Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

UNCW

CAA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 51 · Raw net 9.8 · Tempo 66.1 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-21

All seasons
Record
25–7
25 wins
AdjNet
5.9β
rank 95 of 365
AdjO
111.1β
rank 113 of 365
AdjD
105.2β
rank 95 of 365
AdjT
66.3β
SOS
-3.0β
rank 265 of 363
NCSOS
-7.0β
WAB
-1.4β
rank 65 of 363
RR
2.3β
Exp. W
22.7β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.112.985103.160108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%50.422047.53051.4
TO / 100 poss.14.85714.929416.7
Offensive rebound %35.34027.65130.6
FTA / FGA %40.45431.710035.0
Shooting
3P%35.012429.7633.9
2P%49.127949.78851.7
FT%68.730673.825972.5
Style
3PA / FGA %38.842.639.5
Assists / FGM %51.747.952.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %7.37.99.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %31.732.131.4
2-pointers %46.748.248.8
Free throws %21.619.819.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
7.6
Top Three Share of Minutes
47%
Bench Share of Minutes
25%
Players with Logged Minutes
12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-10Kent St.L 77–8672.0Away0–1
11-15USC UpstateW 73–6061.4Home1–1
11-18East CarolinaW 85–6067.0Home2–1
11-21RadfordW 81–7370.0Away3–1
11-26Southeastern La.W 70–5762.5Home4–1
11-28NavyW 87–5765.2Home5–1
11-29Gardner-WebbW 88–6269.2Home6–1
12-03MarshallW 70–6962.4Home7–1
12-06LouisianaW 70–6363.8Away8–1
12-13ValparaisoW 73–7063.5Away9–1
12-20HowardL 66–6767.1Home9–2
12-29N.C. A&TW 87–7875.5Away10–2
12-31DrexelW 65–5360.2Home11–2
01-03HamptonW 49–4559.6Home12–2
01-08NortheasternW 87–7872.8Away13–2
01-10Stony BrookW 75–7165.5Away14–2
01-17CampbellW 78–7567.6Home15–2
01-22William & MaryL 70–7772.6Away15–3
01-24HamptonW 75–6759.8Away16–3
01-29TowsonW 82–7364.2Away17–3
02-05William & MaryL 78–8567.5Home17–4
02-09Col. of CharlestonW 76–6468.0Away18–4
02-12ElonW 65–5460.2Home19–4
02-14HofstraW 70–6661.0Home20–4
02-19MonmouthW 79–6972.0Home21–4
02-21CampbellW 73–6868.3Away22–4
02-26N.C. A&TW 88–6564.6Home23–4
03-01Col. of CharlestonL 76–7964.5Home23–5
03-03ElonW 76–5766.9Away24–5
03-08CampbellL 70–8571.6Neutral24–6
03-17YaleW 68–6765.1—25–6
03-21DaytonL 61–8063.6—25–7

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groupsMinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Nolan Hodge3232:4882.0%13.94.61.60.70.51.01.849–12040.8%85–22338.1%93–12077.5%51.5%56.3%35.0%531:10 −1:3877.9%10.6 −3.3
Greedy Williams3230:4777.0%9.02.64.21.00.11.81.863–13447.0%24–6735.8%90–11677.6%49.3%57.1%57.7%532:04 +1:1780.2%7.0 −2.0
Christian May3230:0275.1%10.75.61.50.70.41.52.763–12351.2%61–17634.7%33–5164.7%51.7%53.2%17.1%531:21 +1:1978.4%12.2 +1.5
Noah Ross3229:2573.5%9.25.11.80.90.30.82.695–19548.7%20–7427.0%43–6368.3%46.5%49.4%23.4%530:54 +1:2977.3%10.0 +0.8
Patrick Wessler3227:1568.1%13.59.41.10.60.81.52.9174–29559.0%0–10.0%†84–15454.5%58.8%59.4%52.0%530:24 +3:0976.0%13.4 −0.1
Madison Durr3221:1853.2%9.82.72.00.50.11.22.459–15338.6%20–6331.7%136–18075.6%41.2%53.2%83.3%519:11 −2:0648.0%11.0 +1.2
Gavin Walsh1325:2425.8%9.16.30.80.90.10.62.131–6250.0%12–3930.8%†20–4148.8%48.5%49.6%40.6%————
Jahnathan Lamothe1914:4321.8%5.41.70.70.40.10.51.97–2035.0%†27–6740.3%8–1553.3%†54.6%†55.0%†17.2%†515:10 +0:2737.9%3.6 −1.8
Makoi Mabor Makoi318:0419.6%1.42.40.10.10.10.51.117–3450.0%†0–10.0%†8–8100.0%†48.6%†54.5%†22.9%†59:02 +0:5822.6%1.6 +0.2
Makel SmithFew gamesUnder 100 minutes62:141.0%1.50.20.00.00.00.20.20–0—3–837.5%†0–10.0%†56.3%†53.3%†12.5%†20:29 −1:450.5%1.5 0.0
Grady WhittFew gamesUnder 100 minutes61:470.8%0.00.30.20.00.00.00.00–0—0–20.0%†0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†20:40 −1:080.7%0.0 0.0
JoJo FullwoodFew gamesUnder 100 minutes61:370.8%0.20.20.00.00.20.00.00–0—0–0—1–250.0%†—56.8%†—20:29 −1:080.5%0.5 +0.3
Team, games with logs · per game32 games74.639.113.1not published2.49.8not published558–113649.1%252–72135.0%516–75168.7%50.4%54.6%40.4%
Sum of players74.635.913.15.12.48.917.3Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.20.0not published0.0+0.9not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$255K
80% Range $93K to $675K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$245K to $265K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
12
3 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Nolan Hodge82.5%$22K$4K to $71K10.9%$21K to $23K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Greedy Williams77.3%$53K$19K to $155K20.1%$51K to $56K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Christian May75.6%$19K$3K to $65K9.6%$18K to $20K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Noah Ross73.9%$37K$12K to $105K14.9%$36K to $39K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Patrick Wessler68.8%$59K$19K to $175K21.2%$57K to $61K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Madison Durr52.9%$16K$3K to $55K7.9%$16K to $17K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Gavin Walsh25.6%$16K$5K to $45K6.1%$15K to $16K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jahnathan Lamothe21.6%$4K$1K to $16K2.0%$4K to $5K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Makoi Mabor Makoi19.4%$4K$1K to $14K1.7%$4K in all four$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Makel Smith1.0%$2K$1K to $6K0.8%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Grady Whitt0.8%$2K$1K to $6K0.8%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
JoJo Fullwood0.7%$2K$1K to $6K0.8%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$255K$93K to $675K100%$245K to $265K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of North Carolina Wilmington (NCAA Division I without football)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$3,053,344Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$3,053,344
Athletics department expenses$26,310,913
Athletics department revenue$26,310,913

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 32 games, 2,115 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points74.668.1
Field goals made25.323.7
Field goals attempted58.057.6
3-pointers made7.97.3
3-pointers attempted22.524.5
Free throws made16.113.5
Free throws attempted23.518.3
Offensive rebounds13.09.9
Defensive rebounds26.123.8
Total rebounds39.133.7
Assists13.111.3
Blocks2.42.8
Turnovers9.89.9
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 163.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 552.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,3882,3880±11.90
Field goals madeReconciled8108100±4.00
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,8571,8570±9.30
3-pointers madeReconciled2522520±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled7217210±3.60
Free throws madeReconciled5165160±2.60
Free throws attemptedReconciled7517510±3.80
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown1,2511,149+102±100.10
AssistsReconciled4194190±2.10
BlocksReconciled77770±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown314284+30±9.40
StealsNo team figurenot published163not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published552not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,4006,384+16.1±128.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Nolan Hodge82.5%+0.6range -0.6 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Greedy Williams77.3%+3.7range +2.0 to +4.9Sufficient evidence
Christian May75.6%+0.4range -0.7 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Noah Ross73.9%+2.4range +1.1 to +3.7Sufficient evidence
Patrick Wessler68.8%+4.2range +2.7 to +5.6Sufficient evidence
Madison Durr52.9%+0.7range -0.9 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Gavin Walsh25.6%+2.8range +1.6 to +3.6Sufficient evidence
Jahnathan Lamothe21.6%-1.1range -2.1 to -0.2Sufficient evidence
Makoi Mabor Makoi19.4%-1.4range -2.7 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Makel Smith1.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Grady Whitt0.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
JoJo Fullwood0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+11.2range +10.2 to +12.0Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 99.5% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.5%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value