Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

UCF

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for UCF, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Themus Fulks82.0%+2.1range +1.0 to +3.3Sufficient evidence+6.2range +5.5 to +6.9Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Jordan Burks69.6%-0.2range -0.9 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+4.3range +3.8 to +4.8Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Riley Kugel67.4%+1.9range +0.6 to +3.2Sufficient evidence+5.1range +4.4 to +5.7Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Jamichael Stillwell66.4%+3.8range +2.6 to +5.2Sufficient evidence+5.8range +5.1 to +6.3Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
John Bol47.0%+2.9range +1.6 to +4.5Sufficient evidence+3.9range +3.4 to +4.4Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Devan Cambridge43.2%+1.3range +0.1 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.7 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Chris Johnson36.8%+1.6range +0.4 to +2.7Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.4 to +3.1Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Carmelo Pacheco36.3%+0.9range -0.1 to +1.9Sufficient evidence+2.5range +2.2 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Jeremy Foumena20.0%+0.6range -0.3 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.2 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
George Beale Jr.14.9%-0.2range -1.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceLoadingLoading
Kris Parker9.7%-0.7range -1.5 to +0.1Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceLoadingLoading
Elijah Hulsewe5.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableLoadingLoading
Zachary Johnson0.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableLoadingLoading
Poohpha Warakulnukroh0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableLoadingLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Loading Speculative compensation

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

Loading School finances

Coverage and exclusions

30 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (94%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 2 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$7,812,023Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$7,812,023Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
3 or more days30

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology