BYU

B12 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 39 · Raw net 11.5 · Tempo 70.4 · 35 Division I games · Through 2026-03-19

Record: 23–12; 23 wins
AdjNet: 18.6β; rank 24 of 365
AdjO: 121.3β; rank 11 of 365
AdjD: 102.7β; rank 52 of 365
AdjT: 70.3β
SOS: 9.9β; rank 17 of 363
NCSOS: 2.6β
WAB: 3.4β; rank 28 of 363
RR: 0.0β
Exp. W: 23.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	118.332	106.8128	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	54.454	51.2173	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.281	16.4196	16.7
Offensive rebound %	34.361	29.6145	30.6
FTA / FGA %	34.4198	28.943	35.0
Shooting
3P%	34.5144	35.3268	33.9
2P%	56.238	50.1102	51.7
FT%	74.794	70.677	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	39.8	39.0	39.5
Assists / FGM %	44.9	54.1	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	11.8	8.1	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	30.6	33.6	31.4
2-pointers %	50.3	49.8	48.8
Free throws %	19.1	16.6	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 48%
Bench Share of Minutes: 30%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Villanova	W 71–66	68.0	Neutral	1–0
11-08	Holy Cross	W 98–53	71.9	Home	2–0
11-11	Delaware	W 85–68	60.7	Home	3–0
11-15	UConn	L 84–86	74.4	Neutral	3–1
11-21	Wisconsin	W 98–70	74.6	Neutral	4–1
11-27	Miami (FL)	W 72–62	68.8	Neutral	5–1
11-28	Dayton	W 83–79	74.6	Neutral	6–1
12-03	California Baptist	W 91–60	69.3	Neutral	7–1
12-09	Clemson	W 67–64	60.9	Neutral	8–1
12-13	UC Riverside	W 100–53	75.4	Home	9–1
12-16	Pacific	W 93–57	71.6	Home	10–1
12-19	Abilene Christian	W 85–67	71.6	Home	11–1
12-22	Eastern Wash.	W 109–81	75.1	Home	12–1
01-03	Kansas St.	W 83–73	77.9	Away	13–1
01-07	Arizona St.	W 104–76	77.7	Home	14–1
01-10	Utah	W 89–84	73.4	Away	15–1
01-14	TCU	W 76–70	69.7	Home	16–1
01-17	Texas Tech	L 71–84	70.3	Away	16–2
01-24	Utah	W 91–78	64.6	Home	17–2
01-26	Arizona	L 83–86	75.6	Home	17–3
01-31	Kansas	L 82–90	69.2	Away	17–4
02-04	Oklahoma St.	L 92–99	78.1	Away	17–5
02-07	Houston	L 66–77	58.7	Home	17–6
02-10	Baylor	W 99–94	73.9	Away	18–6
02-14	Colorado	W 90–86 1OT	82.2	Home	19–6
02-18	Arizona	L 68–75	66.2	Away	19–7
02-21	Iowa St.	W 79–69	66.8	Home	20–7
02-24	UCF	L 84–97	77.6	Home	20–8
02-28	West Virginia	L 71–79	63.2	Away	20–9
03-03	Cincinnati	L 68–90	71.7	Away	20–10
03-07	Texas Tech	W 82–76	60.9	Home	21–10
03-10	Kansas St.	W 105–91	77.8	Neutral	22–10
03-11	West Virginia	W 68–48	62.6	Neutral	23–10
03-12	Houston	L 66–73	69.3	Neutral	23–11
03-19	Texas	L 71–79	67.0	—	23–12

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 35 of 35 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Robert Wright III	35	34:49	86.7%	18.1	3.5	4.6	1.2	0.0	2.2	1.6	171–349	49.0%	57–139	41.0%	119–145	82.1%	52.6%	57.3%	29.7%	5	34:51 +0:02	87.1%	16.2 −1.9
AJ Dybantsa	35	34:42	86.4%	25.5	6.8	3.7	1.1	0.3	3.1	1.2	259–456	56.8%	49–148	33.1%	229–296	77.4%	55.0%	60.9%	49.0%	5	38:57 +4:16	97.4%	29.8 +4.3
Kennard Davis Jr.	32	29:34	67.3%	8.5	2.7	1.3	1.1	0.2	0.7	2.1	41–73	56.2%	53–165	32.1%	30–40	75.0%	50.6%	53.0%	16.8%	5	36:50 +7:16	92.1%	12.8 +4.3
Richie Saunders	25	31:15	55.6%	18.0	5.8	2.1	1.7	0.3	1.6	2.2	85–135	63.0%	64–170	37.6%	89–109	81.7%	59.3%	63.9%	35.7%	—	—	—	—
Keba Keita	33	22:42	53.3%	6.2	7.2	0.3	1.0	1.8	0.8	2.2	87–128	68.0%	0–0	—	32–58	55.2%	68.0%	67.1%	45.3%	5	27:59 +5:18	70.0%	6.4 +0.2
Khadim Mboup	34	15:29	37.5%	2.2	5.1	0.4	0.6	0.5	0.8	2.1	32–57	56.1%†	2–12	16.7%†	6–26	23.1%	50.7%†	47.2%†	37.7%†	5	19:22 +3:53	48.4%	2.4 +0.2
Mihailo Boskovic	34	11:51	28.7%	3.0	1.9	0.6	0.1	0.4	0.6	1.6	22–36	61.1%†	15–53	28.3%	12–15	80.0%†	50.0%†	52.8%†	16.9%†	5	5:10 −6:41	12.9%	1.0 −2.0
Aleksej Kostić	27	11:48	22.7%	4.4	0.9	0.4	0.3	0.0	0.6	1.6	6–16	37.5%	33–90	36.7%	7–8	87.5%†	52.4%	53.9%	7.5%	5	17:14 +5:25	43.1%	6.6 +2.2
Tyler Mrus	27	9:38	18.5%	2.0	0.9	0.3	0.2	0.1	0.2	0.7	1–1	100.0%†	14–47	29.8%†	10–11	90.9%†	45.8%†	51.1%†	22.9%†	2	2:18 −7:20	2.3%	0.0 −2.0
Abdullah Ahmed	20	12:18	17.5%	1.3	2.6	0.3	0.1	1.4	0.5	1.8	10–20	50.0%†	0–0	—	5–12	41.7%†	50.0%†	49.4%†	60.0%†	3	10:18 −2:00	15.4%	0.0 −1.3
Dominique Diomande	24	7:01	12.0%	1.9	1.3	0.1	0.7	0.1	0.2	0.8	15–21	71.4%†	2–16	12.5%†	10–16	62.5%†	48.6%†	52.2%†	43.2%†	5	11:28 +4:27	28.7%	3.2 +1.3
Dawson BakerFew games	6	19:54	8.5%	7.5	1.7	0.5	0.5	0.0	0.8	1.7	5–12	41.7%†	9–19	47.4%†	8–9	88.9%†	59.7%†	64.4%†	29.0%†	—	—	—	—
Xavion StatonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	4:42	3.0%	0.6	0.4	0.3	0.0	0.6	0.1	0.9	2–4	50.0%†	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	50.0%†	51.2%†	50.0%†	—	—	—	—
Jared McGregorFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	1:03	0.5%	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–1	0.0%†	0–5	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	1:20 +0:17	0.7%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per game	35 games			83.5	38.1	13.3	not published	4.4	10.7	not published	736–1309	56.2%	298–864	34.5%	558–747	74.7%	54.4%	58.4%	34.4%
Sum of players				83.5	34.5	13.3	7.2	4.4	10.4	15.9	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.5	−0.0	not published	0.0	+0.3	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.60M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.60M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Robert Wright III	87.0%	$615K	$390K to $920K	17.3%	$615K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
AJ Dybantsa	86.7%	$855K	$565K to $1.35M	23.4%	$855K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Kennard Davis Jr.	67.0%	$285K	$70K to $495K	8.5%	$285K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Richie Saunders	55.2%	$590K	$380K to $1.00M	16.1%	$590K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Keba Keita	54.8%	$410K	$240K to $640K	11.5%	$410K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Khadim Mboup	36.4%	$210K	$85K to $340K	6.2%	$210K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Mihailo Boskovic	29.1%	$67K	$20K to $165K	2.0%	$67K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Aleksej Kostić	23.2%	$84K	$25K to $165K	2.4%	$84K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Abdullah Ahmed	18.7%	$91K	$32K to $155K	2.7%	$91K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Tyler Mrus	18.2%	$95K	$37K to $160K	2.8%	$95K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Dominique Diomande	12.0%	$62K	$27K to $105K	1.8%	$62K in all four	$25K	Limited evidence
Dawson Baker	7.9%	$49K	$25K to $79K	1.4%	$49K in all four	$25K	Limited evidence
Xavion Staton	3.1%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jared McGregor	0.5%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.60M	$2.60M to $4.95M	100%	$3.60M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Brigham Young University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$28,047,261
Men's basketball expenses	$17,030,052
Athletics department expenses	$136,864,784
Athletics department revenue	$153,351,328

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 35 games, 2,471 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	83.5	75.4
Field goals made	29.5	27.2
Field goals attempted	62.1	61.4
3-pointers made	8.5	8.5
3-pointers attempted	24.7	23.9
Free throws made	15.9	12.5
Free throws attempted	21.3	17.7
Offensive rebounds	12.3	10.9
Defensive rebounds	25.8	23.5
Total rebounds	38.1	34.3
Assists	13.3	14.7
Blocks	4.4	3.0
Turnovers	10.7	11.6
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 251.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 555.
Minutes (derived)	200.7	not published

35 of 35 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,924	2,924	0	±14.6	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,034	1,034	0	±5.2	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,173	2,173	0	±10.9	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	298	298	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	864	864	0	±4.3	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	558	558	0	±2.8	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	747	747	0	±3.7	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,333	1,209	+124	±106.6	0
Assists	Reconciled	464	465	−1	±2.3	0
Blocks	Reconciled	155	155	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	376	365	+11	±11.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	251	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	555	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,025	7,001	+24.4	±140.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Robert Wright III	87.0%	+3.5range +2.3 to +4.5Sufficient evidence
AJ Dybantsa	86.7%	+5.1range +3.8 to +6.2Sufficient evidence
Kennard Davis Jr.	67.0%	+1.3range -0.0 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Richie Saunders	55.2%	+5.5range +4.0 to +6.6Sufficient evidence
Keba Keita	54.8%	+3.5range +1.8 to +5.0Sufficient evidence
Khadim Mboup	36.4%	+2.2range +0.5 to +3.8Sufficient evidence
Mihailo Boskovic	29.1%	-1.1range -2.5 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Aleksej Kostić	23.2%	-0.1range -1.5 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Abdullah Ahmed	18.7%	+0.9range -0.2 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
Tyler Mrus	18.2%	+1.4range -0.2 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Dominique Diomande	12.0%	+0.7range -0.3 to +1.5Limited evidence
Dawson Baker	7.9%	+0.7range +0.4 to +0.9Limited evidence
Xavion Staton	3.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jared McGregor	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +12.3range +11.3 to +13.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 99.3% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.7%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 4.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value

BYU