Asa Thomas
Furman · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
683:04 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 25
- Minutes per game
- 27:19
- Points per game
- 11.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.5 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.7 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.1 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.9 |
| Season totals | 292 | 87 | 45 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 32 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 92–233 | 39.5% | 9.3 | 13.6 |
| 2P | 21–51 | 41.2%† | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| 3P | 71–182 | 39.0% | 7.3 | 10.7 |
| FT | 37–50 | 74.0% | 2.0 | 2.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.7% | 57.3% | 78.1% | 21.5% | 2.81 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Furman · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $19K
- 80% range $3K to $61K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.3%
- team pool $290K, 80% range $105K to $755K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $18K to $21K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 52.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Furman: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Furman | $19Kspeculative | $3K to $61K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -1.0 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | -1.0 | +3.8range +3.2 to +4.3 | 2,199 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 20:21 | 27:19 | 11:39–40:03 | |
| Points | 4.4 | 11.7 | 0.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 42.1% | 53.8% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-20 | UConn | L 71–82 | 17:02 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-09 | ETSU | W 76–61 | 19:32 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-08 | UNC Greensboro | W 81–75 | 15:50 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Samford | W 86–81 | 18:48 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-28 | Western Caro. | L 67–86 | 30:34 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | The Citadel | W 72–51 | 23:31 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 3-5 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Wofford | W 76–67 | 28:00 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-9 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | ETSU | L 69–78 | 28:47 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-16 | 3-12 | 2-3 | 34.4% |
| 2026-02-14 | VMI | W 90–72 | 32:14 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-16 | 6-13 | 3-3 | 68.8% |
| 2026-02-11 | Mercer | L 64–69 | 32:39 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-16 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-08 | UNC Greensboro | L 64–67 | 31:17 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-10 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | VMI | W 69–48 | 11:39 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Chattanooga | W 78–67 | 34:02 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 3-5 | 7-8 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Western Caro. | L 77–80 | 40:03 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-14 | 1-8 | 3-3 | 17.9% |
| 2025-12-31 | Mercer | W 74–72 | 36:04 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6-11 | 4-9 | 3-5 | 72.7% |
| 2025-12-21 | Charleston So. | W 84–76 | 36:39 | 25 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8-14 | 6-10 | 3-4 | 78.6% |
| 2025-12-18 | Manhattan | W 75–68 | 32:46 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-8 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Harvard | W 79–69 | 33:35 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-11 | 5-9 | 1-1 | 77.3% |
| 2025-12-03 | Elon | W 97–88 | 32:50 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 5-11 | 4-4 | 70.8% |
| 2025-11-28 | Illinois St. | L 65–72 | 28:11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-9 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-27 | Richmond | W 73–72 | 33:52 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-15 | 5-12 | 1-3 | 63.3% |
| 2025-11-23 | Queens (NC) | W 90–79 | 30:08 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-12 | 3-11 | 3-6 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-14 | UNI | L 54–70 | 14:02 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Troy | L 61–64 | 22:22 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-03 | High Point | L 71–97 | 18:37 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 80.0% |