UCF

B12 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 117 · Raw net 3.5 · Tempo 70.6 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-12

Record: 21–11; 21 wins
AdjNet: 10.0β; rank 64 of 365
AdjO: 116.6β; rank 50 of 365
AdjD: 106.6β; rank 131 of 365
AdjT: 69.9β
SOS: 8.1β; rank 35 of 363
NCSOS: -2.3β
WAB: 1.7β; rank 38 of 363
RR: 4.2β
Exp. W: 16.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	113.775	110.2224	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.8111	52.4235	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.7119	15.8230	16.7
Offensive rebound %	34.460	28.584	30.6
FTA / FGA %	30.8286	35.2184	35.0
Shooting
3P%	36.250	34.0185	33.9
2P%	52.1165	53.2246	51.7
FT%	74.0139	74.3279	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	34.4	39.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	53.6	51.3	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.3	9.0	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	29.1	30.9	31.4
2-pointers %	53.2	49.1	48.8
Free throws %	17.8	20.0	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.9
Top Three Share of Minutes: 44%
Bench Share of Minutes: 34%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Hofstra	W 82–78	72.8	Home	1–0
11-08	Vanderbilt	L 93–105	74.2	Home	1–1
11-11	Florida A&M	W 97–60	74.5	Home	2–1
11-14	Texas A&M	W 86–74	74.7	Away	3–1
11-17	Oakland	W 87–83	72.6	Home	4–1
11-20	Pittsburgh	W 77–67	62.8	Neutral	5–1
11-25	Quinnipiac	W 102–91	78.2	Home	6–1
11-29	VMI	W 82–57	68.0	Home	7–1
12-07	Towson	W 86–61	64.1	Home	8–1
12-17	Mercer	W 81–63	71.7	Home	9–1
12-20	FGCU	W 102–80	72.0	Home	10–1
12-23	Fla. Atlantic	W 85–80	76.1	Neutral	11–1
01-03	Kansas	W 81–75	69.6	Home	12–1
01-06	Oklahoma St.	L 76–87	80.8	Away	12–2
01-11	Cincinnati	W 73–72	67.0	Home	13–2
01-14	Kansas St.	W 82–73	74.3	Away	14–2
01-17	Arizona	L 77–84	74.7	Home	14–3
01-20	Iowa St.	L 57–87	65.4	Away	14–4
01-24	Colorado	W 95–86	70.2	Away	15–4
01-27	Arizona St.	W 79–76	69.8	Home	16–4
01-31	Texas Tech	W 88–80	69.1	Home	17–4
02-04	Houston	L 55–79	61.6	Away	17–5
02-08	Cincinnati	L 72–92	70.0	Away	17–6
02-14	West Virginia	L 67–74	67.8	Home	17–7
02-17	TCU	W 82–71	71.2	Home	18–7
02-21	Utah	W 73–71	62.3	Away	19–7
02-24	BYU	W 97–84	77.6	Away	20–7
02-28	Baylor	L 86–87	66.2	Home	20–8
03-03	Oklahoma St.	L 104–111 1OT	87.2	Home	20–9
03-06	West Virginia	L 62–77	66.7	Away	20–10
03-11	Cincinnati	W 66–65 1OT	76.5	Neutral	21–10
03-12	Arizona	L 59–81	68.4	Neutral	21–11

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Themus Fulks	32	32:48	81.4%	451	97	214	24	1	105	58	151–319	47.3%	20–49	40.8%†	89–112	79.5%	49.2%	54.0%	30.4%	5	35:38 +2:50	84.9%	12.8 −1.3
Jordan Burks	32	28:12	70.0%	417	153	20	34	16	28	48	88–165	53.3%	54–150	36.0%	79–101	78.2%	53.7%	58.0%	32.1%	5	31:38 +3:25	75.3%	11.0 −2.0
Riley Kugel	30	28:44	66.8%	432	92	76	31	7	52	81	100–230	43.5%	56–143	39.2%	64–83	77.1%	49.3%	52.7%	22.3%	5	29:07 +0:22	69.3%	16.2 +1.8
Jamichael Stillwell	30	28:16	65.8%	350	240	67	33	5	47	81	119–220	54.1%	12–38	31.6%†	76–105	72.4%	53.1%	57.5%	40.7%	5	30:13 +1:56	71.9%	10.6 −1.1
John Bol	32	18:50	46.7%	192	177	10	9	34	37	79	80–109	73.4%	0–1	0.0%†	32–47	68.1%	72.7%	73.5%	42.7%	5	24:06 +5:17	57.4%	8.2 +2.2
Devan Cambridge	32	17:22	43.1%	172	112	27	17	19	18	64	42–68	61.8%	15–58	25.9%	43–61	70.5%	51.2%	56.3%	48.4%	5	13:13 −4:09	31.5%	3.6 −1.8
Chris Johnson	31	15:36	37.5%	199	44	59	16	5	21	39	39–75	52.0%	31–84	36.9%	28–40	70.0%	53.8%	56.3%	25.2%	5	17:31 +1:55	41.7%	6.0 −0.4
Carmelo Pacheco	30	15:25	35.9%	140	38	11	6	0	5	20	4–8	50.0%	42–106	39.6%	6–6	100.0%†	58.8%	60.0%	5.3%	5	12:05 −3:21	28.8%	2.8 −1.9
Jeremy Foumena	26	9:32	19.2%	92	61	6	3	5	10	35	40–72	55.6%†	0–1	0.0%†	12–24	50.0%†	54.8%†	55.1%†	32.9%†	3	4:29 −5:03	6.4%	0.0 −3.5
George Beale Jr.	24	8:12	15.3%	88	21	7	3	2	6	21	8–27	29.6%†	19–56	33.9%	15–18	83.3%†	44.0%†	48.4%†	21.7%†	3	6:22 −1:51	9.1%	1.3 −2.3
Kris Parker	22	5:40	9.7%	38	16	5	1	1	15	18	11–17	64.7%†	2–7	28.6%†	10–17	58.8%†	58.3%†	60.4%†	70.8%†	3	3:06 −2:35	4.4%	1.0 −0.7
Elijah HulseweUnder 100 minutes	16	4:42	5.8%	18	24	2	4	1	2	16	6–10	60.0%†	0–0	—	6–8	75.0%†	60.0%†	66.6%†	80.0%†	5	7:30 +2:47	17.8%	2.8 +1.7
Zachary JohnsonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	1:42	0.9%	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Poohpha WarakulnukrohFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	1:27	0.5%	2	2	0	0	0	2	0	1–3	33.3%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	33.3%†	33.3%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	32 games			2591	1190	504	not published	96	358	not published	689–1323	52.1%	251–694	36.2%	460–622	74.0%	52.8%	56.6%	30.8%
Sum of players				2591	1079	504	181	96	348	560	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+111	0	not published	0	+10	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.60M; 80% Range $2.55M to $5.00M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.60M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Themus Fulks	82.0%	$590K	$335K to $955K	16.5%	$590K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Jordan Burks	69.6%	$250K	$36K to $470K	7.5%	$250K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Riley Kugel	67.4%	$450K	$215K to $745K	12.9%	$450K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Jamichael Stillwell	66.4%	$735K	$450K to $1.40M	19.5%	$735K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
John Bol	47.0%	$440K	$270K to $755K	11.8%	$440K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Devan Cambridge	43.2%	$260K	$95K to $425K	7.6%	$260K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Chris Johnson	36.8%	$235K	$105K to $385K	6.9%	$235K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Carmelo Pacheco	36.3%	$195K	$67K to $315K	5.9%	$195K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Jeremy Foumena	20.0%	$105K	$38K to $175K	3.2%	$105K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
George Beale Jr.	14.9%	$70K	$23K to $125K	2.1%	$70K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Kris Parker	9.7%	$47K	$20K to $85K	1.4%	$47K in all four	$25K	Limited evidence
Elijah Hulsewe	5.5%	$25K	$14K to $41K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Zachary Johnson	0.8%	$25K	$14K to $41K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Poohpha Warakulnukroh	0.3%	$25K	$14K to $41K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.60M	$2.55M to $5.00M	100%	$3.60M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Central Florida (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$7,812,023	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$7,812,023
Athletics department expenses	$103,615,446
Athletics department revenue	$108,885,086

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 32 games, 2,278 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,591	2,511
Field goals made	940	875
Field goals attempted	2,017	1,918
3-pointers made	251	259
3-pointers attempted	694	761
Free throws made	460	502
Free throws attempted	622	676
Offensive rebounds	396	317
Defensive rebounds	794	755
Total rebounds	1,190	1,072
Assists	504	449
Blocks	96	119
Turnovers	358	360
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 181.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 560.
Minutes (derived)	6,450	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,591	2,591	0	±13.0	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	940	940	0	±4.7	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,017	2,017	0	±10.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	251	251	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	694	694	0	±3.5	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	460	460	0	±2.3	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	622	622	0	±3.1	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,190	1,079	+111	±95.2	0
Assists	Reconciled	504	504	0	±2.5	0
Blocks	Reconciled	96	96	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	358	348	+10	±10.7	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	181	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	560	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,450	6,430	+20.0	±129.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Themus Fulks	82.0%	+2.1range +1.0 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Jordan Burks	69.6%	-0.2range -0.9 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Riley Kugel	67.4%	+1.9range +0.6 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Jamichael Stillwell	66.4%	+3.8range +2.6 to +5.2Sufficient evidence
John Bol	47.0%	+2.9range +1.6 to +4.5Sufficient evidence
Devan Cambridge	43.2%	+1.3range +0.1 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Chris Johnson	36.8%	+1.6range +0.4 to +2.7Sufficient evidence
Carmelo Pacheco	36.3%	+0.9range -0.1 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Jeremy Foumena	20.0%	+0.6range -0.3 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
George Beale Jr.	14.9%	-0.2range -1.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Kris Parker	9.7%	-0.7range -1.5 to +0.1Limited evidence
Elijah Hulsewe	5.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Zachary Johnson	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Poohpha Warakulnukroh	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +11.0range +10.1 to +11.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.7% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value

UCF