Nolan Hodge
UNCW · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1049:32 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 32:48
- Points per game
- 13.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.6 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.9 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.0 | 5.6 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 2.2 |
| Season totals | 446 | 146 | 51 | 22 | 16 | 33 | 59 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 134–343 | 39.1% | 10.7 | 13.1 |
| 2P | 49–120 | 40.8% | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| 3P | 85–223 | 38.1% | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| FT | 93–120 | 77.5% | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.5% | 56.3% | 65.0% | 35.0% | 1.55 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UNC Wilmington · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $22K
- 80% range $4K to $71K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.9%
- team pool $255K, 80% range $93K to $675K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $21K to $23K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 82.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UNC Wilmington: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UNC Wilmington | $22Kspeculative | $4K to $71K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.6 | -0.6 to +1.8 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | -1.2 | +6.2range +5.2 to +7.1 | 3,491 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | UNC Wilmington | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.4 to +0.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.9 | +2.6range +2.1 to +3.2 | 1,760 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | UNC Wilmington | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.0 | -1.9 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | -1.0 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.4 | 1,129 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:10 | 32:48 | 17:44–37:46 | |
| Points | 10.6 | 13.9 | 2.0–28.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 46.9% | 50.6% | 0.0%–70.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Dayton | L 61–80 | 33:22 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-17 | Yale | W 68–67 | 33:47 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-11 | 2-5 | 5-5 | 36.4% |
| 2026-03-08 | Campbell | L 70–85 | 30:14 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Elon | W 76–57 | 29:26 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-01 | Col. of Charleston | L 76–79 | 29:01 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-12 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-26 | N.C. A&T | W 88–65 | 31:03 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Campbell | W 73–68 | 37:46 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2-11 | 2-10 | 2-6 | 27.3% |
| 2026-02-19 | Monmouth | W 79–69 | 34:27 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-10 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Hofstra | W 70–66 | 25:07 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Elon | W 65–54 | 35:29 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-11 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | Col. of Charleston | W 76–64 | 37:25 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-12 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 45.8% |
| 2026-02-05 | William & Mary | L 78–85 | 35:05 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7-16 | 5-10 | 3-4 | 59.4% |
| 2026-01-29 | Towson | W 82–73 | 33:13 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7-16 | 7-15 | 2-5 | 65.6% |
| 2026-01-24 | Hampton | W 75–67 | 35:46 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | William & Mary | L 70–77 | 37:44 | 10 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-12 | 2-11 | 4-4 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Campbell | W 78–75 | 36:19 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0-9 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Stony Brook | W 75–71 | 35:18 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-17 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 64.7% |
| 2026-01-08 | Northeastern | W 87–78 | 35:32 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2-9 | 2-5 | 11-11 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Hampton | W 49–45 | 36:05 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 3-5 | 21.4% |
| 2025-12-31 | Drexel | W 65–53 | 24:26 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 4-5 | 65.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | N.C. A&T | W 87–78 | 37:17 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-12 | 5-9 | 7-8 | 70.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | Howard | L 66–67 | 33:16 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 45.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Valparaiso | W 73–70 | 34:46 | 28 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-13 | 4-10 | 10-12 | 69.2% |
| 2025-12-06 | Louisiana | W 70–63 | 17:44 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-03 | Marshall | W 70–69 | 32:09 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-12 | 1-6 | 11-14 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | Gardner-Webb | W 88–62 | 32:46 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-13 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 57.7% |
| 2025-11-28 | Navy | W 87–57 | 28:55 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Southeastern La. | W 70–57 | 30:23 | 14 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-12 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Radford | W 81–73 | 34:29 | 18 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4-9 | 4-6 | 6-6 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-18 | East Carolina | W 85–60 | 30:22 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | USC Upstate | W 73–60 | 37:11 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-11 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-10 | Kent St. | L 77–86 | 33:39 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-15 | 4-9 | 3-4 | 60.0% |