Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Pittsburgh

ACC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 212 · Raw net -2.0 · Tempo 64.5 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-03-11

All seasons
Record
13–20
13 wins
AdjNet
4.1β
rank 109 of 365
AdjO
111.1β
rank 115 of 365
AdjD
106.9β
rank 140 of 365
AdjT
65.1β
SOS
7.2β
rank 50 of 363
NCSOS
-0.9β
WAB
-7.4β
rank 165 of 363
RR
-0.7β
Exp. W
13.7β

Scouting Report

CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.108.4174110.4228108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%51.019253.428051.4
TO / 100 poss.17.322516.220816.7
Offensive rebound %33.97228.16730.6
FTA / FGA %30.430030.98535.0
Shooting
3P%33.420535.226233.9
2P%51.717853.726551.7
FT%67.433676.935672.5
Style
3PA / FGA %42.641.039.5
Assists / FGM %52.351.852.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %9.79.39.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %34.833.231.4
2-pointers %48.548.648.8
Free throws %16.718.219.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
7.4
Top Three Share of Minutes
49%
Bench Share of Minutes
24%
Players with Logged Minutes
10

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03Youngstown St.W 74–5965.6Home1–0
11-07LongwoodW 78–6070.1Home2–0
11-10Eastern Mich.W 78–6669.4Home3–0
11-13West VirginiaL 49–7162.9Away3–1
11-17BucknellW 84–5064.8Home4–1
11-20UCFL 67–7762.8Neutral4–2
11-23QuinnipiacL 75–8368.5Home4–3
11-28Ohio St.W 67–6665.4Home5–3
12-02Texas A&ML 73–8164.8Home5–4
12-07HofstraL 73–8061.5Home5–5
12-13VillanovaL 61–7958.0Away5–6
12-17BinghamtonW 103–6371.6Home6–6
12-21Penn St.W 80–4665.0Neutral7–6
12-30Miami (FL)L 69–7666.2Away7–7
01-03ClemsonL 68–7367.2Home7–8
01-10SyracuseL 72–8366.4Home7–9
01-14Georgia TechW 89–6667.9Away8–9
01-17LouisvilleL 59–10065.4Home8–10
01-21Boston CollegeL 62–6563.6Away8–11
01-24NC StateL 72–8167.8Home8–12
01-27Wake ForestW 80–76 1OT72.0Home9–12
01-31ClemsonL 52–6356.4Away9–13
02-03VirginiaL 47–6760.5Away9–14
02-07SMUL 67–8666.1Home9–15
02-10DukeL 54–7061.3Home9–16
02-14North CarolinaL 65–7965.4Away9–17
02-21Notre DameW 73–6862.7Home10–17
02-25StanfordL 67–7561.4Away10–18
02-28CaliforniaW 72–5667.0Away11–18
03-04Florida St.L 74–7565.6Home11–19
03-07SyracuseW 71–69 1OT68.3Away12–19
03-10StanfordW 64–6358.6Neutral13–19
03-11NC StateL 88–9865.8Neutral13–20

Roster · 10 players

Player logs in 33 of 33 team games

MinutesPer 40 MinutesShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Cameron Corhen3333:5184.0%16.08.12.31.10.62.73.6158–28555.4%14–3836.8%†90–13069.2%55.4%58.9%40.2%533:31 −0:1981.8%18.0 +4.4
Damarco Minor3331:5879.3%10.74.74.31.60.41.92.832–6350.8%55–17431.6%53–6088.3%48.3%53.5%25.3%534:03 +2:0683.1%7.0 −1.5
Barry Dunning Jr.3331:3778.4%15.97.41.00.91.11.42.292–15360.1%59–17134.5%53–7471.6%55.7%58.1%22.8%540:30 +8:5398.8%17.0 +4.5
Omari Witherspoon3328:0069.5%10.84.33.61.20.93.42.767–15543.2%25–8728.7%40–6264.5%43.2%46.2%25.6%533:43 +5:4482.3%9.4 +1.9
Roman Siulepa3326:3465.9%15.18.21.41.60.91.53.795–17155.6%29–9829.6%53–10650.0%51.5%52.3%39.4%528:51 +2:1770.4%7.0 −3.0
Nojus Indrusaitis3323:0857.4%15.75.32.91.60.22.02.851–12142.1%55–14238.7%33–5263.5%50.8%52.5%19.8%525:16 +2:0861.6%14.6 +5.5
Brandin Cummings1926:0037.1%19.22.33.21.10.11.83.648–9252.2%30–9232.6%51–7171.8%50.5%55.1%38.6%————
Macari Moore225:529.7%9.35.95.33.40.34.38.77–2133.3%†3–475.0%†7–887.5%†46.0%†52.6%†32.0%†57:11 +1:2017.5%0.8 −0.6
Papa Amadou Kante813:598.4%7.915.42.50.70.41.15.49–1850.0%†0–20.0%†4–944.4%†45.0%†45.9%†45.0%†————
Kieran Mullen205:288.2%5.58.10.40.40.41.85.95–1145.5%†0–10.0%†5–5100.0%†41.7%†52.8%†41.7%†24:08 −1:204.0%0.0 −0.8
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes33 games70.034.313.13.111.2564–109051.7%270–80933.4%389–57767.4%51.0%54.0%30.4%
Sum of players70.031.213.16.53.110.616.1Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.10.0+0.1+0.6

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$3.55M
80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier
Power 4
medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$3.55M in all four
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
10
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Cameron Corhen84.3%$475K$78K to $780K14.3%$475K in all four$35KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Damarco Minor79.7%$850K$530K to $1.55M22.4%$850K in all four$35KSufficient evidence
Barry Dunning Jr.78.0%$645K$360K to $1.10M17.5%$645K in all four$35KSufficient evidence
Omari Witherspoon69.8%$250K$31K to $505K7.7%$250K in all four$35KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Roman Siulepa66.9%$420K$115K to $680K12.4%$420K in all four$35KSufficient evidence
Nojus Indrusaitis57.3%$295K$43K to $520K8.9%$295K in all four$35KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Brandin Cummings37.3%$260K$83K to $445K7.5%$260K in all four$35KSufficient evidence
Macari Moore9.8%$85K$42K to $140K2.5%$85K in all four$35KLimited evidence
Papa Amadou Kante8.9%$125K$80K to $275K3.3%$125K in all four$35KLimited evidence
Kieran Mullen8.0%$48K$23K to $84K1.4%$48K in all four$35KLimited evidence
Team Pool—$3.55M$2.60M to $4.95M100%$3.55M in all four—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$13,874,103
Men's basketball expenses$11,437,769
Athletics department expenses$151,337,808
Athletics department revenue$151,337,808

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 33 games, 2,146 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1330 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

StatisticTeamOpponents
Points70.071.3
Field goals made25.125.2
Field goals attempted57.154.6
3-pointers made8.17.9
3-pointers attempted24.322.4
Free throws made11.713.0
Free throws attempted17.416.9
Offensive rebounds11.88.8
Defensive rebounds22.522.9
Total rebounds34.331.7
Assists13.113.1
Blocks3.13.0
Turnovers11.210.5
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 216.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 535.
Minutes (derived)200.0

33 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,3272,3270±11.60
Field goals madeReconciled8348340±4.20
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,8991,8990±9.50
3-pointers madeReconciled2702700±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled8098090±4.00
Free throws madeReconciled3893890±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled5775770±2.90
Offensive reboundsNo player split
Defensive reboundsNo player split
Total reboundsResidual shown1,1391,036+103±91.10
AssistsReconciled4364360±2.20
BlocksReconciled104102+2±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown371352+19±11.10
StealsNo team figure216
Personal foulsNo team figure535
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,6506,623+27.1±133.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Cameron Corhen84.3%+0.3range -1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Damarco Minor79.7%+2.2range +1.2 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Barry Dunning Jr.78.0%+1.4range -0.1 to +2.7Sufficient evidence
Omari Witherspoon69.8%-0.9range -2.0 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Roman Siulepa66.9%+0.5range -0.8 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Nojus Indrusaitis57.3%-0.1range -1.4 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Brandin Cummings37.3%+0.7range -0.7 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Macari Moore9.8%+0.3range -0.5 to +1.1Limited evidence
Papa Amadou Kante8.9%+2.3range +1.3 to +3.2Limited evidence
Kieran Mullen8.0%-2.2range -3.0 to -1.5Limited evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+10.1range +9.1 to +11.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 100.0% of on-court time. 0 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 5.3%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value