Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Harvard

Ivy · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 114 · Raw net 3.8 · Tempo 63.9 · 28 Division I games · Through 2026-03-14

All seasons
Record
16–12
16 wins
AdjNet
2.1β
rank 139 of 365
AdjO
107.1β
rank 201 of 365
AdjD
105.0β
rank 90 of 365
AdjT
64.7β
SOS
-1.4β
rank 208 of 363
NCSOS
-2.4β
WAB
-6.1β
rank 132 of 363
RR
-0.4β
Exp. W
16.4β

Scouting Report

CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.107.7189103.974108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%53.29550.412151.4
TO / 100 poss.17.423317.114116.7
Offensive rebound %26.830328.26930.6
FTA / FGA %25.735926.61735.0
Shooting
3P%34.713532.69533.9
2P%54.08751.415651.7
FT%80.8172.417872.5
Style
3PA / FGA %40.238.739.5
Assists / FGM %56.151.752.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %10.97.49.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %32.931.531.4
2-pointers %50.852.448.8
Free throws %16.316.019.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
7.3
Top Three Share of Minutes
50%
Bench Share of Minutes
19%
Players with Logged Minutes
16

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-09New HampshireW 86–7570.2Home1–0
11-11NortheasternL 60–7766.7Home1–1
11-15Army West PointW 75–5263.6Away2–1
11-16MaristW 56–5463.0Away3–1
11-19Penn St.L 80–8463.8Away3–2
11-22Boston U.L 74–7564.0Neutral3–3
11-26Boston CollegeL 60–7364.8Away3–4
11-29BryantW 56–5358.1Home4–4
12-03MassachusettsL 71–7873.0Away4–5
12-06FurmanL 69–7968.4Away4–6
12-20Holy CrossW 81–5361.2Home5–6
12-23St. John's (NY)L 59–8567.9Away5–7
12-28ColgateW 78–6968.8Away6–7
01-05DartmouthL 68–7664.0Home6–8
01-10ColumbiaW 79–5460.2Away7–8
01-17PrincetonW 87–80 1OT67.7Home8–8
01-19PennW 64–6362.4Home9–8
01-24CornellL 79–8665.4Home9–9
01-30BrownW 69–5960.9Away10–9
01-31YaleW 67–6557.9Away11–9
02-07DartmouthW 71–5864.4Away12–9
02-13BrownW 56–5361.8Home13–9
02-14YaleL 75–76 1OT65.7Home13–10
02-21CornellW 73–5460.1Away14–10
02-27PrincetonW 58–5660.0Away15–10
02-28PennL 61–6471.5Away15–11
03-06ColumbiaW 81–7167.4Home16–11
03-14PennL 60–62 1OT69.9Neutral16–12

Roster · 16 players

Player logs in 28 of 28 team games

MinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Tey Barbour2833:5683.7%13.65.21.50.70.31.31.944–6864.7%74–19038.9%71–8682.6%60.1%64.4%33.3%534:37 +0:4184.4%16.6 +3.0
Robert Hinton2833:4583.2%17.04.92.21.40.21.92.1160–29155.0%25–8230.5%82–9982.8%52.9%57.3%26.5%536:34 +2:4989.2%14.8 −2.2
Chandler Pigge2833:3582.9%12.95.13.31.60.32.11.7109–21251.4%28–8532.9%60–8075.0%50.8%54.5%26.9%536:48 +3:1389.8%11.8 −1.1
Thomas Batties II2833:0681.6%12.15.42.30.61.61.62.167–14047.9%57–12645.2%35–4185.4%57.3%59.9%15.4%535:41 +2:3587.0%12.2 +0.1
Ben Eisendrath2829:0871.9%5.32.23.31.60.52.22.248–8457.1%6–4214.3%†35–3989.7%45.2%52.0%31.0%533:57 +4:4982.8%6.6 +1.3
Austin Hunt1322:4226.0%6.83.51.10.80.31.21.821–3658.3%†13–3636.1%†8–8100.0%†56.3%†58.9%†11.1%†117:17 −5:258.4%4.0 −2.8
Frankie Mannino278:3320.4%1.81.20.50.40.10.30.917–2277.3%†1–1010.0%†12–1866.7%†57.8%†61.4%†56.3%†59:53 +1:2024.1%1.8 0.0
Ryan Sullivan206:4611.9%1.11.90.20.20.60.10.810–1471.4%†0–10.0%†2–633.3%†66.7%†62.4%†40.0%†25:35 −1:115.5%1.0 −0.1
Xavier Nesbitt274:5411.7%0.60.60.30.00.00.30.44–1136.4%†2–1711.8%†2–2100.0%†25.0%†27.7%†7.1%†53:32 −1:238.6%0.0 −0.6
Luca Ace-Nasteski195:399.5%1.20.90.30.10.10.20.77–1546.7%†0–10.0%†9–1181.8%†43.8%†55.2%†68.8%†46:07 +0:2811.9%0.5 −0.7
Kenan Parrish175:538.8%1.80.90.10.20.20.40.69–2240.9%†3–933.3%†3–560.0%†43.5%†45.2%†16.1%†12:20 −3:331.1%3.0 +1.2
Dutch Dowdell153:314.6%1.00.40.10.10.00.10.10–10.0%†5–1533.3%†0–0—46.9%†46.9%†0.0%†42:05 −1:264.1%0.8 −0.3
Joseph Quartey62:301.3%0.00.00.00.20.00.00.30–10.0%†0–20.0%†0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†10:40 −1:500.3%0.0 0.0
Greg Cooper32:140.6%0.00.30.00.00.00.00.00–0—0–10.0%†0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†13:43 +1:291.8%0.0 0.0
Payton Pitts21:060.2%0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–10.0%†0–0—0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†————
Avner Dror10:540.1%0.01.00.00.00.00.00.00–10.0%†0–0—0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†————
Team, games with logs · per game28 games69.831.914.23.811.3496–91954.0%214–61734.7%319–39580.8%53.2%57.1%25.7%
Sum of players69.828.914.27.13.710.513.5Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.00.0+0.0+0.8

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$0 (assumed opted out)
80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier
Low and other
low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Harvard University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$1,772,373Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$1,772,373
Athletics department expenses$47,700,542
Athletics department revenue$47,700,542

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 28 games, 1,813 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

StatisticTeamOpponents
Points69.867.3
Field goals made25.424.7
Field goals attempted54.956.0
3-pointers made7.67.1
3-pointers attempted22.021.7
Free throws made11.410.8
Free throws attempted14.114.9
Offensive rebounds8.39.3
Defensive rebounds23.722.5
Total rebounds31.931.8
Assists14.212.8
Blocks3.82.4
Turnovers11.311.1
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 200.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 379.
Minutes (derived)202.7

28 of 28 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled1,9531,9530±9.80
Field goals madeReconciled7107100±3.60
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,5361,5360±7.70
3-pointers madeReconciled2142140±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6176170±3.10
Free throws madeReconciled3193190±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled3953950±2.00
Offensive reboundsNo player split
Defensive reboundsNo player split
Total reboundsResidual shown894810+84±71.50
AssistsReconciled3983980±2.00
BlocksReconciled105104+1±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown316295+21±9.50
StealsNo team figure200
Personal foulsNo team figure379
Minutes (derived)Reconciled5,6755,656+18.5±113.50

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Tey Barbour84.0%+2.6range +1.7 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Robert Hinton83.7%+0.4range -0.7 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Chandler Pigge83.3%+2.0range +0.9 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Thomas Batties II81.9%+1.7range +0.5 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Ben Eisendrath72.0%-0.5range -2.1 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Austin Hunt26.3%+0.2range -1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Frankie Mannino19.9%+1.9range +1.2 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Ryan Sullivan12.0%+0.8range -0.0 to +1.5Limited evidence
Xavier Nesbitt11.7%-0.1range -0.9 to +0.9Limited evidence
Luca Ace-Nasteski9.5%+0.5range -0.1 to +1.1Limited evidence
Kenan Parrish8.8%-0.9range -1.7 to -0.1Limited evidence
Dutch Dowdell4.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Joseph Quartey1.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Greg Cooper0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Payton Pitts0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Avner Dror0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+10.5range +9.4 to +11.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.6% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 8.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value