Kent St.

MAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 140 · Raw net 2.2 · Tempo 71.9 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-18

Record: 22–10; 22 wins
AdjNet: 1.0β; rank 158 of 365
AdjO: 110.1β; rank 133 of 365
AdjD: 109.1β; rank 200 of 365
AdjT: 71.0β
SOS: -0.9β; rank 194 of 363
NCSOS: -1.8β
WAB: -2.9β; rank 81 of 363
RR: 4.4β
Exp. W: 17.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	112.199	109.9219	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	51.4175	52.1220	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	18.0269	16.1220	16.7
Offensive rebound %	35.339	29.3124	30.6
FTA / FGA %	43.515	39.5294	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.0118	35.0245	33.9
2P%	50.6230	51.8183	51.7
FT%	74.4107	72.4175	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	44.9	43.1	39.5
Assists / FGM %	56.8	55.3	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.4	9.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	34.9	34.1	31.4
2-pointers %	41.2	44.4	48.8
Free throws %	23.9	21.5	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 47%
Bench Share of Minutes: 29%
Players with Logged Minutes: 15

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Troy	L 97–103 1OT	85.7	Home	0–1
11-07	Cornell	W 110–102	79.1	Home	1–1
11-10	UNCW	W 86–77	72.0	Home	2–1
11-15	Cleveland St.	W 102–95	76.0	Neutral	3–1
11-16	Wright St.	W 76–72 1OT	73.7	Neutral	4–1
11-18	Eastern Ky.	W 93–78	81.5	Home	5–1
11-22	Cleveland St.	W 91–71	78.2	Home	6–1
12-03	Austin Peay	W 96–84	73.4	Home	7–1
12-14	Portland	L 78–88	81.6	Away	7–2
12-20	Massachusetts	W 69–59	70.7	Away	8–2
12-29	Purdue	L 60–101	75.8	Away	8–3
01-03	NIU	W 77–73	73.1	Home	9–3
01-06	Bowling Green	W 96–93	70.4	Home	10–3
01-10	Central Mich.	L 85–87	72.5	Away	10–4
01-13	Buffalo	W 87–81	70.2	Away	11–4
01-16	Toledo	W 87–84	71.9	Home	12–4
01-20	Miami (OH)	L 101–107 1OT	82.4	Home	12–5
01-24	Eastern Mich.	W 76–75 2OT	78.2	Away	13–5
01-27	Ohio	W 72–57	71.8	Home	14–5
01-30	Akron	L 52–69	68.3	Away	14–6
02-03	Toledo	W 75–72	68.5	Away	15–6
02-07	Southern Miss.	L 65–66	65.0	Away	15–7
02-11	Eastern Mich.	W 95–91	70.2	Home	16–7
02-14	Ball St.	W 75–68	72.6	Away	17–7
02-17	Bowling Green	W 78–71	72.5	Away	18–7
02-24	Central Mich.	W 83–81	66.9	Home	19–7
02-27	Akron	L 70–92	70.4	Home	19–8
03-03	NIU	W 102–76	75.9	Away	20–8
03-06	Western Mich.	W 86–78	70.2	Home	21–8
03-12	Ohio	W 86–75	71.0	Neutral	22–8
03-13	Akron	L 68–75	68.3	Neutral	22–9
03-18	Illinois St.	L 58–79	69.1	—	22–10

Roster · 15 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Cian Medley	31	33:56	80.6%	10.9	2.4	6.2	1.3	0.1	3.2	2.5	46–119	38.7%	51–163	31.3%	93–123	75.6%	43.4%	50.3%	43.6%	5	33:28 −0:28	83.7%	10.2 −0.7
Delrecco Gillespie	32	32:46	80.3%	17.9	11.4	1.8	1.0	1.2	2.9	2.8	182–337	54.0%	15–58	25.9%	165–209	78.9%	51.8%	58.9%	52.9%	5	28:28 −4:17	71.2%	14.2 −3.7
Morgan Safford	31	31:57	75.9%	14.1	5.6	1.4	0.9	0.5	1.5	2.9	69–142	48.6%	65–191	34.0%	104–131	79.4%	50.0%	55.9%	39.3%	4	29:49 −2:08	59.6%	16.0 +1.9
Jahari Williamson	32	25:42	63.0%	10.4	2.0	0.8	0.9	0.0	0.4	2.0	24–54	44.4%	77–173	44.5%	53–65	81.5%	61.5%	64.9%	28.6%	5	29:00 +3:18	72.5%	12.0 +1.6
Rob Whaley Jr.	30	24:16	55.8%	12.0	4.3	1.5	0.8	0.6	2.2	3.1	123–229	53.7%	7–25	28.0%†	94–152	61.8%	52.6%	56.3%	59.8%	5	24:01 −0:15	60.1%	13.2 +1.2
Quinn Woidke	32	19:19	47.4%	9.0	2.6	1.4	0.6	0.0	0.9	2.2	20–41	48.8%	64–159	40.3%	56–69	81.2%	58.0%	62.5%	34.5%	5	20:40 +1:21	51.7%	9.0 0.0
Rayvon Griffith	31	13:31	32.1%	3.5	2.7	0.7	0.5	0.1	0.7	1.3	26–49	53.1%	15–53	28.3%	13–25	52.0%	47.5%	48.7%	24.5%	5	13:23 −0:08	33.4%	2.2 −1.3
Magnus Entenmann	31	11:30	27.3%	2.3	2.2	0.5	0.3	0.3	0.5	1.3	15–28	53.6%†	6–23	26.1%†	23–27	85.2%	47.1%†	56.5%†	52.9%†	5	11:12 −0:18	28.0%	1.0 −1.3
Dezmon Briscoe	28	8:17	17.8%	1.9	1.9	0.3	0.2	0.6	0.5	1.9	19–38	50.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	16–28	57.1%	48.7%†	52.6%†	71.8%†	5	8:25 +0:08	21.0%	3.4 +1.5
Omer Hamama	21	6:40	10.7%	1.6	0.8	1.3	0.3	0.0	0.7	0.5	11–23	47.8%†	1–9	11.1%†	9–10	90.0%†	39.1%†	46.7%†	31.3%†	1	4:42 −1:58	2.4%	2.0 +0.4
Brenden MossUnder 100 minutes	13	4:46	4.7%	1.3	0.9	0.2	0.4	0.0	0.2	0.2	3–5	60.0%†	3–14	21.4%†	2–2	100.0%†	39.5%†	42.8%†	10.5%†	3	7:58 +3:12	11.9%	1.7 +0.4
Landon VanderwarkerFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	3:54	2.4%	1.4	0.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.5	3–6	50.0%†	1–5	20.0%†	2–6	33.3%†	40.9%†	40.3%†	54.5%†	—	—	—	—
Deandre JonesFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	1:59	0.8%	0.4	0.8	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0.4	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	100.0%†	100.0%†	0.0%†	1	3:43 +1:44	1.9%	0.0 −0.4
Drew HuffmanFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	0:42	0.1%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	1	0:42 0:00	0.3%	0.0 0.0
Dylan LakatosFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	0:42	0.1%	3.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	150.0%†	150.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:42 0:00	0.3%	3.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per game	32 games			82.3	38.9	15.1	not published	3.3	13.2	not published	542–1072	50.6%	306–875	35.0%	630–847	74.4%	51.4%	56.7%	43.5%
Sum of players				82.3	35.3	15.1	6.5	3.3	13.0	20.0	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.7	−0.1	not published	0.0	+0.2	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $295K; 80% Range $110K to $740K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $270K to $305K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Cian Medley	81.2%	$29K	$4K to $92K	12.3%	$26K to $30K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Delrecco Gillespie	81.1%	$64K	$21K to $190K	20.8%	$59K to $67K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Morgan Safford	78.7%	$48K	$15K to $135K	16.9%	$45K to $50K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jahari Williamson	63.3%	$42K	$12K to $125K	14.0%	$38K to $43K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rob Whaley Jr.	56.0%	$22K	$4K to $69K	9.2%	$20K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Quinn Woidke	46.3%	$29K	$8K to $88K	10.1%	$27K to $31K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rayvon Griffith	31.6%	$5K	$1K to $20K	1.3%	$4K to $5K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Magnus Entenmann	27.5%	$10K	$2K to $32K	4.1%	$9K to $10K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dezmon Briscoe	17.0%	$7K	$2K to $20K	2.8%	$6K to $7K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Omer Hamama	10.8%	$6K	$2K to $17K	2.3%	$5K to $6K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Brenden Moss	3.4%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Landon Vanderwarker	2.7%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Deandre Jones	0.5%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$295K	$110K to $740K	100%	$270K to $305K	—

2 rostered players have no figure: no recorded possessions or no matched player record.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Kent State University at Kent (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,036,075	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,036,075
Athletics department expenses	$37,209,656
Athletics department revenue	$37,209,656

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 32 games, 2,347 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	82.3	80.6
Field goals made	26.5	27.1
Field goals attempted	60.8	60.8
3-pointers made	9.6	9.2
3-pointers attempted	27.3	26.2
Free throws made	19.7	17.3
Free throws attempted	26.5	24.0
Offensive rebounds	13.1	10.7
Defensive rebounds	25.8	24.0
Total rebounds	38.9	34.7
Assists	15.1	15.0
Blocks	3.3	3.2
Turnovers	13.2	11.8
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 209.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 639.
Minutes (derived)	203.9	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,632	2,632	0	±13.2	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	848	848	0	±4.2	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,947	1,947	0	±9.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	306	306	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	875	875	0	±4.4	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	630	630	0	±3.1	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	847	847	0	±4.2	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,246	1,129	+117	±99.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	482	484	−2	±2.4	0
Blocks	Reconciled	104	104	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	422	416	+6	±12.7	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	209	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	639	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,525	6,511	+14.3	±130.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Cian Medley	81.2%	+0.2range -1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Delrecco Gillespie	81.1%	+2.3range +1.0 to +3.7Sufficient evidence
Morgan Safford	78.7%	+1.6range +0.3 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Jahari Williamson	63.3%	+1.8range +0.4 to +3.1Sufficient evidence
Rob Whaley Jr.	56.0%	+0.4range -0.8 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Quinn Woidke	46.3%	+1.6range +0.2 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Rayvon Griffith	31.6%	-2.7range -4.2 to -1.3Sufficient evidence
Magnus Entenmann	27.5%	-0.1range -1.6 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Dezmon Briscoe	17.0%	-0.0range -1.0 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Omer Hamama	10.8%	+0.4range -0.4 to +1.1Limited evidence
Brenden Moss	3.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Landon Vanderwarker	2.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Deandre Jones	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.3range +9.4 to +11.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.7% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.2%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value