Ismaila Diagne
Gonzaga · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
211:40 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 7:34
- Points per game
- 1.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 0.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 1.1 | 2.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 5.7 | 12.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 6.2 |
| Season totals | 30 | 67 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 33 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 12–24 | 50.0%† | 0.9 | 4.5 |
| 2P | 12–24 | 50.0%† | 0.9 | 4.5 |
| 3P | 0–0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 6–15 | 40.0%† | 0.5 | 2.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.0%† | 49.0%† | 0.0%† | 62.5%† | 0.40 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Gonzaga · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $78K
- 80% range $36K to $155K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.7%
- team pool $3.15M, 80% range $1.75M to $5.55M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $75K to $81K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $21K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 16.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Gonzaga: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Gonzaga | $78Kspeculative | $36K to $155K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.5 | +1.4 to +3.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | +3.2 | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.8 | 743 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 7:30 | 7:34 | 0:30–28:23 | |
| Points | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.0–6.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 35.0% | 51.9% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Texas | L 68–74 | 0:30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-19 | Kennesaw St. | W 73–64 | 2:24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-09 | Oregon St. | W 65–56 | 3:04 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 59–70 | 3:07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-25 | Portland | W 89–48 | 28:23 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Pacific | W 71–62 | 8:40 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-18 | San Francisco | W 80–59 | 1:02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-14 | Santa Clara | W 94–86 | 2:58 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-10 | Washington St. | W 83–53 | 15:18 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-04 | Portland | L 80–87 | 2:50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-31 | Saint Mary's (CA) | W 73–65 | 2:58 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-24 | San Francisco | W 68–66 | 8:10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Pepperdine | W 84–60 | 20:54 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Seattle U | W 71–50 | 20:19 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Washington St. | W 86–65 | 3:47 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | Santa Clara | W 89–77 | 1:03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-04 | LMU (CA) | W 82–47 | 4:31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-30 | San Diego | W 99–93 | 0:56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-28 | Pepperdine | W 96–56 | 7:48 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Campbell | W 98–70 | 2:44 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-07 | North Florida | W 109–58 | 21:17 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-05 | Kentucky | W 94–59 | 3:31 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-26 | Michigan | L 61–101 | 8:30 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Maryland | W 100–61 | 6:11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Southern Utah | W 122–50 | 15:06 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Creighton | W 90–63 | 3:56 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Oklahoma | W 83–68 | 1:34 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-03 | Texas Southern | W 98–43 | 10:09 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 50.0% |