Lassina Traore
Texas · 2025–26 · 22 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
335:07 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 22
- Minutes per game
- 15:14
- Points per game
- 3.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.7 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.2 | 4.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 8.4 | 12.4 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 5.8 |
| Season totals | 70 | 104 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 22 | 49 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 18–44 | 40.9%† | 2.0 | 5.3 |
| 2P | 18–43 | 41.9%† | 2.0 | 5.1 |
| 3P | 0–1 | 0.0%† | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| FT | 34–50 | 68.0% | 2.3 | 6.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40.9%† | 53.0%† | 2.3%† | 113.6%† | 0.64 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Texas · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $94K
- 80% range $28K to $175K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.8%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $94K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 23.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Texas: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Texas | $94Kspeculative | $28K to $175K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.0 | -1.0 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | +0.1 | +1.5range +1.3 to +1.7 | 1,068 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Long Beach St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.5 | +2.2 to +5.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +2.6 | +5.6range +4.8 to +6.5 | 2,872 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Long Beach St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.8 | +2.6 to +5.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | +3.2 | +5.1range +4.4 to +5.7 | 3,008 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | St Louis | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.4 | -1.0 to +0.2 | Limited evidence | -1.3 | +0.9 | Not computed for this season | 322 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 14:29 | 15:14 | 8:15–24:26 | |
| Points | 1.4 | 3.2 | 0.0–10.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 33.3% | 38.3% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-03 | South Carolina | W 84–75 | 15:31 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Oklahoma | W 79–69 | 18:35 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-28 | Auburn | L 82–88 | 9:08 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2026-01-24 | Georgia | W 87–67 | 17:16 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-21 | Kentucky | L 80–85 | 11:53 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Texas A&M | L 70–74 | 9:40 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-14 | Vanderbilt | W 80–64 | 8:15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Alabama | W 92–88 | 21:14 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-06 | Tennessee | L 71–85 | 12:52 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Mississippi St. | L 98–101 | 13:49 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-22 | UMES | W 94–71 | 11:09 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Le Moyne | W 95–53 | 18:43 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 4-7 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-12 | UConn | L 63–71 | 24:26 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-08 | Southern U. | W 95–69 | 12:17 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Virginia | L 69–88 | 18:37 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-4 | — |
| 2025-11-26 | NC State | W 102–97 | 15:25 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Arizona St. | L 86–87 | 9:54 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Rider | W 99–65 | 15:06 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-15 · NCAA | Kansas City | W 71–55 | 22:54 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-12 | FDU | W 93–58 | 17:28 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Lafayette | W 97–60 | 13:22 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-04 | Duke | L 60–75 | 17:33 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 40.0% |