Furman

SC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 115 · Raw net 3.7 · Tempo 66.4 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-20

Record: 19–13; 19 wins
AdjNet: 0.6β; rank 166 of 365
AdjO: 108.4β; rank 170 of 365
AdjD: 107.8β; rank 167 of 365
AdjT: 67.0β
SOS: -3.1β; rank 268 of 363
NCSOS: 0.9β
WAB: -6.9β; rank 149 of 363
RR: 0.2β
Exp. W: 18.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	111.5109	107.8162	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	54.843	50.2110	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.8259	13.7342	16.7
Offensive rebound %	30.5180	28.272	30.6
FTA / FGA %	32.7246	28.945	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.4203	32.377	33.9
2P%	58.814	51.5167	51.7
FT%	70.1269	70.361	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	46.5	41.8	39.5
Assists / FGM %	56.1	47.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.3	10.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	35.2	33.5	31.4
2-pointers %	47.5	49.7	48.8
Free throws %	17.3	16.8	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.8
Top Three Share of Minutes: 43%
Bench Share of Minutes: 34%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	High Point	L 71–97	73.1	Neutral	0–1
11-07	Troy	L 61–64	68.4	Home	0–2
11-14	UNI	L 54–70	64.2	Away	0–3
11-23	Queens (NC)	W 90–79	63.0	Home	1–3
11-27	Richmond	W 73–72	69.0	Neutral	2–3
11-28	Illinois St.	L 65–72	66.9	Neutral	2–4
12-03	Elon	W 97–88	71.8	Away	3–4
12-06	Harvard	W 79–69	68.4	Home	4–4
12-18	Manhattan	W 75–68	69.6	Away	5–4
12-21	Charleston So.	W 84–76	74.3	Home	6–4
12-31	Mercer	W 74–72	67.4	Home	7–4
01-03	Western Caro.	L 77–80 1OT	71.3	Home	7–5
01-07	Chattanooga	W 78–67	68.7	Away	8–5
01-10	VMI	W 69–48	65.9	Home	9–5
01-14	Samford	W 77–73	70.3	Away	10–5
01-17	Wofford	L 70–74	63.6	Home	10–6
01-21	The Citadel	L 75–77 1OT	69.9	Away	10–7
01-23	UNC Greensboro	W 89–66	63.6	Away	11–7
01-29	Samford	W 78–73	64.5	Home	12–7
02-01	Chattanooga	W 75–70	65.8	Home	13–7
02-04	ETSU	L 71–75 1OT	72.6	Away	13–8
02-08	UNC Greensboro	L 64–67	63.0	Home	13–9
02-11	Mercer	L 64–69	66.6	Away	13–10
02-14	VMI	W 90–72	71.0	Away	14–10
02-18	ETSU	L 69–78	68.2	Home	14–11
02-21	Wofford	W 76–67	64.1	Away	15–11
02-25	The Citadel	W 72–51	59.8	Home	16–11
02-28	Western Caro.	L 67–86	63.6	Away	16–12
03-07	Samford	W 86–81	69.0	Neutral	17–12
03-08	UNC Greensboro	W 81–75	65.6	Neutral	18–12
03-09	ETSU	W 76–61	61.8	Neutral	19–12
03-20	UConn	L 71–82	65.4	—	19–13

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Alex Wilkins	32	30:33	75.5%	581	64	151	25	4	124	92	147–267	55.1%	58–182	31.9%	113–138	81.9%	52.1%	57.0%	30.7%	5	28:55 −1:38	72.3%	20.0 +1.8
Charles Johnston	32	28:27	70.3%	307	285	53	21	22	46	81	81–116	69.8%	35–120	29.2%	40–60	66.7%	56.6%	58.5%	25.4%	5	24:02 −4:26	60.1%	6.8 −2.8
Ben Vander Wal	32	28:13	69.7%	223	175	79	23	16	35	73	91–136	66.9%	2–9	22.2%†	35–86	40.7%	64.8%	61.0%	59.3%	5	19:56 −8:17	49.8%	3.8 −3.2
Tom House	30	25:27	59.0%	256	81	43	15	3	22	31	31–65	47.7%	46–148	31.1%	56–66	84.8%	46.9%	52.9%	31.0%	5	26:43 +1:16	66.8%	11.8 +3.3
Asa Thomas	25	27:19	52.7%	292	87	45	9	11	16	32	21–51	41.2%	71–182	39.0%	37–50	74.0%	54.7%	57.3%	21.5%	5	20:21 −6:58	50.9%	4.4 −7.3
Cooper Bowser	22	29:57	50.9%	301	127	36	7	28	30	47	124–164	75.6%	0–1	0.0%†	53–81	65.4%	75.2%	75.0%	49.1%	5	27:48 −2:09	69.5%	15.0 +1.3
Eddrin Bronson	31	19:00	45.5%	172	53	30	11	10	36	42	27–59	45.8%	28–85	32.9%	34–46	73.9%	47.9%	52.4%	31.9%	5	23:31 +4:31	58.8%	7.6 +2.1
Cole Bowser	20	22:22	34.5%	103	106	11	12	6	19	41	20–35	57.1%†	14–39	35.9%†	21–24	87.5%†	55.4%†	60.9%†	32.4%†	5	19:39 −2:43	49.1%	5.4 +0.3
Abijah Franklin	21	10:32	17.1%	82	34	18	13	1	16	27	14–43	32.6%†	12–35	34.3%†	18–27	66.7%	41.0%†	45.6%†	34.6%†	5	8:34 −1:59	21.4%	1.4 −2.5
Collin O'Neal	15	10:37	12.3%	50	20	6	4	2	11	19	7–17	41.2%†	10–24	41.7%†	6–10	60.0%†	53.7%†	55.1%†	24.4%†	—	—	—	—
Owen RitgerUnder 100 minutes	14	6:53	7.4%	17	7	5	0	1	7	6	6–13	46.2%†	1–4	25.0%†	2–4	50.0%†	44.1%†	45.3%†	23.5%†	—	—	—	—
Mason SmithFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	11:49	3.6%	14	20	0	0	0	2	3	1–3	33.3%†	4–11	36.4%†	0–0	—	50.0%†	50.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Thomas TillmanFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	0:27	0.1%	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:00 −0:27	0.0%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · season totals	32 games			2398	1164	477	not published	104	383	not published	570–969	58.8%	281–841	33.4%	415–592	70.1%	54.8%	57.9%	32.7%
Sum of players				2398	1059	477	140	104	364	495	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+105	0	not published	0	+19	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $290K; 80% Range $105K to $755K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $275K to $310K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Alex Wilkins	75.7%	$23K	$4K to $75K	10.4%	$21K to $24K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Charles Johnston	70.7%	$72K	$24K to $225K	23.7%	$70K to $79K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ben Vander Wal	70.2%	$40K	$10K to $130K	14.6%	$39K to $43K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tom House	59.7%	$37K	$11K to $115K	13.1%	$35K to $40K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Asa Thomas	52.7%	$19K	$3K to $61K	8.3%	$18K to $21K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cooper Bowser	50.5%	$21K	$5K to $65K	8.8%	$20K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eddrin Bronson	44.5%	$8K	$1K to $35K	3.8%	$7K to $8K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cole Bowser	34.5%	$18K	$5K to $54K	7.0%	$17K to $20K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Abijah Franklin	17.7%	$7K	$2K to $23K	3.2%	$7K to $8K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Collin O'Neal	12.0%	$4K	$1K to $14K	1.8%	$4K to $5K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Owen Ritger	7.9%	$3K	$1K to $9K	1.1%	$3K in all four	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mason Smith	3.8%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Thomas Tillman	0.1%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$290K	$105K to $755K	100%	$275K to $310K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Furman University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$4,052,982	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$4,052,982
Athletics department expenses	$32,623,716
Athletics department revenue	$32,623,716

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 32 games, 2,150 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,398	2,319
Field goals made	851	835
Field goals attempted	1,810	1,921
3-pointers made	281	259
3-pointers attempted	841	803
Free throws made	415	390
Free throws attempted	592	555
Offensive rebounds	321	331
Defensive rebounds	843	733
Total rebounds	1,164	1,064
Assists	477	398
Blocks	104	103
Turnovers	383	294
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 140.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 495.
Minutes (derived)	6,475	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,398	2,398	0	±12.0	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	851	851	0	±4.3	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,810	1,810	0	±9.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	281	281	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	841	841	0	±4.2	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	415	415	0	±2.1	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	592	592	0	±3.0	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,164	1,059	+105	±93.1	0
Assists	Reconciled	477	477	0	±2.4	0
Blocks	Reconciled	104	104	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	383	364	+19	±11.5	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	140	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	495	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,475	6,458	+16.9	±129.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Alex Wilkins	75.7%	+0.1range -0.7 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Charles Johnston	70.7%	+3.4range +2.3 to +4.5Sufficient evidence
Ben Vander Wal	70.2%	+1.5range -0.2 to +3.1Sufficient evidence
Tom House	59.7%	+1.8range +0.3 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Asa Thomas	52.7%	+0.3range -1.0 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Cooper Bowser	50.5%	+0.7range -0.4 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Eddrin Bronson	44.5%	-1.2range -2.5 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Cole Bowser	34.5%	+1.2range +0.1 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
Abijah Franklin	17.7%	+0.3range -0.9 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Collin O'Neal	12.0%	-0.7range -1.5 to +0.3Limited evidence
Owen Ritger	7.9%	-1.9range -2.5 to -1.3Limited evidence
Mason Smith	3.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Thomas Tillman	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.4range +9.6 to +11.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.2% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 4.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value