Eddrin Bronson
Furman · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
588:58 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 19:00
- Points per game
- 5.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.7 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.5 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.7 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 172 | 53 | 30 | 11 | 10 | 36 | 42 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 55–144 | 38.2% | 4.6 | 9.8 |
| 2P | 27–59 | 45.8%† | 1.9 | 4.0 |
| 3P | 28–85 | 32.9% | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| FT | 34–46 | 73.9% | 1.5 | 3.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.9% | 52.4% | 59.0% | 31.9% | 0.83 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Furman · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $8K
- 80% range $1K to $35K
- Median share of team pool
- 3.8%
- team pool $290K, 80% range $105K to $755K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $7K to $8K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 44.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Furman: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Furman | $8Kspeculative | $1K to $35K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.2 | -2.5 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -0.7 | +2.7range +2.2 to +3.2 | 1,859 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Furman | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.9 | -3.8 to -1.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | -2.1 | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.8 | 1,602 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 23:31 | 19:00 | 7:13–35:49 | |
| Points | 7.6 | 5.5 | 0.0–16.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 38.8% | 49.1% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-20 | UConn | L 71–82 | 17:47 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-09 | ETSU | W 76–61 | 24:42 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-08 | UNC Greensboro | W 81–75 | 25:35 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 6-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Samford | W 86–81 | 25:49 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Western Caro. | L 67–86 | 23:40 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-8 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 93.8% |
| 2026-02-25 | The Citadel | W 72–51 | 19:12 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Wofford | W 76–67 | 17:25 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | ETSU | L 69–78 | 13:58 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | VMI | W 90–72 | 16:30 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Mercer | L 64–69 | 15:45 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | UNC Greensboro | L 64–67 | 19:00 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | ETSU | L 71–75 | 9:28 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Chattanooga | W 75–70 | 19:17 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | Samford | W 78–73 | 15:56 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-21 | The Citadel | L 75–77 | 21:06 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 87.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | Wofford | L 70–74 | 35:49 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-6 | 2-3 | 27.8% |
| 2026-01-14 | Samford | W 77–73 | 31:38 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3-10 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | VMI | W 69–48 | 23:40 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5-11 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-07 | Chattanooga | W 78–67 | 7:25 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Western Caro. | L 77–80 | 14:26 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Mercer | W 74–72 | 17:22 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-21 | Charleston So. | W 84–76 | 16:03 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-18 | Manhattan | W 75–68 | 16:23 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Harvard | W 79–69 | 18:21 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-03 | Elon | W 97–88 | 11:28 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | Illinois St. | L 65–72 | 17:32 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-27 | Richmond | W 73–72 | 17:37 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Queens (NC) | W 90–79 | 27:02 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-11 | 3-8 | 2-3 | 59.1% |
| 2025-11-14 | UNI | L 54–70 | 19:36 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Troy | L 61–64 | 22:13 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-10 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | High Point | L 71–97 | 7:13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |