Chisom Okpara
Stanford · 2025–26 · 17 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
485:09 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 17
- Minutes per game
- 28:32
- Points per game
- 13.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.9 / 2.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.9 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.5 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 2.7 |
| Season totals | 237 | 66 | 38 | 19 | 6 | 45 | 33 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 68–173 | 39.3% | 10.2 | 14.3 |
| 2P | 51–117 | 43.6% | 6.9 | 9.6 |
| 3P | 17–56 | 30.4% | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| FT | 84–115 | 73.0% | 6.8 | 9.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.2% | 53.0% | 32.4% | 66.5% | 0.84 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Stanford · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $175K
- 80% range $39K to $295K
- Median share of team pool
- 5.3%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $175K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 38.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Stanford: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Stanford | $175Kspeculative | $39K to $295K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -0.8 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -0.1 | +2.7range +2.3 to +3.0 | 1,602 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Stanford | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.1 | -1.0 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -0.5 | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.3 | 1,503 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Harvard | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.7 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.5 | +2.6range +2.1 to +3.1 | 2,321 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Harvard | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.8 | -1.6 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -0.3 | +1.6range +1.3 to +2.0 | 1,661 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 26:42 | 28:32 | 20:01–34:34 | |
| Points | 11.4 | 13.9 | 3.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 26.6% | 44.9% | 0.0%–108.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-10 | Virginia | L 55–70 | 20:01 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Virginia Tech | W 69–68 | 27:05 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1-11 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 9.1% |
| 2026-01-02 | Louisville | W 80–76 | 30:24 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5-11 | 2-3 | 5-9 | 54.5% |
| 2025-12-30 | Notre Dame | L 40–47 | 27:50 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-14 | 2-7 | 5-6 | 28.6% |
| 2025-12-27 | CSUN | W 88–80 | 28:08 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-11 | 1-6 | 11-14 | 40.9% |
| 2025-12-20 | Colorado | W 77–68 | 27:35 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-12 | 1-5 | 4-10 | 29.2% |
| 2025-12-17 | UT Arlington | W 76–60 | 32:14 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-13 | San Jose St. | W 86–82 | 26:58 | 20 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-6 | 3-3 | 7-9 | 108.3% |
| 2025-12-07 | UNLV | L 74–75 | 28:44 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-01 | Portland | W 94–72 | 27:30 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 4-6 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-28 | Saint Louis | W 78–77 | 34:34 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5-13 | 2-3 | 7-10 | 46.2% |
| 2025-11-27 | Minnesota | W 72–68 | 29:12 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-15 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Seattle U | L 69–77 | 33:21 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 5-14 | 1-3 | 3-6 | 39.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Louisiana | W 93–66 | 27:04 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7-10 | 1-3 | 7-7 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | Montana St. | W 77–68 | 31:02 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-08 | Montana | W 91–68 | 24:35 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-10 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | Portland St. | W 89–79 | 28:52 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7-11 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 63.6% |