UNLV

MWC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 197 · Raw net -0.9 · Tempo 70.5 · 34 Division I games · Through 2026-03-22

Record: 17–17; 17 wins
AdjNet: 3.2β; rank 125 of 365
AdjO: 112.1β; rank 90 of 365
AdjD: 108.9β; rank 196 of 365
AdjT: 70.4β
SOS: 4.6β; rank 80 of 363
NCSOS: 0.7β
WAB: -5.9β; rank 127 of 363
RR: 1.5β
Exp. W: 15.5β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	110.2131	111.1250	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	53.684	52.3231	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.1210	17.4126	16.7
Offensive rebound %	30.2190	32.0256	30.6
FTA / FGA %	40.750	44.9349	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.2102	35.2258	33.9
2P%	54.086	52.1201	51.7
FT%	67.7331	72.6195	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	36.4	36.6	39.5
Assists / FGM %	51.3	56.2	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	12.7	7.8	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	28.5	28.2	31.4
2-pointers %	51.0	48.1	48.8
Free throws %	20.4	23.7	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.7
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 32%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-04	UT Martin	L 81–86	80.2	Home	0–1
11-08	Chattanooga	W 101–69	67.8	Home	1–1
11-11	Montana	L 93–102	80.8	Home	1–2
11-16	Memphis	W 92–78	79.8	Away	2–2
11-20	Saint Joseph's	W 99–85	79.7	Home	3–2
11-25	Maryland	L 67–74	73.2	—	3–3
11-26	Alabama	L 76–115	78.6	—	3–4
11-27	Rutgers	L 65–80	69.3	Neutral	3–5
12-07	Stanford	W 75–74	72.3	Away	4–5
12-13	Tennessee St.	L 60–63	71.2	Home	4–6
12-20	Fresno St.	W 84–72	68.8	Home	5–6
01-03	Air Force	W 67–39	65.3	Home	6–6
01-06	Wyoming	L 66–98	72.1	Away	6–7
01-09	Colorado St.	L 62–70	64.1	Away	6–8
01-13	Boise St.	W 89–85 1OT	80.0	Home	7–8
01-17	San Jose St.	W 76–62	56.3	Away	8–8
01-20	Utah St.	W 86–76	68.3	Away	9–8
01-24	San Diego St.	L 71–82	67.9	Home	9–9
01-27	New Mexico	L 61–89	74.8	Home	9–10
01-30	Nevada	L 76–89	67.0	Away	9–11
02-03	Fresno St.	L 96–98	79.5	Away	9–12
02-07	Grand Canyon	W 80–78	71.8	Home	10–12
02-10	San Jose St.	W 82–75	67.7	Home	11–12
02-13	Boise St.	W 86–83 1OT	69.5	Away	12–12
02-18	Colorado St.	L 86–91	65.4	Home	12–13
02-21	Air Force	W 91–66	69.0	Away	13–13
02-25	Grand Canyon	L 67–80	69.5	Away	13–14
02-28	Nevada	W 85–83 1OT	75.4	Home	14–14
03-03	Utah St.	W 92–65	70.3	Home	15–14
03-06	San Diego St.	L 86–89	73.7	Away	15–15
03-11	Wyoming	W 73–70	65.6	Neutral	16–15
03-12	Utah St.	L 60–80	69.8	Neutral	16–16
03-17	UC Irvine	W 75–72	74.0	—	17–16
03-22	Tulsa	L 66–77	65.8	—	17–17

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 34 of 34 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Dra Gibbs-Lawhorn	34	34:27	85.2%	20.7	3.1	2.5	1.4	0.5	2.4	3.3	153–268	57.1%	98–240	40.8%	105–126	83.3%	59.1%	62.6%	24.8%	5	37:26 +2:59	93.6%	21.0 +0.3
Kimani Hamilton	34	29:18	72.4%	12.9	4.9	2.3	1.2	0.4	1.6	3.6	117–217	53.9%	34–99	34.3%	104–143	72.7%	53.2%	58.1%	45.3%	5	34:23 +5:06	86.0%	13.6 +0.7
Howie Fleming Jr.	31	29:14	65.9%	9.0	6.3	3.6	1.1	0.1	2.0	2.7	63–124	50.8%	25–79	31.6%	77–96	80.2%	49.5%	56.7%	47.3%	4	31:19 +2:05	62.6%	7.0 −2.0
Tyrin Jones	31	27:12	61.3%	11.8	5.1	1.5	1.1	2.2	1.1	1.8	141–233	60.5%	1–7	14.3%†	80–166	48.2%	59.4%	58.3%	69.2%	5	30:43 +3:31	76.8%	13.8 +2.0
Issac Williamson	32	22:57	53.4%	8.6	1.8	1.1	0.8	0.2	1.5	2.6	48–107	44.9%	43–128	33.6%	51–77	66.2%	47.9%	51.3%	32.8%	5	20:36 −2:20	51.5%	7.2 −1.4
Walter Brown	33	20:16	48.6%	3.8	2.8	1.1	0.5	0.4	0.9	2.2	28–54	51.9%	17–49	34.7%†	20–35	57.1%	51.9%	53.6%	34.0%	5	33:56 +13:40	84.8%	6.6 +2.8
Jacob Bannarbie	29	16:23	34.5%	5.3	4.6	1.4	0.6	0.3	1.2	2.3	52–97	53.6%	1–4	25.0%†	48–76	63.2%	53.0%	57.6%	75.2%	4	17:43 +1:20	35.4%	4.8 −0.6
Emmanuel Stephen	23	15:11	25.4%	3.3	4.0	0.3	0.4	0.7	0.8	3.3	32–62	51.6%†	0–0	—	11–26	42.3%	51.6%†	51.1%†	41.9%†	3	3:47 −11:24	5.7%	0.7 −2.6
Al Green	28	12:16	25.0%	4.3	1.1	0.7	0.5	0.1	0.5	0.9	22–43	51.2%†	19–56	33.9%	19–22	86.4%†	51.0%†	55.2%†	22.2%†	1	2:41 −9:35	1.3%	0.0 −4.3
Naas Cunningham	20	12:51	18.7%	5.1	1.1	0.8	0.4	0.0	0.6	0.8	20–45	44.4%†	11–43	25.6%†	29–36	80.6%	41.5%†	49.1%†	40.9%†	1	2:50 −10:01	1.4%	0.0 −5.1
Ladji DembeleFew games	5	20:04	7.3%	5.2	4.2	1.4	0.6	0.8	1.2	3.0	6–13	46.2%†	4–14	28.6%†	2–4	50.0%†	44.4%†	45.2%†	14.8%†	—	—	—	—
Jalen CunninghamFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	2:07	0.9%	0.5	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.2	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	1–3	33.3%†	0–0	—	50.0%†	50.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	34 games			78.6	34.2	14.1	not published	4.6	12.2	not published	682–1263	54.0%	254–722	35.2%	546–807	67.7%	53.6%	57.1%	40.7%
Sum of players				78.6	31.7	14.1	7.3	4.6	11.6	21.4	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+2.5	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.6	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $1.00M; 80% Range $435K to $2.25M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $800K to $1.10M; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 12; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Dra Gibbs-Lawhorn	84.5%	$130K	$38K to $325K	15.1%	$105K to $140K	$8K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kimani Hamilton	71.3%	$170K	$60K to $445K	16.2%	$135K to $180K	$8K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Howie Fleming Jr.	66.3%	$170K	$64K to $420K	15.7%	$135K to $180K	$8K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tyrin Jones	60.3%	$110K	$33K to $285K	11.6%	$86K to $120K	$8K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Issac Williamson	51.9%	$43K	$6K to $140K	5.7%	$34K to $47K	$8K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Walter Brown	49.7%	$100K	$30K to $280K	10.3%	$80K to $110K	$8K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jacob Bannarbie	37.6%	$98K	$38K to $275K	9.2%	$78K to $105K	$8K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Emmanuel Stephen	25.6%	$32K	$7K to $89K	3.9%	$25K to $34K	$8K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Al Green	24.0%	$30K	$7K to $84K	3.7%	$24K to $33K	$8K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Naas Cunningham	20.9%	$26K	$6K to $71K	3.2%	$20K to $28K	$8K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ladji Dembele	6.9%	$8K	$3K to $19K	0.8%	$6K to $9K	$8K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalen Cunningham	1.0%	$8K	$3K to $19K	0.8%	$6K to $9K	$8K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$1.00M	$435K to $2.25M	100%	$800K to $1.10M	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Nevada-Las Vegas (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$10,002,990
Men's basketball expenses	$5,338,081
Athletics department expenses	$74,767,674
Athletics department revenue	$77,272,658

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 34 games, 2,425 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	78.6	79.3
Field goals made	27.5	26.5
Field goals attempted	58.4	57.7
3-pointers made	7.5	7.4
3-pointers attempted	21.2	21.1
Free throws made	16.1	18.8
Free throws attempted	23.7	25.9
Offensive rebounds	10.5	11.1
Defensive rebounds	23.7	24.2
Total rebounds	34.2	35.4
Assists	14.1	14.9
Blocks	4.6	2.9
Turnovers	12.2	12.4
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 248.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 729.
Minutes (derived)	202.2	not published

34 of 34 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,672	2,672	0	±13.4	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	936	936	0	±4.7	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,985	1,985	0	±9.9	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	254	254	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	722	722	0	±3.6	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	546	546	0	±2.7	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	807	807	0	±4.0	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,163	1,079	+84	±93.0	0
Assists	Reconciled	480	480	0	±2.4	0
Blocks	Reconciled	158	158	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	414	395	+19	±12.4	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	248	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	729	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,875	6,858	+17.0	±137.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Dra Gibbs-Lawhorn	84.5%	+0.7range -0.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Kimani Hamilton	71.3%	+1.9range +0.4 to +3.1Sufficient evidence
Howie Fleming Jr.	66.3%	+2.1range +0.6 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Tyrin Jones	60.3%	+1.1range -0.2 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Issac Williamson	51.9%	-0.8range -1.8 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Walter Brown	49.7%	+1.2range -0.1 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Jacob Bannarbie	37.6%	+2.0range +0.8 to +3.0Sufficient evidence
Emmanuel Stephen	25.6%	-0.3range -1.6 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Al Green	24.0%	-0.3range -1.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Naas Cunningham	20.9%	-0.5range -1.7 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Ladji Dembele	6.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jalen Cunningham	1.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.3range +9.3 to +11.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.4% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.6%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value