Brandin Cummings
Pittsburgh · 2025–26 · 19 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
493:59 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 19
- Minutes per game
- 26:00
- Points per game
- 12.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.5 / 2.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.5 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.2 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 3.6 |
| Season totals | 237 | 29 | 39 | 14 | 1 | 22 | 45 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 78–184 | 42.4% | 9.7 | 14.9 |
| 2P | 48–92 | 52.2%† | 4.8 | 7.4 |
| 3P | 30–92 | 32.6% | 4.8 | 7.4 |
| FT | 51–71 | 71.8% | 3.7 | 5.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.5% | 55.1% | 50.0% | 38.6% | 1.77 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Pittsburgh · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $260K
- 80% range $83K to $445K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.5%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $260K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $35K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 37.3%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Pittsburgh: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Pittsburgh | $260Kspeculative | $83K to $445K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.7 | -0.7 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | -0.9 | +2.5range +2.1 to +2.9 | 1,551 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Pittsburgh | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.1 | -0.4 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +0.2 | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.3 | 1,349 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 25:15 | 26:00 | 11:38–33:43 | |
| Points | 9.2 | 12.5 | 0.0–34.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 39.6% | 46.0% | 0.0%–83.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-31 | Clemson | L 52–63 | 11:38 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-27 | Wake Forest | W 80–76 | 33:21 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-12 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 54.2% |
| 2026-01-24 | NC State | L 72–81 | 27:01 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-11 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-21 | Boston College | L 62–65 | 28:24 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-12 | 1-5 | 4-7 | 29.2% |
| 2026-01-17 | Louisville | L 59–100 | 25:53 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Georgia Tech | W 89–66 | 32:56 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-20 | 3-8 | 2-2 | 52.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | Syracuse | L 72–83 | 32:52 | 29 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11-17 | 2-6 | 5-5 | 70.6% |
| 2026-01-03 | Clemson | L 68–73 | 14:58 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | Miami (FL) | L 69–76 | 16:41 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-21 | Penn St. | W 80–46 | 25:19 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-17 | Binghamton | W 103–63 | 20:41 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 4-6 | 72.2% |
| 2025-12-13 | Villanova | L 61–79 | 27:55 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | Hofstra | L 73–80 | 31:55 | 34 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10-15 | 5-8 | 9-9 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | Texas A&M | L 73–81 | 19:05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | UCF | L 67–77 | 29:49 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 3-3 | 22.2% |
| 2025-11-17 | Bucknell | W 84–50 | 18:54 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-13 | West Virginia | L 49–71 | 31:01 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-13 | 1-8 | 0-0 | 26.9% |
| 2025-11-07 | Longwood | W 78–60 | 33:43 | 19 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 5-8 | 4-5 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Youngstown St. | W 74–59 | 31:53 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 8-11 | 62.5% |