Stanford

ACC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 103 · Raw net 4.4 · Tempo 67.9 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-04-02

Record: 20–13; 20 wins
AdjNet: 8.8β; rank 74 of 365
AdjO: 113.9β; rank 72 of 365
AdjD: 105.0β; rank 92 of 365
AdjT: 68.0β
SOS: 6.1β; rank 70 of 363
NCSOS: -2.1β
WAB: -1.5β; rank 66 of 363
RR: 1.7β
Exp. W: 18.3β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	111.6108	107.1135	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	51.5173	51.0158	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.5104	18.097	16.7
Offensive rebound %	32.5109	29.8149	30.6
FTA / FGA %	35.5166	40.3305	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.2103	32.9118	33.9
2P%	50.5239	51.8181	51.7
FT%	73.2165	76.0344	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	44.0	33.4	39.5
Assists / FGM %	45.9	41.8	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	10.5	9.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	36.0	24.9	31.4
2-pointers %	43.9	52.0	48.8
Free throws %	20.1	23.1	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.3
Top Three Share of Minutes: 42%
Bench Share of Minutes: 37%
Players with Logged Minutes: 15

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-04	Portland St.	W 89–79	80.3	Home	1–0
11-08	Montana	W 91–68	74.6	Home	2–0
11-12	Montana St.	W 77–68	74.6	Home	3–0
11-18	Louisiana	W 93–66	71.3	Home	4–0
11-21	Seattle U	L 69–77	72.6	Home	4–1
11-27	Minnesota	W 72–68	64.0	Neutral	5–1
11-28	Saint Louis	W 78–77	72.3	Neutral	6–1
12-01	Portland	W 94–72	69.5	Home	7–1
12-07	UNLV	L 74–75	72.3	Home	7–2
12-13	San Jose St.	W 86–82	69.1	Away	8–2
12-17	UT Arlington	W 76–60	67.5	Home	9–2
12-20	Colorado	W 77–68	70.3	Neutral	10–2
12-27	CSUN	W 88–80	75.2	Home	11–2
12-30	Notre Dame	L 40–47	58.2	Home	11–3
01-02	Louisville	W 80–76	63.9	Home	12–3
01-07	Virginia Tech	W 69–68	60.1	Away	13–3
01-10	Virginia	L 55–70	63.6	Away	13–4
01-14	North Carolina	W 95–90	73.1	Home	14–4
01-17	Duke	L 50–80	63.0	Home	14–5
01-24	California	L 66–78	71.3	Home	14–6
01-28	Miami (FL)	L 70–79	66.7	Away	14–7
01-31	Florida St.	L 80–88	69.0	Away	14–8
02-04	Clemson	L 64–66	61.9	Home	14–9
02-07	Georgia Tech	W 95–72	72.6	Home	15–9
02-11	Boston College	W 70–64	68.5	Away	16–9
02-14	Wake Forest	L 63–68	62.9	Away	16–10
02-21	California	L 66–72	69.3	Away	16–11
02-25	Pittsburgh	W 75–67	61.4	Home	17–11
02-28	SMU	W 95–75	64.3	Home	18–11
03-04	Notre Dame	W 86–78	63.5	Away	19–11
03-07	NC State	W 85–84	68.7	Away	20–11
03-10	Pittsburgh	L 63–64	58.6	Neutral	20–12
04-02	West Virginia	L 77–82 1OT	73.4	—	20–13

Roster · 15 players

Player logs in 33 of 33 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Ebuka Okorie	31	35:07	82.1%	719	113	111	49	10	58	43	171–325	52.6%	63–178	35.4%	188–226	83.2%	52.8%	59.7%	44.9%	5	37:41 +2:34	91.9%	25.4 +2.2
Benny Gealer	33	29:23	73.2%	361	84	56	52	4	23	77	26–47	55.3%	86–210	41.0%	51–57	89.5%	60.3%	64.0%	22.2%	5	34:59 +5:36	85.3%	12.4 +1.5
Ryan Agarwal	32	22:19	53.9%	190	130	25	19	8	37	49	30–80	37.5%	38–109	34.9%	16–23	69.6%†	46.0%	47.7%	12.2%	5	17:02 −5:16	41.6%	5.8 −0.1
Aidan Cammann	33	21:35	53.7%	213	126	47	33	14	37	92	53–98	54.1%	11–41	26.8%†	74–105	70.5%	50.0%	57.5%	75.5%	5	22:28 +0:53	54.8%	6.8 +0.3
AJ Rohosy	33	20:43	51.6%	252	186	22	17	17	33	89	112–202	55.4%	0–0	—	28–74	37.8%	55.4%	53.7%	36.6%	5	26:12 +5:29	63.9%	10.6 +3.0
Jeremy Dent-Smith	33	19:57	49.7%	270	58	50	26	3	41	59	31–88	35.2%	58–153	37.9%	34–41	82.9%	49.0%	52.1%	17.0%	5	13:47 −6:10	33.6%	8.0 −0.2
Chisom Okpara	17	28:32	36.6%	237	66	38	19	6	45	33	51–117	43.6%	17–56	30.4%	84–115	73.0%	44.2%	53.0%	66.5%	—	—	—	—
Oskar Giltay	32	14:24	34.8%	107	132	11	21	39	21	64	42–67	62.7%†	0–0	—	23–40	57.5%	62.7%†	63.2%†	59.7%†	5	12:27 −1:57	30.4%	2.4 −0.9
Donavin Young	21	15:31	24.6%	53	56	14	9	18	8	31	14–30	46.7%†	8–27	29.6%†	1–2	50.0%†	45.6%†	45.8%†	3.5%†	5	20:22 +4:51	49.7%	3.8 +1.3
Jaylen Thompson	20	11:04	16.7%	46	24	6	7	4	7	23	16–25	64.0%†	4–19	21.1%†	2–3	66.7%†	50.0%†	50.8%†	6.8%†	5	19:13 +8:09	46.9%	5.4 +3.1
Cameron Grant	20	10:27	15.8%	43	25	8	2	3	7	18	1–4	25.0%†	13–53	24.5%	2–2	100.0%†	36.0%†	37.1%†	3.5%†	1	0:49 −9:38	0.4%	0.0 −2.1
Kristers SkrindaFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	5:44	3.9%	7	14	1	1	0	1	2	2–5	40.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	0–0	—	38.9%†	38.9%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Evan StinsonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	5:14	1.6%	7	2	1	2	0	1	3	1–1	100.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	2–2	100.0%†	50.0%†	59.5%†	40.0%†	—	—	—	—
Tallis ToureFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	3:30	0.5%	0	2	0	0	1	0	0	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Ethan KitchFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	0:37	0.1%	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:49 +0:12	0.4%	3.0 +2.0
Team, games with logs · season totals	33 games			2508	1126	391	not published	127	348	not published	550–1090	50.5%	301–856	35.2%	505–690	73.2%	51.5%	55.7%	35.5%
Sum of players				2508	1018	390	257	127	319	583	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+108	+1	not published	0	+29	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.60M; 80% Range $2.55M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.60M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 15; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Ebuka Okorie	84.9%	$905K	$570K to $1.75M	24.5%	$905K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Benny Gealer	73.8%	$580K	$325K to $985K	16.1%	$580K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Aidan Cammann	53.5%	$300K	$115K to $470K	9.0%	$300K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Ryan Agarwal	52.3%	$270K	$55K to $450K	8.1%	$270K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
AJ Rohosy	51.6%	$330K	$155K to $540K	9.6%	$330K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Jeremy Dent-Smith	48.5%	$265K	$73K to $430K	8.0%	$265K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Chisom Okpara	38.0%	$175K	$39K to $295K	5.3%	$175K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Oskar Giltay	34.7%	$265K	$160K to $420K	7.5%	$265K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Donavin Young	25.0%	$95K	$21K to $185K	2.9%	$95K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaylen Thompson	16.4%	$99K	$43K to $155K	3.0%	$99K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Cameron Grant	15.0%	$56K	$19K to $110K	1.7%	$56K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Kristers Skrinda	4.1%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Evan Stinson	1.6%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Tallis Toure	0.7%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Ethan Kitch	0.1%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.60M	$2.55M to $4.95M	100%	$3.60M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Stanford University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$10,765,368	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$10,765,368
Athletics department expenses	$192,802,320
Athletics department revenue	$192,802,320

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 33 games, 2,248 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,508	2,408
Field goals made	851	826
Field goals attempted	1,946	1,816
3-pointers made	301	200
3-pointers attempted	856	607
Free throws made	505	556
Free throws attempted	690	732
Offensive rebounds	376	318
Defensive rebounds	750	782
Total rebounds	1,126	1,100
Assists	391	345
Blocks	127	105
Turnovers	348	404
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 257.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 583.
Minutes (derived)	6,625	not published

33 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,508	2,508	0	±12.5	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	851	851	0	±4.3	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,946	1,946	0	±9.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	301	301	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	856	856	0	±4.3	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	505	505	0	±2.5	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	690	690	0	±3.5	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,126	1,018	+108	±90.1	0
Assists	Reconciled	391	390	+1	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	127	127	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	348	319	+29	±10.4	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	257	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	583	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,625	6,610	+15.5	±132.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Ebuka Okorie	84.9%	+3.3range +2.4 to +4.6Sufficient evidence
Benny Gealer	73.8%	+2.4range +0.9 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Aidan Cammann	53.5%	+0.9range -0.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Ryan Agarwal	52.3%	+0.8range -0.7 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
AJ Rohosy	51.6%	+1.5range +0.4 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Jeremy Dent-Smith	48.5%	+0.9range -0.6 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Chisom Okpara	38.0%	+0.3range -0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Oskar Giltay	34.7%	+2.0range +1.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidence
Donavin Young	25.0%	-0.5range -1.7 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Jaylen Thompson	16.4%	+0.7range -0.1 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Cameron Grant	15.0%	-0.9range -2.1 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Kristers Skrinda	4.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Evan Stinson	1.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Tallis Toure	0.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ethan Kitch	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.8range +9.9 to +11.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.7% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value