Ebuka Okorie
Stanford · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1088:24 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 35:07
- Points per game
- 23.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 3.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 23.2 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 26.4 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Season totals | 719 | 113 | 111 | 49 | 10 | 58 | 43 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 234–503 | 46.5% | 16.2 | 18.5 |
| 2P | 171–325 | 52.6% | 10.5 | 11.9 |
| 3P | 63–178 | 35.4% | 5.7 | 6.5 |
| FT | 188–226 | 83.2% | 7.3 | 8.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.8% | 59.7% | 35.4% | 44.9% | 1.91 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Stanford · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $905K
- 80% range $570K to $1.75M
- Median share of team pool
- 24.5%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $905K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 84.9%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Stanford: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Stanford | $905Kspeculative | $570K to $1.75M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.3 | +2.4 to +4.6 | Sufficient evidence | +3.1 | +0.3 | +7.7range +7.0 to +8.4 | 3,587 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 37:41 | 35:07 | 25:23–42:52 | |
| Points | 25.4 | 23.2 | 7.0–40.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 61.9% | 52.6% | 6.3%–75.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-02 | West Virginia | L 77–82 | 42:52 | 34 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 13-23 | 1-6 | 7-9 | 58.7% |
| 2026-03-10 | Pittsburgh | L 63–64 | 35:30 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 55.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | NC State | W 85–84 | 38:16 | 33 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 13-22 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 70.5% |
| 2026-03-04 | Notre Dame | W 86–78 | 35:09 | 24 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10-19 | 3-6 | 1-4 | 60.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | SMU | W 95–75 | 36:37 | 22 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 9-10 | 65.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Pittsburgh | W 75–67 | 39:09 | 34 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 11-19 | 3-6 | 9-9 | 65.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | California | L 66–72 | 39:56 | 17 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6-14 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 53.6% |
| 2026-02-14 | Wake Forest | L 63–68 | 38:06 | 26 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10-21 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 54.8% |
| 2026-02-11 | Boston College | W 70–64 | 38:21 | 22 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8-14 | 2-5 | 4-5 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Georgia Tech | W 95–72 | 36:20 | 40 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 12-21 | 3-6 | 13-13 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-04 | Clemson | L 64–66 | 37:43 | 18 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-11 | 2-3 | 4-4 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-31 | Florida St. | L 80–88 | 35:48 | 26 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9-19 | 3-7 | 5-6 | 55.3% |
| 2026-01-28 | Miami (FL) | L 70–79 | 32:40 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8-21 | 1-5 | 2-3 | 40.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | California | L 66–78 | 31:29 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-16 | 0-9 | 12-14 | 6.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | Duke | L 50–80 | 31:15 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3-9 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 38.9% |
| 2026-01-14 | North Carolina | W 95–90 | 35:52 | 36 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12-20 | 3-5 | 9-11 | 67.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | Virginia | L 55–70 | 29:45 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-20 | 0-6 | 4-5 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Virginia Tech | W 69–68 | 37:55 | 31 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11-18 | 4-8 | 5-5 | 72.2% |
| 2026-01-02 | Louisville | W 80–76 | 37:35 | 28 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9-18 | 2-5 | 8-10 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-30 | Notre Dame | L 40–47 | 34:36 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-14 | 0-6 | 1-2 | 21.4% |
| 2025-12-27 | CSUN | W 88–80 | 36:58 | 30 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9-18 | 4-9 | 8-10 | 61.1% |
| 2025-12-20 | Colorado | W 77–68 | 31:47 | 32 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-13 | 2-5 | 18-21 | 53.8% |
| 2025-12-07 | UNLV | L 74–75 | 32:52 | 18 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4-16 | 1-6 | 9-12 | 28.1% |
| 2025-12-01 | Portland | W 94–72 | 25:23 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-9 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-28 | Saint Louis | W 78–77 | 35:23 | 17 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-14 | 3-8 | 8-10 | 32.1% |
| 2025-11-27 | Minnesota | W 72–68 | 38:39 | 25 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9-21 | 2-7 | 5-7 | 47.6% |
| 2025-11-21 | Seattle U | L 69–77 | 28:31 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-15 | 0-5 | 7-9 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Louisiana | W 93–66 | 33:42 | 26 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-10 | 3-5 | 11-13 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | Montana St. | W 77–68 | 34:56 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-15 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Montana | W 91–68 | 32:55 | 29 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11-16 | 2-5 | 5-6 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | Portland St. | W 89–79 | 32:24 | 26 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9-17 | 2-6 | 6-6 | 58.8% |