range -3.0 to -0.7Sufficient evidence
Yonatan Levy	53.5%	-0.5range -1.5 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Pavle Stosic	40.1%	+2.4range +1.4 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Stefan Cicic	32.1%	-1.7range -2.7 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Luka Vudragovic	26.8%	-1.6range -3.1 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
David Mager	24.8%	-2.0range -3.3 to -0.7Sufficient evidence
Nikola Radovanovic	6.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Vladimir Sudar	4.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Pasha Shemirani	4.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Preston Phillips	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +8.1range +7.3 to +9.0Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 96.7% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 3.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value