Drexel

CAA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 186 · Raw net -0.4 · Tempo 65.2 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-08

Record: 16–16; 16 wins
AdjNet: -2.9β; rank 217 of 365
AdjO: 103.2β; rank 284 of 365
AdjD: 106.1β; rank 117 of 365
AdjT: 65.6β
SOS: -2.9β; rank 262 of 363
NCSOS: -5.9β
WAB: -10.3β; rank 232 of 363
RR: -0.1β
Exp. W: 16.1β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	103.3283	103.670	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	50.7204	47.122	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	19.0321	16.4195	16.7
Offensive rebound %	31.2155	31.0204	30.6
FTA / FGA %	31.6265	35.4192	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.589	30.315	33.9
2P%	49.0284	47.943	51.7
FT%	66.5348	75.2320	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	40.0	34.1	39.5
Assists / FGM %	53.6	47.3	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.6	9.3	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	34.8	25.7	31.4
2-pointers %	48.0	52.3	48.8
Free throws %	17.2	22.1	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.4
Top Three Share of Minutes: 46%
Bench Share of Minutes: 32%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-08	Saint Joseph's	L 65–76	71.5	Away	0–1
11-11	Colgate	L 83–90	69.5	Away	0–2
11-15	Syracuse	L 50–80	64.4	Neutral	0–3
11-18	NJIT	W 75–43	69.8	Home	1–3
11-21	Penn	L 68–84	67.2	Home	1–4
11-23	Old Dominion	W 75–71	65.8	Home	2–4
11-25	Morgan St.	W 71–66	64.7	Away	3–4
12-03	American	L 73–75	67.0	Away	3–5
12-06	La Salle	L 64–69	66.3	Neutral	3–6
12-16	Howard	L 66–74	67.0	Home	3–7
12-19	Mount St. Mary's	W 75–67	71.7	Home	4–7
12-21	Maine	W 74–56	57.3	Home	5–7
12-29	Col. of Charleston	L 63–72	62.6	Away	5–8
12-31	UNCW	L 53–65	60.2	Away	5–9
01-03	Hofstra	L 67–70	59.3	Home	5–10
01-08	Stony Brook	W 56–37	57.0	Home	6–10
01-10	William & Mary	W 64–58	66.4	Home	7–10
01-15	Monmouth	W 73–51	59.6	Away	8–10
01-19	Towson	L 58–59	62.9	Away	8–11
01-24	Northeastern	W 83–78	69.4	Home	9–11
01-29	Hampton	W 58–51	62.1	Home	10–11
01-31	N.C. A&T	W 61–60	64.0	Home	11–11
02-05	Campbell	L 60–81	69.0	Away	11–12
02-07	Elon	W 82–77	67.6	Away	12–12
02-12	Monmouth	L 73–93	71.7	Home	12–13
02-16	Stony Brook	L 69–72	65.4	Away	12–14
02-19	Northeastern	W 70–61	67.0	Away	13–14
02-22	Towson	W 68–62	66.1	Home	14–14
02-26	Campbell	W 65–60	63.7	Home	15–14
03-03	Hofstra	L 51–62	56.7	Away	15–15
03-07	Northeastern	W 84–77	68.8	Neutral	16–15
03-08	Monmouth	L 57–65	64.6	Neutral	16–16

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Shane Blakeney	32	33:54	84.7%	14.3	5.0	2.5	1.1	0.7	2.1	1.6	105–226	46.5%	65–182	35.7%	53–79	67.1%	49.6%	51.7%	19.4%	5	36:19 +2:26	90.8%	15.6 +1.3
Kevon Vanderhorst	32	29:36	74.0%	9.3	2.7	2.8	1.0	0.0	1.5	1.8	88–157	56.1%	23–92	25.0%	53–69	76.8%	49.2%	53.3%	27.7%	5	30:13 +0:37	75.5%	8.8 −0.5
Victor Panov	30	29:00	68.0%	10.0	4.8	1.5	0.9	0.6	1.4	2.1	43–82	52.4%	56–147	38.1%	47–69	68.1%	55.5%	58.0%	30.1%	5	32:24 +3:24	81.0%	11.4 +1.4
Eli Beard	32	26:43	66.8%	9.1	2.2	2.0	0.9	0.1	1.3	1.7	29–68	42.6%	63–148	42.6%	43–52	82.7%	57.2%	60.7%	24.1%	5	29:32 +2:49	73.8%	8.6 −0.5
Josh Reed	32	18:32	46.3%	7.7	2.9	1.1	0.5	0.1	1.2	1.4	89–202	44.1%	8–30	26.7%†	43–71	60.6%	43.5%	46.5%	30.6%	5	16:04 −2:29	40.2%	4.0 −3.7
Garfield Turner	29	19:47	44.8%	6.9	5.2	1.1	0.4	0.6	1.0	2.9	69–115	60.0%	0–0	—	61–108	56.5%	60.0%	61.2%	93.9%	5	23:00 +3:12	57.5%	11.6 +4.7
Villiam Garcia Adsten	32	17:27	43.6%	3.5	3.8	1.3	0.4	0.3	1.3	1.8	24–69	34.8%	14–47	29.8%†	23–42	54.8%	38.8%	42.0%	36.2%	5	7:38 −9:48	19.1%	0.4 −3.1
Martin de Laporterie	32	13:23	33.5%	2.9	3.0	0.3	0.1	0.6	0.9	2.2	31–62	50.0%†	6–18	33.3%†	14–20	70.0%†	50.0%†	52.9%†	25.0%†	5	10:53 −2:30	27.2%	3.6 +0.7
Dillon Tingler	28	9:19	20.4%	3.4	1.9	0.3	0.5	0.1	0.7	1.3	18–36	50.0%†	11–29	37.9%†	25–26	96.2%	53.1%†	61.5%†	40.0%†	5	5:25 −3:53	13.6%	1.0 −2.4
Ralph Akuta	28	4:38	10.2%	1.3	0.8	0.0	0.1	0.5	0.4	0.6	16–29	55.2%†	0–0	—	5–16	31.3%†	55.2%†	51.3%†	55.2%†	4	4:58 +0:20	9.9%	0.0 −1.3
Horace SimmonsUnder 100 minutes	12	5:30	5.1%	1.7	0.8	0.2	0.0	0.1	0.2	0.5	4–9	44.4%†	3–11	27.3%†	3–4	75.0%†	42.5%†	46.0%†	20.0%†	1	1:49 −3:40	0.9%	0.0 −1.7
Max DavisFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	1:35	0.4%	1.7	0.3	0.3	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	1–1	100.0%†	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	125.0%†	125.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:31 −1:04	0.3%	0.0 −1.7
Ignacio Campoy GalvezFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	2:16	0.2%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	32 games			67.3	34.6	12.8	not published	3.5	12.4	not published	517–1056	49.0%	250–705	35.5%	370–556	66.5%	50.7%	53.7%	31.6%
Sum of players				67.3	31.5	12.8	5.8	3.5	11.4	16.9	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.1	0.0	not published	+0.0	+1.0	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $275K; 80% Range $105K to $720K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $275K to $280K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Shane Blakeney	85.2%	$30K	$5K to $96K	14.1%	$30K to $31K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kevon Vanderhorst	75.6%	$31K	$5K to $100K	13.6%	$30K to $31K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Victor Panov	69.7%	$71K	$23K to $210K	23.7%	$70K to $72K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eli Beard	66.5%	$24K	$4K to $75K	10.9%	$23K to $24K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josh Reed	47.1%	$10K	$1K to $42K	5.1%	$10K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Villiam Garcia Adsten	44.0%	$6K	$1K to $29K	2.7%	$6K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Garfield Turner	43.1%	$37K	$12K to $110K	12.3%	$36K to $37K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Martin de Laporterie	34.4%	$7K	$1K to $27K	3.3%	$7K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dillon Tingler	19.2%	$17K	$6K to $50K	5.7%	$17K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ralph Akuta	10.3%	$5K	$1K to $14K	2.0%	$5K in all four	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Horace Simmons	4.5%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Max Davis	0.3%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Ignacio Campoy Galvez	0.2%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$275K	$105K to $720K	100%	$275K to $280K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Drexel University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,099,674	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,099,674
Athletics department expenses	$31,054,724
Athletics department revenue	$31,054,724

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 32 games, 2,086 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	67.3	67.6
Field goals made	24.0	23.4
Field goals attempted	55.0	55.9
3-pointers made	7.8	5.8
3-pointers attempted	22.0	19.1
Free throws made	11.6	14.9
Free throws attempted	17.4	19.8
Offensive rebounds	10.6	10.8
Defensive rebounds	24.0	23.3
Total rebounds	34.6	34.1
Assists	12.8	11.1
Blocks	3.5	3.1
Turnovers	12.4	10.7
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 186.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 541.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,154	2,154	0	±10.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	767	767	0	±3.8	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,761	1,761	0	±8.8	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	250	250	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	705	705	0	±3.5	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	370	370	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	556	556	0	±2.8	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,106	1,008	+98	±88.5	0
Assists	Reconciled	411	411	0	±2.1	0
Blocks	Reconciled	113	112	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	397	365	+32	±11.9	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	186	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	541	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,400	6,374	+26.0	±128.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Shane Blakeney	85.2%	+0.4range -0.6 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Kevon Vanderhorst	75.6%	+0.6range -1.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Victor Panov	69.7%	+3.1range +1.8 to +4.3Sufficient evidence
Eli Beard	66.5%	+0.3range -0.6 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Josh Reed	47.1%	-1.1range -2.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Villiam Garcia Adsten	44.0%	-2.2range -3.6 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Garfield Turner	43.1%	+2.6range +1.2 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
Martin de Laporterie	34.4%	-1.3range -2.4 to +0.0Sufficient evidence
Dillon Tingler	19.2%	+2.3range +1.2 to +3.8Sufficient evidence
Ralph Akuta	10.3%	-0.3range -1.1 to +0.6Limited evidence
Horace Simmons	4.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Max Davis	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ignacio Campoy Galvez	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.9range +9.1 to +10.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 99.0% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.1%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value