Quinnipiac

MAAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 141 · Raw net 2.2 · Tempo 69.7 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

Record: 18–13; 18 wins
AdjNet: -1.4β; rank 196 of 365
AdjO: 105.3β; rank 242 of 365
AdjD: 106.8β; rank 135 of 365
AdjT: 70.5β
SOS: -4.0β; rank 289 of 363
NCSOS: 2.1β
WAB: -7.2β; rank 156 of 363
RR: 0.5β
Exp. W: 17.5β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	105.5240	103.364	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	48.2310	48.964	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.9131	17.4127	16.7
Offensive rebound %	34.166	32.0253	30.6
FTA / FGA %	33.8216	30.677	35.0
Shooting
3P%	34.0172	34.9241	33.9
2P%	46.7335	47.128	51.7
FT%	69.1297	73.3239	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	33.7	35.4	39.5
Assists / FGM %	49.4	52.5	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	11.6	11.2	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	28.7	30.8	31.4
2-pointers %	51.8	50.6	48.8
Free throws %	19.5	18.7	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.3
Top Three Share of Minutes: 46%
Bench Share of Minutes: 28%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	St. John's (NY)	L 74–108	83.6	Away	0–1
11-06	Central Conn. St.	W 71–49	69.0	Home	1–1
11-11	Yale	L 60–97	71.4	Home	1–2
11-16	Maine	W 70–64	69.8	Away	2–2
11-23	Pittsburgh	W 83–75	68.5	Away	3–2
11-25	UCF	L 91–102	78.2	Away	3–3
11-30	Stonehill	W 76–62	69.3	Home	4–3
12-05	Iona	W 89–68	73.1	Away	5–3
12-07	Rider	W 72–58	68.5	Home	6–3
12-13	UMass Lowell	W 75–71	75.0	Home	7–3
12-17	Monmouth	W 85–75	72.0	Away	8–3
12-21	Hofstra	L 66–74	67.2	Away	8–4
12-29	Marist	W 64–58	68.4	Home	9–4
01-02	Manhattan	L 79–80	71.7	Away	9–5
01-04	Mount St. Mary's	W 80–69	70.8	Home	10–5
01-11	Sacred Heart	W 70–60	64.7	Away	11–5
01-14	Saint Peter's	L 70–74	69.9	Home	11–6
01-17	Merrimack	L 71–83	67.1	Away	11–7
01-19	Manhattan	W 98–92 1OT	80.1	Home	12–7
01-22	Mount St. Mary's	W 77–62	70.0	Away	13–7
01-24	Marist	L 64–71	66.1	Away	13–8
01-30	Sacred Heart	L 91–98	75.6	Home	13–9
02-01	Fairfield	W 72–65	68.7	Away	14–9
02-05	Canisius	W 75–60	73.3	Home	15–9
02-07	Niagara	W 56–55	59.2	Home	16–9
02-13	Siena	W 74–62	66.8	Away	17–9
02-15	Merrimack	L 49–56	65.3	Home	17–10
02-22	Fairfield	L 79–85	68.4	Home	17–11
02-27	Niagara	L 76–78 1OT	68.6	Away	17–12
03-01	Canisius	W 67–63	66.4	Away	18–12
03-07	Marist	L 75–77	73.1	Neutral	18–13

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Amarri Monroe	30	33:13	79.7%	15.6	8.3	2.2	2.3	0.9	2.6	2.5	134–281	47.7%	36–131	27.5%	93–122	76.2%	45.6%	50.4%	29.6%	4	33:10 −0:04	64.7%	14.5 −1.1
Grant Randall	31	32:02	79.4%	11.5	6.7	0.8	0.9	0.7	0.5	2.2	83–148	56.1%	40–119	33.6%	72–97	74.2%	53.6%	57.8%	36.3%	5	30:07 −1:55	73.5%	13.0 +1.5
Asim Jones	31	29:13	72.5%	12.5	2.4	3.9	1.2	0.2	2.2	2.5	99–233	42.5%	44–95	46.3%	58–77	75.3%	50.3%	53.6%	23.5%	5	28:10 −1:03	68.7%	13.6 +1.1
Jaden Zimmerman	25	33:01	66.0%	15.2	2.3	2.3	0.8	0.5	2.4	2.8	75–183	41.0%	46–147	31.3%	93–138	67.4%	43.6%	48.8%	41.8%	5	34:01 +0:59	83.0%	10.0 −5.2
Keith McKnight	31	24:53	61.7%	10.7	5.9	1.1	1.3	0.7	1.3	2.2	123–225	54.7%	4–15	26.7%†	73–115	63.5%	53.8%	57.0%	47.9%	5	26:21 +1:28	64.3%	12.0 +1.3
Spence Wewe	31	16:33	41.0%	2.4	5.2	0.4	0.3	1.0	0.7	1.7	34–67	50.7%†	0–0	—	7–21	33.3%†	50.7%†	49.2%†	31.3%†	5	23:21 +6:49	57.0%	1.6 −0.8
Nate Guerengomba	28	13:52	31.1%	2.6	1.6	0.6	0.4	0.2	0.6	1.3	23–55	41.8%†	3–17	17.6%†	18–30	60.0%	38.2%†	42.8%†	41.7%†	5	9:58 −3:54	24.3%	1.6 −1.0
Tai Turnage	29	12:05	28.0%	3.4	1.1	1.8	0.4	0.0	0.4	1.1	11–43	25.6%†	16–50	32.0%	29–35	82.9%	37.6%†	45.7%†	37.6%†	5	15:49 +3:44	38.6%	3.2 −0.2
Samson Reilly	27	7:54	17.1%	3.4	0.6	0.3	0.1	0.0	0.2	0.4	3–14	21.4%†	28–62	45.2%	3–5	60.0%†	59.2%†	59.5%†	6.6%†	3	6:39 −1:15	9.7%	2.3 −1.1
Samuel Nosakhare	18	8:35	12.4%	0.8	1.3	0.3	0.4	0.6	0.2	0.8	6–11	54.5%†	0–0	—	2–7	28.6%†	54.5%†	49.7%†	63.6%†	3	8:06 −0:29	11.9%	2.0 +1.2
Braylan RitvoFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	6:58	4.5%	1.5	0.6	0.1	0.4	0.3	0.0	0.9	3–9	33.3%†	2–6	33.3%†	0–1	0.0%†	40.0%†	38.9%†	6.7%†	1	4:27 −2:31	2.2%	0.0 −1.5
Ronell Giles, Jr.Under 100 minutes	10	5:23	4.3%	0.6	0.6	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.6	0.4	1–4	25.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	31.3%†	33.8%†	25.0%†	1	3:37 −1:46	1.8%	0.0 −0.6
Akintola AkinniyiFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	1:32	0.5%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Christopher SkenderiFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	1:32	0.5%	0.0	0.8	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.0	0–1	0.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	31 games			74.2	36.6	13.0	not published	4.5	11.2	not published	595–1274	46.7%	220–647	34.0%	449–650	69.1%	48.2%	52.1%	33.8%
Sum of players				74.2	34.3	13.0	7.8	4.5	10.6	16.6	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+2.3	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.5	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $270K; 80% Range $98K to $690K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $255K to $280K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Grant Randall	80.4%	$30K	$6K to $93K	13.6%	$29K to $31K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Amarri Monroe	80.0%	$76K	$26K to $235K	25.9%	$72K to $78K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Asim Jones	72.3%	$20K	$2K to $69K	9.8%	$19K to $21K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaden Zimmerman	65.2%	$27K	$6K to $81K	11.8%	$26K to $28K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Keith McKnight	61.4%	$22K	$4K to $66K	10.0%	$21K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Spence Wewe	42.2%	$21K	$6K to $64K	8.4%	$20K to $22K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Nate Guerengomba	31.0%	$10K	$2K to $34K	4.6%	$9K to $10K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tai Turnage	27.8%	$20K	$6K to $63K	7.1%	$19K to $21K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Samson Reilly	17.0%	$4K	$1K to $16K	2.0%	$4K to $5K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Samuel Nosakhare	12.4%	$6K	$2K to $18K	2.6%	$6K in all four	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ronell Giles, Jr.	4.6%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Braylan Ritvo	4.6%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Christopher Skenderi	0.5%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Akintola Akinniyi	0.5%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$270K	$98K to $690K	100%	$255K to $280K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Quinnipiac University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,778,760	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,778,760
Athletics department expenses	$31,935,537
Athletics department revenue	$31,935,537

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 31 games, 2,179 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	74.2	72.6
Field goals made	26.3	25.8
Field goals attempted	62.0	60.4
3-pointers made	7.1	7.5
3-pointers attempted	20.9	21.4
Free throws made	14.5	13.5
Free throws attempted	21.0	18.5
Offensive rebounds	12.5	11.3
Defensive rebounds	24.0	24.3
Total rebounds	36.6	35.5
Assists	13.0	13.5
Blocks	4.5	4.6
Turnovers	11.2	12.2
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 241.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 515.
Minutes (derived)	201.6	not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,299	2,299	0	±11.5	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	815	815	0	±4.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,921	1,921	0	±9.6	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	220	220	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	647	647	0	±3.2	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	449	449	0	±2.2	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	650	650	0	±3.3	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,134	1,062	+72	±90.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	403	403	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	140	140	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	346	330	+16	±10.4	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	241	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	515	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,250	6,234	+16.1	±125.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Grant Randall	80.4%	+0.6range -0.6 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Amarri Monroe	80.0%	+3.1range +2.1 to +3.9Sufficient evidence
Asim Jones	72.3%	+0.0range -1.6 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Jaden Zimmerman	65.2%	+0.7range -0.5 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Keith McKnight	61.4%	+0.4range -0.6 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Spence Wewe	42.2%	+1.1range +0.0 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
Nate Guerengomba	31.0%	-0.3range -1.5 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Tai Turnage	27.8%	+1.9range +0.8 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Samson Reilly	17.0%	-1.2range -2.5 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Samuel Nosakhare	12.4%	+0.7range -0.3 to +1.4Limited evidence
Ronell Giles, Jr.	4.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Braylan Ritvo	4.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Christopher Skenderi	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Akintola Akinniyi	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.2range +9.2 to +11.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 97.9% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.5%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value