Davis Fogle
Gonzaga · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
477:53 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 15:56
- Points per game
- 8.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.1 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.6 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.7 | 7.9 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 2.5 |
| Season totals | 259 | 94 | 40 | 21 | 14 | 20 | 30 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 99–191 | 51.8% | 6.4 | 16.0 |
| 2P | 85–151 | 56.3% | 5.0 | 12.6 |
| 3P | 14–40 | 35.0%† | 1.3 | 3.3 |
| FT | 47–65 | 72.3% | 2.2 | 5.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.5% | 59.0% | 20.9% | 34.0% | 2.00 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Gonzaga · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $215K
- 80% range $105K to $395K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.9%
- team pool $3.15M, 80% range $1.75M to $5.55M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $205K to $220K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $21K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 33.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Gonzaga: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Gonzaga | $215Kspeculative | $105K to $395K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.3 | +3.2 to +5.4 | Sufficient evidence | +3.2 | +1.1 | +1.9range +1.7 to +2.1 | 1,572 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 23:51 | 15:56 | 0:00–31:06 | |
| Points | 10.8 | 8.6 | 0.0–19.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 49.5% | 51.6% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Texas | L 68–74 | 23:40 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-19 | Kennesaw St. | W 73–64 | 24:32 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6-13 | 1-4 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-10 | Santa Clara | W 79–68 | 26:16 | 13 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 4-7 | 64.3% |
| 2026-03-09 | Oregon St. | W 65–56 | 18:57 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 59–70 | 25:51 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Portland | W 89–48 | 26:21 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Pacific | W 71–62 | 27:40 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-5 | 1-1 | 9-12 | 90.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | San Francisco | W 80–59 | 23:35 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-14 | Santa Clara | W 94–86 | 13:53 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-10 | Washington St. | W 83–53 | 21:37 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8-11 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 72.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Oregon St. | W 81–61 | 24:25 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Portland | L 80–87 | 23:55 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Saint Mary's (CA) | W 73–65 | 15:34 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | San Francisco | W 68–66 | 31:06 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-15 | 1-6 | 2-4 | 43.3% |
| 2026-01-21 | Pepperdine | W 84–60 | 25:11 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-1 | 8-10 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | Seattle U | W 71–50 | 24:03 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-15 | Washington St. | W 86–65 | 12:13 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-08 | Santa Clara | W 89–77 | 0:00 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-04 | LMU (CA) | W 82–47 | 9:25 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Seattle U | W 80–72 | 5:51 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Pepperdine | W 96–56 | 15:56 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 85.7% |
| 2025-12-17 | Campbell | W 98–70 | 3:48 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | North Florida | W 109–58 | 17:39 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-10 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-05 | Kentucky | W 94–59 | 2:54 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Michigan | L 61–101 | 7:13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Maryland | W 100–61 | 5:43 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-24 | Alabama | W 95–85 | 1:23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-17 | Southern Utah | W 122–50 | 2:40 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-10 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Creighton | W 90–63 | 6:23 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Texas Southern | W 98–43 | 10:09 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 68.8% |