Kieran Mullen
Pittsburgh · 2025–26 · 20 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
109:14 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 20
- Minutes per game
- 5:28
- Points per game
- 0.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.1 / 0.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 5.5 | 8.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 5.9 |
| Season totals | 15 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 16 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 5–12 | 41.7%† | 0.6 | 4.4 |
| 2P | 5–11 | 45.5%† | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| 3P | 0–1 | 0.0%† | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| FT | 5–5 | 100.0%† | 0.3 | 1.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.7%† | 52.8%† | 8.3%† | 41.7%† | 0.20 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Pittsburgh · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $48K
- 80% range $23K to $84K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.4%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $48K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $35K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 8.0%
- Limited evidence
- Limited evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Pittsburgh: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Pittsburgh | $48Kspeculative | $23K to $84K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -2.2 | -3.0 to -1.5 | Limited evidence | -1.2 | -1.1 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.4 | 332 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 3:16 | 5:28 | 0:00–16:25 | |
| Points | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0–5.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 50.0% | 45.8% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | NC State | L 88–98 | 0:11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-07 | Syracuse | W 71–69 | 8:04 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-25 | Stanford | L 67–75 | 3:18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-14 | North Carolina | L 65–79 | 4:46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-10 | Duke | L 54–70 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-07 | SMU | L 67–86 | 11:41 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Virginia | L 47–67 | 1:42 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-31 | Clemson | L 52–63 | 7:17 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | NC State | L 72–81 | 1:20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-21 | Boston College | L 62–65 | 5:21 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Louisville | L 59–100 | 6:02 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Georgia Tech | W 89–66 | 8:22 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-03 | Clemson | L 68–73 | 2:52 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-30 | Miami (FL) | L 69–76 | 6:17 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-21 | Penn St. | W 80–46 | 10:07 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-17 | Binghamton | W 103–63 | 16:25 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Villanova | L 61–79 | 8:06 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-07 | Hofstra | L 73–80 | 0:53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-02 | Texas A&M | L 73–81 | 1:28 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-17 | Bucknell | W 84–50 | 5:02 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |