Jordan Pope
Texas · 2025–26 · 35 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1009:28 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 35
- Minutes per game
- 28:51
- Points per game
- 13.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.1 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.1 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 457 | 73 | 60 | 14 | 2 | 31 | 71 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 145–369 | 39.3% | 10.5 | 14.6 |
| 2P | 62–143 | 43.4% | 4.1 | 5.7 |
| 3P | 83–226 | 36.7% | 6.5 | 9.0 |
| FT | 84–100 | 84.0% | 2.9 | 4.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.5% | 55.3% | 61.2% | 27.1% | 1.94 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Texas · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $500K
- 80% range $290K to $760K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.3%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $500K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 72.1%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Texas: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Texas | $500Kspeculative | $290K to $760K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.6 | +1.4 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +2.8 | -0.2 | +5.5range +4.9 to +6.0 | 3,260 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Texas | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.0 | -1.4 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | -1.9 | +3.2range +2.5 to +4.0 | 2,800 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Oregon St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.6 | -2.8 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -2.2 | +2.3range +1.7 to +2.9 | 3,596 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Oregon St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.3 | -1.8 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.3 | +2.3range +1.7 to +2.9 | 2,788 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:12 | 28:51 | 4:08–39:28 | |
| Points | 12.2 | 13.1 | 0.0–30.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.4% | 47.5% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-26 | Purdue | L 77–79 | 33:10 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-10 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-03-21 | Gonzaga | W 74–68 | 32:11 | 17 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-18 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 47.2% |
| 2026-03-19 | BYU | W 79–71 | 32:16 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-11 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-17 | NC State | W 68–66 | 36:46 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-03-11 | Ole Miss | L 66–76 | 36:38 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6-15 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 53.3% |
| 2026-03-07 | Oklahoma | L 85–88 | 29:37 | 30 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-25 | 7-18 | 7-7 | 46.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | Arkansas | L 85–105 | 4:08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Texas A&M | W 76–70 | 39:28 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6-11 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 63.6% |
| 2026-02-25 | Florida | L 71–84 | 25:51 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-11 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 45.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Georgia | L 80–91 | 33:38 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-9 | 3-4 | 4-5 | 72.2% |
| 2026-02-17 | LSU | W 88–85 | 27:12 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-8 | 3-3 | 5-8 | 81.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Missouri | W 85–68 | 25:10 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-13 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 46.2% |
| 2026-02-07 | Ole Miss | W 79–68 | 20:58 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 38.9% |
| 2026-02-03 | South Carolina | W 84–75 | 25:48 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-31 | Oklahoma | W 79–69 | 31:07 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-9 | 2-7 | 2-3 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-28 | Auburn | L 82–88 | 34:32 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 4-5 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-24 | Georgia | W 87–67 | 31:12 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 5-5 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-21 | Kentucky | L 80–85 | 32:19 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-6 | 4-5 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-17 | Texas A&M | L 70–74 | 32:35 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-12 | 4-9 | 3-3 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-14 | Vanderbilt | W 80–64 | 35:23 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | Alabama | W 92–88 | 30:12 | 28 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8-17 | 6-13 | 6-6 | 64.7% |
| 2026-01-06 | Tennessee | L 71–85 | 13:24 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Mississippi St. | L 98–101 | 27:04 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-13 | 1-8 | 0-0 | 34.6% |
| 2025-12-22 | UMES | W 94–71 | 32:37 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-12 | 5-9 | 2-2 | 79.2% |
| 2025-12-16 | Le Moyne | W 95–53 | 22:36 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-10 | 3-8 | 2-2 | 45.0% |
| 2025-12-12 | UConn | L 63–71 | 32:19 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 55.0% |
| 2025-12-08 | Southern U. | W 95–69 | 30:01 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-9 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Virginia | L 69–88 | 26:33 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-5 | 4-4 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-26 | NC State | W 102–97 | 37:29 | 28 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-15 | 7-13 | 5-6 | 76.7% |
| 2025-11-24 | Arizona St. | L 86–87 | 31:37 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-11 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-18 | Rider | W 99–65 | 25:19 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-15 · NCAA | Kansas City | W 71–55 | 25:24 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-11 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 9.1% |
| 2025-11-12 | FDU | W 93–58 | 22:19 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-10 | 2-8 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Lafayette | W 97–60 | 22:56 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 3-5 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-04 | Duke | L 60–75 | 29:39 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-10 | 3-4 | 6-7 | 45.0% |