Kris Parker
UCF · 2025–26 · 22 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
124:48 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 22
- Minutes per game
- 5:40
- Points per game
- 1.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 0.7 / 0.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.2 | 5.1 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Season totals | 38 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 18 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 13–24 | 54.2%† | 1.1 | 7.7 |
| 2P | 11–17 | 64.7%† | 0.8 | 5.4 |
| 3P | 2–7 | 28.6%† | 0.3 | 2.2 |
| FT | 10–17 | 58.8%† | 0.8 | 5.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.3%† | 60.4%† | 29.2%† | 70.8%† | 0.33 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UCF · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $47K
- 80% range $20K to $85K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.4%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $5.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $47K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 9.7%
- Limited evidence
- Limited evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UCF: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UCF | $47Kspeculative | $20K to $85K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.7 | -1.5 to +0.1 | Limited evidence | -0.0 | -0.7 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.6 | 413 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2025 | Villanova | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.9 | -1.9 to +0.1 | Limited evidence | -0.1 | -0.8 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.8 | 564 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 2:58 | 5:40 | 0:26–14:04 | |
| Points | 0.6 | 1.7 | 0.0–9.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 30.0% | 46.5% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | Arizona | L 59–81 | 2:41 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | — |
| 2026-03-06 | West Virginia | L 62–77 | 2:43 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Baylor | L 86–87 | 3:53 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-24 | BYU | W 97–84 | 2:14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-21 | Utah | W 73–71 | 3:21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-14 | West Virginia | L 67–74 | 2:24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-04 | Houston | L 55–79 | 1:31 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-20 | Iowa St. | L 57–87 | 9:26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-11 | Cincinnati | W 73–72 | 0:26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-06 | Oklahoma St. | L 76–87 | 1:09 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-03 | Kansas | W 81–75 | 1:34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-23 | Fla. Atlantic | W 85–80 | 4:48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-20 · NCAA | FGCU | W 102–80 | 4:48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | Towson | W 86–61 | 8:30 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | VMI | W 82–57 | 11:45 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Quinnipiac | W 102–91 | 9:18 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-20 | Pittsburgh | W 77–67 | 6:55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Oakland | W 87–83 | 10:42 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Texas A&M | W 86–74 | 14:04 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-11 | Florida A&M | W 97–60 | 12:22 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Vanderbilt | L 93–105 | 6:42 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2025-11-03 | Hofstra | W 82–78 | 3:32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |